Advertisement

Efficient and Load Balancing Strategy for Task Scheduling in Spatial Crowdsourcing

  • Dezhi SunEmail author
  • Yong Gao
  • Dan Yu
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9998)

Abstract

With the wide use of mobile devices, spatial crowdsourcing platforms are becoming popular. An important problem of spatial crowdsourcing is assigning a set of spatial tasks tagged with location and time for workers according to their location. In most cases, existing approaches usually take the matching algorithm as a fundamental step to solve this problem which aims to maximize the number of completed tasks. However, in the present of many spatial crowdsourcing platforms, how to assign the tasks at high efficiency and make a relatively fair schedule for multiple workers is a new challenge. In this paper, we study the problem of load balancing based task scheduling for multiple workers. We present fast and effective approximate algorithms for task scheduling problem. With both real and synthetic datasets, we verify the effectiveness of our proposed methods.

Keywords

Task Assignment Task Schedule Spatial Task Maximum Cost Location Entropy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Cao, C.C., Tong, Y., Chen, L., Jagadish, H.V.: Wisemarket: a new paradigm for managing wisdom of online social users. In: SIGKDD 2013, pp. 455–463 (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cranshaw, J., Toch, E., Hong, J., Kittur, A., Sadeh, N.: Bridging the gap between physical location and online social networks. In: Ubicomp 2010, pp. 119–128 (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Deng, D., Shahabi, C., Demiryurek, U.: Maximizing the number of worker’s self-selected tasks in spatial crowdsourcing. In: GIS 2013, pp. 324–333 (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Deng, D., Shahabi, C., Zhu, L.: Task matching and scheduling for multiple workers in spatial crowdsourcing (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gao, D., Tong, Y., She, J., Song, T., Chen, L., Xu, K.: Top-k team recommendation in spatial crowdsourcing. In: Cui, B., Zhang, N., Xu, J., Lian, X., Liu, D. (eds.) WAIM 2016. LNCS, vol. 9658, pp. 191–204. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-39937-9_15 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Huang, Y., Bastani, F., Jin, R., Wang, X.S.: Large scale real-time ridesharing with service guarantee on road networks. Proc. VLDB Endow. 7(14), 2017–2028 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jiang, D., Leung, K.W.T., Ng, W.: Fast topic discovery from web search streams. WWW 2014, 949–960 (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jiang, D., Leung, K.W.T., Vosecky, J., Ng, W.: Personalized query suggestion with diversity awareness. In: ICDE 2014, pp. 400–411 (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kazemi, L., Shahabi, C.: Geocrowd: enabling query answering with spatial crowdsourcing. In: GIS 2012, pp. 189–198 (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu, Q., Abdessalem, T., Wu, H., Yuan, Z., Bressan, S.: Cost minimization and social fairness for spatial crowdsourcing tasks. In: Navathe, S.B., et al. (eds.) DASFAA 2016. LNCS, vol. 9642, pp. 3–17. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-32025-0_1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    She, J., Tong, Y., Chen, L.: Utility-aware social event-participant planning. In: SIGMOD 2015, pp. 1629–1643 (2015)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    She, J., Tong, Y., Chen, L., Cao, C.C.: Conflict-aware event-participant arrangement. In: ICDE 2015, pp. 735–746 (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    She, J., Tong, Y., Chen, L., Cao, C.C.: Conflict-aware event-participant arrangement and its variant for online setting. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 28, 2281–2295 (2016). doi: 10.1109/TKDE.2016.2565468 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    To, H., Asghari, M., Deng, D., Shahabi, C.: Scawg: a toolbox for generating synthetic workload for spatial crowdsourcing (2016)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tong, Y., Cao, C.C., Chen, L.: TCS: efficient topic discovery over crowd-oriented service data. In: SIGKDD 2014, pp. 861–870 (2014)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tong, Y., Cao, C.C., Zhang, C.J., Li, Y., Chen, L.: Crowdcleaner: data cleaning for multi-version data on the web via crowdsourcing. In: ICDE 2014, pp. 1182–1185 (2014)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tong, Y., Chen, L., Cheng, Y., Yu, P.S.: Mining frequent itemsets over uncertain databases. Proc. VLDB Endow. 5(11), 1650–1661 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tong, Y., She, J., Ding, B., Chen, L., Wo, T., Xu, K.: Online minimum matching in real-time spatial data: experiments and analysis. Proc. VLDB Endow. 9, 1053–1064 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tong, Y., She, J., Ding, B., Wang, L., Chen, L.: Online mobile micro-task allocation in spatial crowdsourcing. In: ICDE 2016, pp. 49–60 (2016)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tong, Y., She, J., Meng, R.: Bottleneck-aware arrangement over event-based social networks: the max-min approach. World Wide Web J. 19(6), 1151–1177 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Software Development EnvironmentBeihang UniversityBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Yunnan Province Universities of the Diversity and Ecological Adaptive Evolution for Animals and Plants on YunGui PlateauQujing Normal UniversityQujingPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.China Standard Software Co., Ltd.BeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations