Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing ((STUDFUZZ,volume 348))

  • 480 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter I use the notions introduced above to lay out conditions of vagueness in pictures, the diversity of roles and scenarios and differences from vague linguistic predicates and representation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Lopes [1], Kulvicki [2].

  2. 2.

    See Wollheim [3].

  3. 3.

    The significance of this issue in the history of science and philosophy of science derives from the methodological and cognitive significance of any distinction between observation and theory.

  4. 4.

    For a metaphysical discussion of such entities as intentional objects, see Zalta [4]; for a consideration of their inclusion in the scope of perceptual representation, see Falguera and Peleteiro [5].

  5. 5.

    Hopkins [6].

  6. 6.

    This view is more restrictive than Goodman’s account of depiction or pictorial denotation.

  7. 7.

    Peirce [7], Goodman [8], Lopes [1].

  8. 8.

    Kulvicki [2, 9].

  9. 9.

    Siegel [10].

  10. 10.

    See also Lopes [1].

  11. 11.

    Beyond the scope of resemblance characterizing the role of iconic visual signs, Peirce referred to signs causally traceable or inferable to their content as indices, and to the more arbitrary kind of conventions, symbolic signs.

  12. 12.

    Goodman [8], Hopkins [6].

References

  1. Lopes, D. (1996). Understanding pictures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kulvicki, J. (2014). Images. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wollheim, R. (1980). Art and its objects: With six supplementary essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Zalta, E. (1988). Intensional logic and the metaphysics of intentionality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Falguera, J. L., & Peleteiro, S. (2014). ‘Percepción y justificación, legitimación o sustento?’, ESTYLF 2014 (pp. 441–446). Zaragoza: Universidad de Zaragoza, Libro de Actas.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hopkins, Ch. (1998). Picture, image, and experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Peirce, B. S. (1868). On a new list of categories. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 7, 287–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Goodman, N. (1976). Languages of art. Indianapolis: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kulvicki, J. (2006). On images. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Siegel, S. (2010). The contents of visual experience. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jordi Cat .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cat, J. (2017). Vague Pictures as Pictures. In: Fuzzy Pictures as Philosophical Problem and Scientific Practice. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 348. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47190-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47190-7_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47189-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47190-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics