Abstract
In system design, the distinction between a logical architecture at design level and the corresponding physical distributed architecture at implementation level is recognised as good practice. In this paper we show how we can define logical architectures in which variation points can be defined explicitly. Such architectures define families of systems, and should therefore be useful for defining such families in IoT.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Notwithstanding Broy’s view of software architectures as task level artefacts, as reflected by the automotive software standard AUTOSAR (www.autosar.org).
- 2.
A hierarchical representation of a product family in terms of features.
- 3.
- 4.
The example has been created using our FX-MAN Eclipse tool.
References
Asikainen, T., Männistö, T., Soininen, T.: Kumbang: a domain ontology for modelling variability in software product families. Adv. Eng. Inf. 21, 23–40 (2007)
Asikainen, T., Soininen, T., Xu, Y.: A koala-based approach for modelling and deploying configurable software product families. In: van der Linden, F.J. (ed.) PFE 2003. LNCS, vol. 3014, pp. 225–249. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Bass, L., Clements, P., Kazman, R.: Software Architecture in Practice. SEI Series in Software Engineering, 3rd edn. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2012)
Broy, M.: Challenges in automotive software engineering. In: Leon, J., Osterweil, H., Rombach, D., Soffa, M.L. (edr.) 28th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 33–42. ACM (2006)
Clements, P., Northrop, L.: Software Product Lines: Practices and Patterns. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2002)
Clements, P.: Biglever newsletter: from the ple frontline - paul’s three surprises: part 3
Cola, S.D., Lau, K.-K., Tran, C., Qian, C., Arshad, R., Christou, V.: A component model for software product families. In: Paper submitted to the 18th International ACM Sigsoft Symposium on Component-Based Software Engineering (2015)
Cola, S., Tran, C., Lau, K.-K., Celesti, A., Fazio, M.: A heterogeneous approach for developing applications with FIWARE GEs. In: Dustdar, S., Leymann, F., Villari, M. (eds.) ESOCC 2015. LNCS, vol. 9306, pp. 65–79. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24072-5_5
Dashofy, E.M., van der Hoek, A., Taylor, R.N.: A comprehensive approach for the development of modular software architecture description languages. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. (TOSEM) 14, 199–245 (2005)
Fazio, M., Celesti, A., Puliafito, A., Villari, M.: An integrated system for advanced multi-risk management based on cloud for IoT. In: Re, G.L. (ed.) Advances onto the Internet of Things. AISC, vol. 260, pp. 253–269. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)
Fazio, M., Puliafito, A.: Cloud4sens: a cloud-based architecture for sensor controlling and monitoring. IEEE Commun. Mag. 53(3), 41–47 (2015)
Galster, M., Avgeriou, P., Weyns, D., Männistö, T.: Variability in software architecture: current practice and challenges. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 36(5), 30–32 (2011)
Garlan, D.: Software architecture: a travelogue. In: Proceedings of the on Future of Software Engineering, FOSE, pp. 29–39. ACM, New York (2014)
Haber, A., Rendel, H., Rumpe, B., Schaefer, I., Van Der Linden, F.: Hierarchical variability modeling for software architectures. In: 15th International Software Product Line Conference (SPLC), pp. 150–159. IEEE (2011)
He, N., Kroening, D., Wahl, T., Lau, K.-K., Taweel, F., Tran, C., Rümmer, P., Sharma, S.: Component-based design and verification in X-MAN. In: Proceedings of Embedded Real Time Software and Systems (2012)
Tran, C., Saudrais, S., Lau, K.-K., Štěpán, P., Tchakaloff, B.: A holistic (component-based) approach to autosar designs. In: Proceedings of 39th EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, pp. 203–207. IEEE (2013)
Kyo, C., Kang, J.L., Donohoe, P.: Feature-oriented product line engineering. IEEE Softw. 19(4), 58–65 (2002)
Kruchten, P.: The Rational Unified Process: an Introduction. Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston (2004)
Lau, K.-K., Wang, Z.: Software component models. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 33(10), 709–724 (2007)
Lau, K.: Software component models: past, present and future. In: Proceedings of the 17th International ACM Sigsoft Symposium on Component-based Software Engineering, pp. 185–186. ACM (2014)
Medvidovic, N., Taylor, R.N.: A classification and comparison framework for software architecture description languages. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 26(1), 70–93 (2000)
Nakagawa, E.Y.: Reference architectures and variability: Current status and future perspectives. In: Proceedings of the WICSA/ECSA 2012 Companion Volume, WICSA/ECSA 2012, pp. 159–162. ACM, New York (2012)
Pérez, J., DÃaz, J., Costa-Soria, C., Garbajosa, J.: Plastic partial components: a solution to support variability in architectural components. In: Joint Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture, & European Conference on Software Architecture, WICSA/ECSA, pp. 221–230. IEEE (2009)
Pohl, K., Böckle, G., Van Der Linden, F.: Software Product Line Engineering: Foundations, Principles, and Techniques. Springer, Berlin (2005)
Pretschner, A., Broy, M., Kruger, I.H., Stauner, T.: Software engineering for automotive systems: a roadmap. In: Future of Software Engineering, FOSE 2007, pp. 55–71. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (2007)
Sinnema, M., Deelstra, S., Nijhuis, J., Dannenberg, R.B.: COVAMOF: a framework for modeling variability in software product families. In: Nord, R.L. (ed.) SPLC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3154, pp. 197–213. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
van der Hoek, A., Mikic-Rakic, M., Roshandel, R., Medvidovic, N.: Taming architectural evolution. In: Proceedings of the 8th European Software Engineering Conference Held Jointly with 9th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering, ESEC/FSE-9, pp. 1–10. ACM, New York (2001)
van Ommering, R., van der Linden, F., Kramer, J., Magee, J.: The Koala component model for consumer electronics software. IEEE Computer (2000)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering
About this paper
Cite this paper
Di Cola, S., Lau, KK., Tran, C., Qian, C. (2016). Towards Defining Families of Systems in IoT: Logical Architectures with Variation Points. In: Mandler, B., et al. Internet of Things. IoT Infrastructures. IoT360 2015. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 169. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47063-4_43
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47063-4_43
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47062-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47063-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)