Skip to main content

Liquidity Risk and Optimal Redemption Policies for Illiquid Investments

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Risk Management, Strategic Thinking and Leadership in the Financial Services Industry

Part of the book series: Contributions to Management Science ((MANAGEMENT SC.))

Abstract

We consider a risk-averse investor whose investable assets are held in a perfectly liquid asset (a portfolio of cash and liquid assets or a mutual fund) and another investment that has liquidity restrictions. The illiquidity could be due to restrictions on the investments (such as hedge funds) or due to nature of the asset held (such as real estate). The investor’s objective is to maximize the utility he derives from his terminal wealth at a future end date of his investment horizon. Furthermore the investor wants to hold his liquid wealth above a certain subsistence level, below which he incurs hefty borrowing costs or shortfall penalty. We consider the optimal conditions under which the investor must liquidate his illiquid assets. The redemption notification problem for hedge fund investors has certain affinity with the optimal control methods used in widely studied inventory management problems. We find that the optimal policy has a monotone structure similar in nature to inventory management problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The evidence of positive alpha in hedge fund returns has been well-documented in various empirical studies. See Ackermann et al. (1999), Agarwal and Naik (2004), Aragon (2007) and references therein for examples.

References

  • Ackermann C, McEnally R, Ravenscraft D (1999) The performance of hedge funds: risk, return, and incentives. J Financ 54(3):833–874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal V, Naik NY (2004) Risks and portfolio decisions involving hedge funds. Rev Financ Stud 17(1):63–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amihud Y, Mendelson H (1986) Asset pricing and the bid-ask spread. J Financ Econ 17(2):223–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aragon GO (2007) Share restrictions and asset pricing: evidence from the hedge fund industry. J Financ Econ 83(1):33–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bensoussan A, Chutani A, Sethi SP (2009) Optimal cash management under uncertainty. Oper Res Lett 37(6):425–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cetin C, Zapatero F (2015) Optimal acquisition of a partially hedgeable house. Math Financ Econ 9(2):123–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constantinides GM (1986) Capital market equilibrium with transaction costs. J Polit Econ 94:842–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis MH, Norman AR (1990) Portfolio selection with transaction costs. Math Oper Res 15(4):676–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eppen GD, Fama EF (1968) Solutions for cash-balance and simple dynamic-portfolio problems. J Bus 41(1):94–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eppen GD, Fama EF (1969) Cash balance and simple dynamic portfolio problems with proportional costs. Int Econ Rev 10(2):119–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eppen GD, Fama EF (1971) Three asset cash balance and dynamic portfolio problems. Manag Sci 17(5):311–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federgruen A, Zipkin P (1986a) An inventory model with limited production capacity and uncertain demands I. The average-cost criterion. Math Oper Res 11(2):193–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federgruen A, Zipkin P (1986b) An inventory model with limited production capacity and uncertain demands II. The discounted-cost criterion. Math Oper Res 11(2):208–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girgis NM (1968) Optimal cash balance levels. Manag Sci 15(3):130–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heyman DP (1973) A model for cash balance management. Manag Sci 19(12):1407–1413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heyman DP, Sobel MJ (1984) Stochastic models in operations research, vol II. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippman SA, McCall J (1976) The economics of job search: a survey. Econ Inq 14(2):155–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippman SA, McCall JJ (1986) An operational measure of liquidity. Am Econ Rev 76(1):43–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Longstaff FA (2001) Optimal portfolio choice and the valuation of illiquid securities. Rev Financ Stud 14(2):407–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nascimento J, Powell W (2010) Dynamic programming models and algorithms for the mutual fund cash balance problem. Manag Sci 56(5):801–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neave EH (1970) The stochastic cash balance problem with fixed costs for increases and decreases. Manag Sci 16(7):472–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özer Ö, Wei W (2004) Inventory control with limited capacity and advance demand information. Oper Res 52(6):988–1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penttinen MJ (1991) Myopic and stationary solutions for stochastic cash balance problems. Eur J Oper Res 52(2):155–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz ES, Tebaldi C (2006) Illiquid assets and optimal portfolio choice (No. w12633). National Bureau of Economic Research

    Google Scholar 

  • Shreve SE, Soner HM (1994) Optimal investment and consumption with transaction costs. Ann Appl Probabil: 609–692

    Google Scholar 

  • Stambaugh RF (2003) Liquidity risk and expected stock returns. J Polit Econ 111(3)

    Google Scholar 

  • Whisler WD (1967) A stochastic inventory model for rented equipment. Manag Sci 13(9):640–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan XS (2006) The determinants and implications of mutual fund cash holdings: theory and evidence. Financ Manag 35(2):67–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cenk C. Karahan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Karahan, C.C. (2017). Liquidity Risk and Optimal Redemption Policies for Illiquid Investments. In: Dinçer, H., Hacioğlu, Ü. (eds) Risk Management, Strategic Thinking and Leadership in the Financial Services Industry . Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47172-3_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics