Skip to main content

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Ethics ((BRIEFSETHIC))

Abstract

This chapter outlines the elements of integrity system for police organisations. The elements in question included oversight bodies, internal affairs corruption investigations, professional reporting and integrity testing. I argue that the key moral notion informing integrity systems is that of collective moral responsibility and I provide an analysis of that notion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Earlier versions of the material in this and the following section appeared in Miller (2010a, 2014).

  2. 2.

    Note that from the fact that a principle is objectively correct it does not follow that it ought to be universally followed. See Chap. 1.

  3. 3.

    There is a dispute as to whether policing ought to be regarded as a profession or a craft. I suggest that police are an emerging profession. At any rate at the very least they should be regarded as a quasi-profession to distinguish them from occupations that require little or no specialized training and knowledge. However, these controversies make no difference to the points I am making here since elsewhere I have defined policing according to this teleological conception and this conception does not depend on police being accorded the status of a profession.

  4. 4.

    Nevertheless, and consistent with this claim, a police officer’s sexual activities, even if they do not involve other police, may become professionally problematic in so far as they bring the police service into disrepute.

References

  • Alexandra, Andrew, and Seumas Miller. 2010. Integrity systems for occupations. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giuliani, R.W., and Bratton, W.J. 1995. Police strategy No.7: Rooting out corruption; Building organizational integrity in the New York Police Department. New York: New York Police Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivkovic, Sanja Kutnjak, and M.R. Haberfeld (eds.). 2015. Measuring police integrity across the world: Studies from established democracies and countries in transition. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klockars, Carl. 2015. The contours of police integrity. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Seumas. 1992. Joint action. Philosophical Papers 21(3): 275–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Seumas. 1995. Intentions, ends and joint action. Philosophical Papers 24(1): 51–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Seumas. 2001. Social action: A teleological account. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Seumas. 2004. Noble cause corruption in policing revisited. In A safe, just and tolerant society: Police virtue rediscovered, ed. P. Villiers, and R. Adlam, 105–118. Winchester: Waterside Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Seumas. 2006. Collective moral responsibility: An individualist account. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 30: 176–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Seumas. 2010a. Integrity systems and professional reporting in police organisations. Criminal Justice Ethics 29(3): 241–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Seumas. 2010b. Moral foundations of social institutions: A philosophical study. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Seumas. 2014. Human rights, police corruption and anti-corruption systems for police organisations. Australian Journal of Human Rights 20(2): 165–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Seumas, and John Blackler. 2005. Ethical issues in policing. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Seumas, Peter Roberts, and Edward Spence. 2005. Corruption and anti-corruption: A study in applied philosophy. Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Seumas, Steve Curry, Ian Gordon, John Blackler and Tim Prenzler. 2008. An integrity system for victoria police: Volume 2, Australian research council linkage grant funded report for Victoria Police. Canberra: Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prenzler, Tim. 2009. Police corruption: Preventing misconduct and maintaining integrity. London: CRC Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Prenzler, Tim, Seumas Miller, Steve Curry, Ian Gordon, John Blackler. 2008. An integrity system for victoria police: Volume 1, Australian research council linkage grant funded report for Victoria Police. Canberra: Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Dennis F. 1987. The moral responsibility of many hands. In Political ethics and public office. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seumas Miller .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Miller, S. (2016). Integrity Systems for Police Organisations. In: Corruption and Anti-Corruption in Policing—Philosophical and Ethical Issues. SpringerBriefs in Ethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46991-1_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics