Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Harvest of Polar Bears Across the Circumpolar North

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Marine Mammal Welfare

Part of the book series: Animal Welfare ((AWNS,volume 17))

  • 3163 Accesses

Abstract

Harvest of polar bears by aboriginal peoples has occurred for millennia across the circumpolar Arctic. While harvest for sport and the commercial fur trade increased dramatically as southerners expanded into the Arctic, the 1973 international Agreement for the Conservation of Polar Bears curtailed harvest largely to aboriginal peoples. This Agreement, catalyzed by global concern for declining polar bear populations, is a hallmark for international cooperation in conservation. In Russia, polar bear harvest has been illegal since 1957, although there are concerns of poaching by local people for food security and also for the black market fur trade. Norway banned all harvest with their ratification of the Agreement. The USA allows for polar bear harvest by the Inupiat of Alaska. Quotas for the two populations shared with the USA are determined by an international user-to-user agreement between aboriginal people of Alaska and Canada and an international agreement between the USA and Russia, respectively. In Greenland, polar bears are harvested by professional Inuit hunters under a quota system, currently based on historic numbers. In most of Canada, where two-thirds of the world’s polar bears are harvested, anyone can harvest a polar bear but only within a quota system assigned to and managed by Inuit communities. This harvest is based not only on scientific information, but also on historic levels by treaty and local traditional ecological knowledge. Globally, polar bear harvest averages 798 (44 SD) per year. The vast majority is for subsistence, with 6% for sport (Canada), and a lesser proportion for defense of life and property. The legal international market for polar bear hides is supplied only by exports from Canada. Climate change poses a greater threat to polar bears than do the current levels of harvest. However, habitat change and harvest interact because of the increasing use of land by polar bears. Further, there are scientific and conservation questions about the appropriateness of harvesting polar bears, even for subsistence, from populations that are declining due to climate change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aars J, Lunn NJ, Derocher AE (2006) Polar bears. In: Proceedings of the 14th working meeting of the IUCN/SSC polar bear specialist group. Seattle, WA, USA, 20–24 June 2005. Occasional Paper of the IUCN Species Survival Commission No. 32

    Google Scholar 

  • Amstrup SC, Stirling I, Lentfer JW (1986) Past and present status of polar bears in Alaska. Wildl Soc Bull 14:241–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon. (2005) Polar bear management memoranda of understanding between community hunting and Trappers’ organizations and the Department of Environment, Government of Nunavut, Iqaluit, Nunavut

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon. (2010) Strategy for polar bear conservation in the Russian Federation. Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment of the Russian Federation, Russia. 59 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon. (2016) Inuvialuit settlement region submission to the polar bear technical committee meeting. Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Atwood T, Peacock E, McKinney MA, Lillie K, Wilson R, Douglas DC, Miller S, Terletzky P (2016) Rapid environmental change drives increased land use by an Arctic marine predator. PLoS One 11(6):e0155932. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0155932

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Belikov SE, Boltunov AN (1998) Problems with the conservation and sustainable use of polar bears in the Russian Arctic (International Association for Bear Research and Management). Ursus 10:119–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Born EW, Heilmann A, Kielsen Holm L, Laidre KL (2011) Polar bears in Northwest Greenland—an interview survey about the catch and the climate. Monographs on Greenland, vol 351 and Man & Society, vol 41. Museum Tusculanum Press, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Google Scholar 

  • Brower CD, Carpenter A, Branigan ML, Calvert W, Evans T, Fischbach AS, Nagy JA, Schliebe S, Stirling I (2002) The polar bear management agreement for the southern Beaufort Sea: an evaluation of the first ten years of a unique conservation agreement. Arctic 55(4):362–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper EWT (2015) Review and analysis of Canadian trade in polar bears from 2005–2014: report prepared for the parties to the 1973 agreement on the conservation of polar bears. Environment Canada, Ottawa, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Derocher AE (2005) Population ecology of polar bears at Svalbard, Norway. Popul Ecol 47(3):267–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derocher AE, Aars J, Amstrup SC, Cutting A, Lunn NJ, Molnar PK, Obbard ME, Stirling I, Thiemann GW, Vongraven D, Wiig O, York G (2013) Rapid ecosystem change and polar bear conservation. Conserv Lett 6(5):368–375. doi:10.1111/conl.12009

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowsley M, Wenzel GW (2008) “The time of the most polar bears”: a co-management conflict in Nunavut. Arctic 61(2):177–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Durner GM, Douglas DC, Nielson RM, Amstrup SC, McDonald TL, Stirling I, Mauritzen M, Born EW, Wiig O, DeWeaver E, Serreze MC, Belikov SE, Holland MM, Maslanik J, Aars J, Bailey DA, Derocher AE (2009) Predicting 21st-century polar bear habitat distribution from global climate models. Ecol Monogr 79(1):25–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyck MG (2016) Submission to the 45th annual Canadian federal/provincial/territorial polar bear technical committee. Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Flyger V (1967) The polar bear: a matter for international concern. Arctic 20(3):148–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foote L, Wenzel GW (2009) Polar bear conservation hunting in Canada: economics, culture and unintended consequences. In: Freeman MMR, Foote L (eds) Inuit, polar bears and sustainable use: local, national and international perspectives. CCI Press, Edmonton

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler CW (1981) Density dependence as related to life history strategy. Ecology 62:602–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman MMR, Wenzel GW (2006) The nature and significance of polar bear conservation hunting in the Canadian Arctic. Arctic 59(1):21–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton SG, de la Guardia LC, Derocher AE, Sahanatien V, Tremblay B, Huard D (2014) Projected polar Bear Sea ice habitat in the Canadian Arctic archipelago. PLoS One 9(11). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0113746

  • Henri D, Gilchrist HG, Peacock E (2010) Understanding and managing wildlife in Hudson Bay under a changing climate: some recent contributions from Inuit and Cree ecological knowledge. In: Loseto LL, Ferguson SH, Gilchrist HG (eds) A little less Arctic: top predators in the world’s largest northern Inland Sea. Springer, Hudson Bay, pp 267–289

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter CM, Caswell H, Runge MC, Regehr EV, Amstrup SC, Stirling I (2010) Climate change threatens polar bear populations: a stochastic demographic analysis. Ecology 91(10):2883–2897

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McLoughlin PD, Taylor MK, Messier F (2005) Conservation risks of male-selective harvest for mammals with low reproductive potential. J Wildl Manag 69(4):1592–1600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molnar PK, Derocher AE, Lewis MA, Taylor MK (2007) Modelling the mating system of polar bears: a mechanistic approach to the Allee effect. Proc R Soc B 275:217–226

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Nageak BP, Brower CD, Schliebe SL (1991) Polar bear management in the southern Beaufort Sea: an agreement between the Inuvialuit game council and north slope borough fish and game committee. T N Am Wildl Nat Res 56:337–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Obbard ME, Stapleton S, Middel KR, Thibault I, Brodeur V, Jutras C (2015) Estimating the abundance of the southern Hudson Bay polar bear subpopulation with aerial surveys. Polar Biol 38(10):1713–1725. doi:10.1007/s00300-015-1737-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obbard ME, Cattet MRL, Howe EJ, Middel KR, Newton EJ, Kolenosky GB, Abraham KF, Greenwood CJ (2016) Trends in body condition in polar bears (Ursus maritimus) from the southern Hudson Bay subpopulation in relation to changes in sea ice. Arctic Sci 2(1):15–32. doi:10.1139/as-2015-0027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagano AM, Peacock E, McKinney MA (2014) Remote biopsy darting of polar bears: implications for monitoring abundance, diet, and condition. Mar Mamm Sci 30(1):169–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peacock E, Dyck MG, Piugattuk F (2007) Submission to the polar bear technical committee. Department of Environment, Government of Nunavut, Igloolik, Nunavut

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacock E, Derocher AE, Theimann GW, Stirling I (2011) Conservation and management of Canada’s polar bears in a changing Arctic. Can J Zool 89:371–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peacock E, Taylor MK, Laake J, Stirling I (2013) Population ecology of polar bears in Davis Strait, Canada and Greenland. J Wildl Manag 77(3):463–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prestrud P, Stirling I (1994) The international polar bear agreement and the current status of polar bear conservation. Aquat Mamm 20(3):113–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Prevett JP, Kolenosky GB (1983) Productivity and maternity denning of polar bears in Ontario. Int Conf Bear Res Manag 5:238–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Regehr EV, Lunn NJ, Amstrup SC, Stirling I (2007) Effects of earlier sea ice breakup on survival and population size of polar bears in western Hudson Bay. J Wildl Manag 71(8):2673–2683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regehr EV, Hunter CM, Caswell H, Amstrup SC, Stirling I (2010) Survival and breeding of polar bears in the southern Beaufort Sea in relation to sea ice. J Anim Ecol 79:117–127. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01603.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rode KD, Amstrup SC, Regehr EV (2010) Reduced body size and cub recruitment in polar bears associated with sea ice decline. Ecol Appl 20(3):768–782

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rode KD, Peacock E, Taylor MK, Stirling I, Born EW, Laidre KL, Wiig O (2012) A tale of two polar bear populations (Ursus maritimus): ice habitat, harvest, and body condition. Popul Ecol 54(1):3–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rode KD, Regehr EV, Douglas DC, Durner G, Derocher AE, Thiemann GW, Budge SM (2014) Variation in the response of an Arctic top predator experiencing habitat loss: feeding and reproductive ecology of two polar bear populations. Glob Chang Biol 20(1):76–88. doi:10.1111/gcb.12339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sahanatien V, Derocher AE (2012) Monitoring sea ice habitat fragmentation for polar bear conservation. Anim Conserv 15(4):397–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stapleton S, Atkinson S, Hedman D, Garshelis D (2014) Revisiting western Hudson Bay: using aerial surveys to update polar bear abundance in a sentinel population. Biol Conserv 170:38–47. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2013.12.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stapleton S, Peacock E, Garshelis D (2015) Aerial surveys suggest long-term stability in the seasonally ice-free Foxe Basin (Nunavut) polar bear population. Mar Mamm Sci 32(1):181–201. doi:10.1111/mms.12251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stapleton S, Peacock E, Garshelis D (2016) Aerial surveys suggest long-term stability in the seasonally ice-free Foxe Basin (Nunavut) polar bear population. Mar Mamm Sci 32(1):181–201. doi:10.1111/mms.12251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stirling I, Lunn NJ, Iacozza J (1999) Long-term trends in the population ecology of polar bears in western Hudson Bay in relation to climatic change. Arctic 52(3):294–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stirling I, McDonald TL, Richardson ES, Regehr EV, Amstrup SC (2011) Polar bear population status in the northern Beaufort Sea, Canada, 1971–2006. Ecol Appl 21(3):859–876

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor MK, Bunnell F, DeMaster D, Schweinsburg R, Smith J (1987a) ANURSUS: a population analysis system for polar bears (Ursus maritimus). Int Conf Bear Res Manag 7:117–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor MK, DeMaster DP, Bunnell FL, Schweinsburg RE (1987b) Modeling the sustainable harvest of polar bears. J Wildl Manag 51:811–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor MK, Laake J, Cluff HD, Ramsay M, Messier F (2002) Managing the risk from hunting for the viscount Melville sound polar bear population (International Association for Bear Research and Management). Ursus 13:185–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Urquhart DR, Schweinsburg RE (1984) Polar bear: life history and known distribution of polar bear in the northwest Territories up to 1981. Department of Renewable Resources, Yellowknife, Northwest Territories

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. US Geological Survey, Anchorage, 99508, AK, USA

    Elizabeth Peacock

Authors
  1. Elizabeth Peacock
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth Peacock .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Clinical Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford, Bristol, United Kingdom

    Andy Butterworth

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG (outside the USA)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Peacock, E. (2017). The Harvest of Polar Bears Across the Circumpolar North. In: Butterworth, A. (eds) Marine Mammal Welfare. Animal Welfare, vol 17. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46994-2_26

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation