Skip to main content

Controlled Management of Confidentiality-Preserving Relational Interactions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Data Privacy Management and Security Assurance (DPM 2016, QASA 2016)

Abstract

This article builds on given fundamental concepts and a prototype implementation for history-aware and policy-driven inference control by means of a confidentiality-preserving security server, which mediates interactions between a relational database and a semi-honest (human) user. Within this already broad-ranging framework, we enhance the prototype towards efficient and effective user administration and monitoring by introducing and verifying two interactive and semi-automatic functionalities. The first one serves for the administration of global settings and the initial state of each user’s internal surrogate. Reacting on a submitted interaction request, the second functionality handles the security server’s dynamic selection of an admissible confinement method and its actual application, together with a corresponding state transition of the requesting user’s surrogate. These functionalities employ extendible descriptors of surrogate states, interaction requests, database instances and confinement methods, respectively, as a kind of security labels.

This work has been partially supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Council) under grant BI-311/12-2 and grant SFB 876/A5.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The components will be more precisely redefined in Sect. 4.

  2. 2.

    The names used in this article might differ from those found in the actual code.

References

  1. Abiteboul, S., Hull, R., Vianu, V.: Foundations of Databases. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bell, D.E., LaPadula, L.J.: Secure computer systems: A mathematical model, volume II. J. Comput. Secur. 4(2/3), 229–263 (1996). reprint of MITRE Corporation 1974

    Google Scholar 

  3. Biskup, J.: Inference-usability confinement by maintaining inference-proof views of an information system. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Eng. 7(1), 17–37 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Biskup, J., Bonatti, P.A.: Lying versus refusal for known potential secrets. Data Knowl. Eng. 38(2), 199–222 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Biskup, J., Bonatti, P.A.: Controlled query evaluation for enforcing confidentiality in complete information systems. Int. J. Inf. Sec. 3(1), 14–27 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Biskup, J., Bonatti, P.A.: Controlled query evaluation with open queries for a decidable relational submodel. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 50(1–2), 39–77 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Biskup, J., Embley, D.W., Lochner, J.-H.: Reducing inference control to access control for normalized database schemas. Inf. Process. Lett. 106(1), 8–12 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Biskup, J., Gogolin, C., Seiler, J., Weibert, T.: Inference-proof view update transactions with forwarded refreshments. J. Comput. Secur. 19, 487–529 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Biskup, J., Weibert, T.: Keeping secrets in incomplete databases. Int. J. Inf. Sec. 7(3), 199–217 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Biskup, J., Wiese, L.: A sound and complete model-generation procedure for consistent and confidentiality-preserving databases. Theor. Comput. Sci. 412, 4044–4072 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Ciriani, V., De Capitani di Vimercati, S., Foresti, S., Samarati, P.: k-Anonymity. In: Yu, T., Jajodia, S. (eds.) Secure Data Management in Decentralized Systems. Advances in Information Security, vol. 33, pp. 323–353. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-27696-0_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Dolzhenko, E., Ligatti, J., Reddy, S.: Modeling runtime enforcement with mandatory results automata. Int. J. Inf. Sec. 14(1), 47–60 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Farkas, C., Jajodia, S.: The inference problem: a survey. SIGKDD Explor. 4(2), 6–11 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fung, B.C.M., Wang, K., Fu, A.W.-C., Yu, P.S.: Introduction to Privacy-Preserving Data Publishing - Concepts and Techniques. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Halpern, J.Y., O’Neill, K.R.: Secrecy in multiagent systems. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. Secur. 12(1), 5.1–5.47 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. McCune, W.: Prover9 and Mace4. http://www.cs.unm.edu/~mccune/prover9/, 2005–2010

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joachim Biskup .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Biskup, J., Menzel, R., Zarouali, J. (2016). Controlled Management of Confidentiality-Preserving Relational Interactions. In: Livraga, G., Torra, V., Aldini, A., Martinelli, F., Suri, N. (eds) Data Privacy Management and Security Assurance. DPM QASA 2016 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9963. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47072-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47072-6_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47071-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47072-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics