Skip to main content

Calendar Anomalies in Stock Markets During Financial Crisis: The S&P 500 Case

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Contributions to Economics ((CE))

Abstract

In this study we try to briefly revise the day of the week effect (DOW) and to examine why there are conflicting empirical results through the time. Moreover, we try to add a new-alternative view to the specific area of study, adding a further possible explanation in calendar anomalies field of study. Specifically, we try to examine if investors’ weekday behavior changes depend on the financial trend. For example, let suppose that there are evidence that Mondays are positive returns days, but there are signs for an upcoming financial crisis. Could this general believed practical rule be strong enough in order to be sustainable even during financial crisis period or does it change? In order to analyze this issue providing empirical support, we examine the US stock market and the S&P index for the time period 2000–2013. The results confirm our assumption that the financial trend influences the weekly stock returns’ pattern, which may be an alternative explanation for the conflicting empirical findings that have been documented in the literature up today.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Usually turn of the month days are defined as the last day of a month and the first three trading days of the following month.

  2. 2.

    This study examines latter data questions Sias and Starks (1995) findings.

  3. 3.

    The term day of the week is generally used because quite often in the literature is reported a week pattern which is not the weekend effect (e.g. positive return day Tuesday and negative Wednesday).

  4. 4.

    http://us.spindices.com/indices/equity/sp-500

  5. 5.

    Ülkü and Prodan (2013) suggest that when today’s closing price (Pt) crosses the n-days moving average MA(n) from below we buy, but when the Pt crosses the MA(n) from above we sell. n is the time period for which we calculate the moving average. This period could be short-term (n < 10), medium term (10 < n < 150) or long term (n > 150).

  6. 6.

    Local maximum is a mathematical term for the peak.

  7. 7.

    Friedrich Nietzsche’s said “The future influences the present just as much as the past”. Following this quote we thought that investors forecasts influence their current behavior and this was the starting point which finally helped us resolve the financial trend definition issue.

  8. 8.

    The 4th sub-period’s max value, according to the data which we had available, is the 18/9/2013 (1725.52), but we use as end of period date 16/10/2013 (1721.54) in order to make some more observations and because the difference was not significant enough to change our conclusions (we run the model taking the 18/9/2013 as period-end date). All these data are available upon request.

  9. 9.

    This partly confirms our prior characterization for the total period as no-trend period.

  10. 10.

    The leptokurtosis of these three distributions is a sign that linear models may not be adequate to explain the specific time series’ behavior (Vasileiou 2015).

  11. 11.

    We run the OLS models and we find significant ARCH effect problems. Moreover, if we adopt the OLS (assuming that the ARCH effect does not exist) the results are different than the final. These data are available upon request. The appropriate model selection is crucial, because (i) through time some studies which report the weekend effect fade, are called in question due to the violations of the OLS assumptions in the returns (Connolly 1989; Alford and Guffey 1996) and (ii) may be the reason for the conflicting findings.

  12. 12.

    T-GARCH or GJR model named from the authors’ initials Glosten, Jagannathan and Runkle (1993), and (ii) the exponential GARCH (EGARCH) model proposed by Nelson (1991).

  13. 13.

    These data are available upon request.

  14. 14.

    The Akaike and Schwartz criterions present better results if we use the t-statistics instead of the Generalized Error Distribution (GED) proposed by Nelson (1991).

  15. 15.

    Generally, similar to related studies when the two criteria suggest different models, lag orders the SIC is preferred to the AIC because: (i) it corrects the over-fitting nature of the AIC, and (ii) it is asymptotically consistent (Koehler and Murphree 1988). However, in most of the cases both criteria suggest similar results.

  16. 16.

    More statistical information are available upon request.

References

  • Abraham A, Ikenberry D (1994) The individual investor and the weekend effect. J Financ Quant Anal 29:263–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal A, Tandon K (1994) Anomalies or illusions? Evidence from the stock markets in eighteen countries. J Int Money Financ 13(1):83–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alford A, Guffey D (1996) A re-examination of international seasonalities. J Financ Econ 5:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Branch B, Jung J, Yang T (2001) The monday merger effect. Int Rev Financ Anal 10(1):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks C (2008) Introductory econometrics for finance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brusa J, Liu P, Schulman C (2005) Weekend effect, ‘reverse’ weekend effect, and investor trading activities. J Bus Financ Acc 32:1495–1517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan SH, Leung WK, Wang K (2004) The impact of institutional investors on the Monday seasonal. J Bus 77:967–986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen H, Singal V (2003) Role of speculative short sales in price formation: the case of the weekend effect. J Financ 58:685–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly R (1989) An examination of the robustness of the weekend effect. J Financ Quant Anal 24(2):133–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross F (1973) The behavior of stock prices on Fridays and Mondays. Financ Anal J 29:67–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama EF (1970) Efficient capital markets: a review of theory and empirical work. J Financ 25(2):383–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French K (1980) Stock returns and the weekend effect. J Financ Econ 8:55–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glosten LR, Jagannathan R, Runkle DE (1993) On the relation between the expected value and the volatility of the nominal excess return on stocks. J Financ 48:1779–1801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu AX (2004) The reversing weekend effect: evidence from the U.S. equity markets. Rev Quant Financ Acc 22:5–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe J, Westerfield R (1985) The week-end effect in common stock returns: the international evidence. J Financ 40:433–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keim D, Stambaugh R (1984) A further investigation of the weekend effect in stock returns. J Financ 39:819–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koehler A, Murphree E (1988) A comparison of the Akaike and Schwarz criteria for selecting model order. J R Stat Soc 37(2):187–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakonishok J, Maberly E (1990) The weekend effect: trading patterns of individual and institutional investors. J Financ 45:231–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills TC, Siriopoulos C, Markellos RN, Harizanis D (2000) Seasonality in the Athens stock exchange. Appl Financ Econ 10(2):137–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson DB (1991) Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns: a new approach. Econometrica 59:347–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwert GW (2003) Anomalies and market efficiency. In: Constantinides G et al (eds) Handbook of the economics of finance, Chap 17. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Sias R, Starks L (1995) The day-of-the-week anomaly: the role of institutional investors. Financ Anal J 12:58–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syed AB, Sadorsky P (2006) Day-of-the-week effects in emerging stock markets. Appl Econ Lett 13:621–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ülkü N, Prodan E (2013) Drivers of technical trend-following rules’ profitability in world stock markets. Int Rev Financ Anal 30:214–229. doi:10.1016/j.irfa.2013.08.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasileiou E (2015) Long live day of the week patterns and the financial trends’ role. Evidence from the Greek stock market during the Euro Era (2002–12). Invest Manag Financ Innovat 12(3):19–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasileiou E, Samitas A (2014) Does the financial crisis influence the month and the trading month effects? Evidence from the Athens stock exchange. Stud Econ Financ 32(2):181–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evangelos Vasileiou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vasileiou, E. (2017). Calendar Anomalies in Stock Markets During Financial Crisis: The S&P 500 Case. In: Hacioğlu, Ü., Dinçer, H. (eds) Global Financial Crisis and Its Ramifications on Capital Markets. Contributions to Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47021-4_34

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics