Skip to main content

Combating Illegal Excavations in Cahuachi: Ancient Problems and Modern Technologies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Ancient Nasca World

Abstract

Illegal excavations represent one of the main risk factors which affect the archaeological heritage in Peru, in general, and in Nasca region, in particular. Looting in Peru has an ancient “tradition”, starting from the Spanish Conquistadors (and before); but since the 1960s, it has been strongly intensifying to supply the growing national and international markets. After the famous plundering of Sipán, an agreement was reached with the United States in 1997 to restrict the import of Pre-Columbian and ethnographic material from Peru. But, unfortunately, since the signing of the bilateral agreements with the United States, the traffic has shifted and been directed more towards Northern and Central Europe. Steps were taken to prevent illegal excavations through the forced return of looted archaeological objects; but this only partially addressed the problem because, even if the objects have been returned, the archaeological context from which they were stolen cannot be recovered. To stop, or at least limit, the illicit trade, it would be necessary to improve the present national and international laws and make available the resources necessary for their enforcement and for a wider understanding and systematic monitoring of the archaeological areas by using effective techniques of surveillance, including remote sensing. This chapter deals with the results obtained by using an automatic procedure applied to multitemporal satellite images of some areas in the Río Grande de Nasca Drainage for the detection of looted areas. The rate of success in detecting changes related to the archaeological looting has been successfully tested in significant selected areas using complementary tools such as Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV ), a Global Positioning System (GPS ), Ground-penetrating radar (GPR ), and field surveys . Satellite technologies can provide reliable information: (i) to quantify the looting phenomenon even if it is on an “industrial scale” over large areas, and (ii) to set up a systematic monitoring tool to trace the illicit trade in antiquities. This study has implications for the protection of archaeological sites, not only in Nasca but also across the world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Summarizing, the current legislation on the protection of cultural heritage, it “expresses an interest superior to private property rights” (Karlzén 2010; Martorell-Carreño 2006). However the Constitution assures the right of private ownership over movable objects, belonging to cultural heritage, which can be traded domestically. Unauthorized excavation, extraction, and export are forbidden and criminalized by the Penal Code. Excavations can made only by archaeologists if authorized, following a complex procedure. New findings belong to the state and never can come legally into the hands of a private person.

  2. 2.

    About Cahuachi, the reader is referred to Chaps. 14, 15, and 19 by Orefici (2016a, b, c).

  3. 3.

    According to the derogatory comments of witness to some “looters of finesse” interviewed by Helaine Silverman.

  4. 4.

    Soil generally characterized by angles of friction ranging 28–32° and cohesion of 5–10 kPa (Cestelli Guidi 1987).

  5. 5.

    With horizontal, vertical and rotation speed ranging from 0.1 to 15 m/s, 0.1 to 6 m/s and 200 °/s, respectively.

  6. 6.

    The photogrammetric processing of digital images for generating 3D spatial data was performed by using Photoscan software (Agisoft PhotoScan User Manual 2014). The processing includes the following steps: (i) the selection and loading of photos, captured with correct overlap requirement (60 % of side overlap +80 % of forward overlap) aimed at minimizing blind-zones; (ii) computation of camera position and orientation for each photo, alignment of photos and building of a sparse point cloud; (iii) generation of a dense-point cloud model which enables calculating the depth information for each camera position; (iv) building 3d model polygonal mesh; and (v) and, finally, building model texture.

References

  • Agisoft PhotoScan User Manual: Professional Edition (2014), Version 1.1

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselin L (1995) Local indicators of spatial association LISA. Geogr Anal 27:93–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atwood R (2006) Stealing history: tomb raiders, smugglers, and the looting of the ancient World. St. Martin’s Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Bao S, Henry MS (1996) Heterogeneity issues in local measurements of spatial association. Geog Syst 3:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Bao S (1999) An overview of spatial statistics. University of Michigan, China Data Center, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Batievski J, Velarde J (2006) The protection of cultural patrimony in Peru. In: Hoffmann BT (ed) Art and cultural heritage: law, policy, and practice; Art and cultural heritage law, policy, and practice. Cambridge University Press, pp 100–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitelli G, Mandanici E (2016) Geomatics applications in Cahuachi and Nasca territory (Chap. 23). In Lasaponara R, Masini N, Orefici (eds) Ancient Nasca world. New insights from science and archaeology. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodie N, Renfrew C (2005) Looting and the world’s archaeological heritage: the inadequate response. Annu Rev Anthropol 34:343–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casana J (2015) Satellite imagery-based analysis of archaeological looting in Syria. Near East Archaeol 78(3):342

    Google Scholar 

  • Casana J, Panahipour M (2014) Satellite-based monitoring of looting and damage to archaeological sites in Syria. J East Mediterr Archaeol Heritage Stud 2(2):128–150. Doi:10.5325/jeasmedarcherstu.2.2.0128

    Google Scholar 

  • Cestelli Guidi C (1987) Geotecnica e tecnica delle fondazioni 1. U. Hoepli, Milano, p 1987

    Google Scholar 

  • Contreras DA (2010) Huaqueros and remote sensing imagery: assessing looting damage in the Viru Valley, Peru. Antiquity 84(324):544–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delle Rose M (2016) The geology of Cahuachi (Chap. 3). In: Lasaponara R, Masini N, Orefici (eds) Ancient Nasca world. New insights from science and archaeology. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Doering HU (1958) Bericht über archaologische Feldarbeiten in Perú. Ethnos 23(2–4):67–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrest C (2010), Craig international law and the protection of cultural heritage. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerdau-Radonic K, Herrera H (2010) Why dig looted tombs? Two examples and some answers from Keushu (Ancash highlands, Peru. Bulletins et Memoires de la Societe d’Anthropologie de Paris 22(3–4):145–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getis A, Getis O, Keith J (1992) The analysis of spatial association by the use of distance statistics. Geog Anal 24:189–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlzén K (2010) Cultural property and claims for repatriation. Master’s thesis on cultural property. Göteborgs Universitet

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasaponara R, Masini N (2010) Facing the archaeological looting in Peru by local spatial autocorrelation statistics of Very high resolution satellite imagery. In: Taniar D et al (eds) Proceedings of ICSSA, The 2010 international conference on computational science and its application, Fukuoka-Japan, 23–26 March 2010. Springer, Berlin, pp 261–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasaponara R, Masini N (2012) Image enhancement, feature extraction and geospatial analysis in an archaeological perspective. In: Lasaponara R, Masini N (eds) Satellite remote sensing: a new tool for archaeology. Springer, Berlin, pp 17–64. ISBN 978-90-481-8800-0

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lasaponara R, Danese M, Masini N (2012) Satellite-based monitoring of archaeological looting in Peru. In: Lasaponara R, Masini N (eds) Satellite remote sensing: a new tool for archaeology. Springer, Berlin, pp 177–193. Doi:10.1007/978-90-481-8801-7_8. ISBN 978-90-481-8800-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasaponara R, Leucci G, Masini N, Persico R (2014) Investigating archaeological looting using satellite images and georadar: the experience in Lambayeque in North Peru. J Archaeol Sci 42(2014):216–230. Doi:10.1016/j.jas.2013.10.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasaponara R, Leucci G, Masini N, Persico R, Scardozzi G (2016) Towards an operative use of remote sensing for exploring the past using satellite data: the case study of Hierapolis (Turkey). Remote Sens Environ 174:148–164. Doi:10.1016/j.rse.2015.12.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luke C (2006) Diplomats, banana cowboys, and archaeologists in Western Honduras: a history of the trade in Pre-Columbian materials. Int J Cult Property 13(1):25–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martorell-Carreño A (2006) Cultural patrimony and property rights in Peru. In: Hoffmann BT (ed) Art and cultural heritage: law, policy, and practice; art and cultural heritage law, policy, and practice. Cambridge University Press, pp 105–108

    Google Scholar 

  • McAllister M (1991) Looting and vandalism of archaeological resources on federal and Indian lands in the United States. In: Smith GS, Ehrenhard JE (eds) Protecting the past. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 93–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Nex F, Remondino F (2013) UAV for 3D mapping applications: a review. Appl Geomatics 6:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orefici G (1992) Nasca. Archeologia per una ricostruzione storica. Jaca Books, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  • Orefici G (2016) The Ceremonial Center of Cahuachi: its origins and evolution (Chap. 14). In Lasaponara R, Masini N, Orefici (eds) Ancient Nasca world. New insights from science and archaeology. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Orefici G (2016) Cahuachi architecture (Chap. 15). In Lasaponara R, Masini N, Orefici (eds) Ancient Nasca world. New insights from science and archaeology. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Orefici G (2016) The decline of Cahuachi and the end of the Nasca theocracy (Chap. 19). In: Lasaponara R, Masini N, Orefici (eds) Ancient Nasca world. New insights from science and archaeology. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Parcak S (2007) Satellite remote sensing methods for monitoring archaeological tells in the Middle East. J Field Archaeol 32(1):65–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proulx BB (2013) Archaeological site looting in “Glocal” perspective: nature, scope, and frequency. Am J Archaeol 117(1):111–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman H (1993) Cahuachi in the ancient Nasca World. University of Iowa Press, Iowa City

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith KL (2005) Looting and the politics of archaeological knowledge in northern Peru. Ethnos 70(2):149–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone EC (2008) Patterns of looting in Southern Iraq. Antiquity 82:125–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tapete D, Cigna F, Masini N, Lasaponara R (2013) Prospection and monitoring of the archaeological heritage of Nasca, Peru, with ENVISAT ASAR. Archaeol Prospect 20:133–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tapete D, Cigna F, Donoghue DNM (2016) ‘Looting marks’ in space-borne SAR imagery: measuring rates of archaeological looting in Apamea (Syria) with TerraSAR-X staring spotlight. Remote Sens Environ 178:42–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uhle M (1914) The Nazca pottery of Ancient Peru. Proc Davenport Acad Sci 13:1–46

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (1956) Recommendation on international principles applicable to archaeological excavations

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (1970) Convention on the means of prohibiting and preventing the illicit import, export and transfer of ownership of cultural property

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (2001) Convention on the protection of the underwater cultural heritage

    Google Scholar 

  • UNIDROIT (1995) UNIDROIT Convention on stolen or illegally exported cultural objects. Rome, 24 June 1995

    Google Scholar 

  •  Van Ess M, Becker H, Fassbinder J, Kiefl R, Lingenfelder I, Schreier G, Zevenbergen A (2006) Detection of Looting Activities at Archaeological Sites in Iraq Using Ikonos Imagery. Angewandte Geoinformatik, Beitra¨ge zum 18. Wiechmann-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp 668–678. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-16190824

  • Vella C, Bocancea E, Urban TM, Knodell AR, Tuttle CA, Alcock SA (2015) Looting and vandalism around a World Heritage Site: Documenting modern damage to archaeological heritage in Petra’s hinterland. J Field Archaeol 40(2):221–235

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The DEM in Fig. 25.11 has been processed by Antonio Pecci of CNR/IBAM. The GPR prospections have been performed and processed by Luigi Capozzoli, Enzo Rizzo of CNR-IMAA and Gerardo Romano of University of Bari (Fig. 25.14c–e). The 3d visualization of GPR iso-amplitude in Fig. 25.14f has been made by Giovanni Leucci of CNR-IBAM. GNSS kinematic surveys have been performed by Gabriele Bitelli and Emanuele Mandanici of University of Bologna.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rosa Lasaponara .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lasaponara, R., Masini, N. (2016). Combating Illegal Excavations in Cahuachi: Ancient Problems and Modern Technologies. In: Lasaponara, R., Masini, N., Orefici, G. (eds) The Ancient Nasca World. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47052-8_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47052-8_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47050-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47052-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics