Advertisement

Enlightened International Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Social Irresponsibility, and Human Rights

  • Aloys PrinzEmail author
Chapter
  • 601 Downloads
Part of the Ethical Economy book series (SEEP, volume 51)

Abstract

The size and power of multinational enterprises (MNEs) raise serious issues concerning their social responsibility. In particular, demands that they employ their economic power to enforce pro-actively human rights in less developed countries (LDCs), is high on the business ethics agenda. This chapter focuses on the conditions under which MNEs can contribute voluntarily to enforcing human rights. First, it is shown that corporate social irresponsibility (CSI) is a legal concern for MNEs in their home countries, because national policy and enterprise policy may be complements for good, but also for bad. Avoiding legal problems in the home country is then a priority for all MNEs. Second, in contrast to CSI, international corporate social responsibility (ICSR), over and above the human rights minimum, requires voluntariness, since national policy and company policy are substitutes in this respect. Moreover, voluntary ICSR policies will be applied according to the willingness of employees, customers and investors to pay the price.

Keywords

Corporate social irresponsibility International corporate social responsibility Multinational enterprises Human rights Voluntariness 

JEL-Classification

M14 L21 K33 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I’d like to thank Brian Bloch very much for extensive text editing.

References

  1. Aaronson, Susan Ariel, and Ian Higham. 2013. “Re-righting business”: John Ruggie and the struggle to develop international human rights standards for transnational firms. Human Rights Quarterly 36: 333–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aixalá, José, and Gema Fabro. 2009. Economic freedom, civil liberties, political rights and growth: A causality analysis. Spanish Economic Review 11: 165–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Albin-Lackey, Chris. 2013. Without rules: A failed approach to corporate accountability. In Human Rights Watch world report 2013, 29–40. Human Rights Watch.Google Scholar
  4. Andersen, Erik André, and Birgit Lindsnæs. 2007. Public goods. In Towards new global strategies. Public goods and human rights, ed. Erik André Andersen and Birgit Lindsnæs, 29–52. Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  5. Anderson, Sarah, and John Cavanagh. 2000. Top 200. The rise of corporate global power. Washington, DC: Institute for Policy Studies.Google Scholar
  6. Armstrong, J. Scott. 1977. Social irresponsibility in management. Journal of Business Research 5: 185–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Armstrong, J. Scott, and Kesten C. Green. 2013. Effects of corporate social responsibility and irresponsibility policies. Journal of Business Research 66: 1922–1927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Backer, Larry Catá. 2011. The evolution of the United Nations’ “Respect-Protect-Remedy” project: The state, the corporation and human rights in a global governance context. Santa Clara Journal of International Law 9: 37–80.Google Scholar
  9. Barrett, Scott. 2007. Why cooperate? The incentive to supply global public goods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barry, Norman. 2008. Rule of law. In The encyclopedia of libertarianism, ed. Ronald Hamowy, 445–447. Thousand Oaks, et al.: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Baumeister, R.F., E. Bratslavsky, C. Finkenauer, and K.D. Vohs. 2001. Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology 5: 323–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Becchetti, Leonardo. 2012. Voting with the wallet. International Review of Economics 59(3): 245–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Besley, Timothy, and Maitreesh Ghatak. 2007. Retailing public goods: The economics of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Public Economics 91: 1645–1663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bretschger, Roman. 2010. Unternehmen und Menschenrechte. Elemente und Potenzial eines informellen Menschenrechtsschutzes. Dissertation of Universität Zürich. Zürich: Schulthess Juristische Medien.Google Scholar
  15. Buchholz, Rogene A. 1991. Corporate social responsibility and the good society: From economics to ecology. Business Horizons 34(4): 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Buntenbroich, David. 2007. Menschenrechte und Unternehmen. Transnationale Rechtswirkungen „freiwilliger“ Verhaltenskodizes. Dissertation of Universität zu Köln, 2005. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  17. Carroll, Archie B. 1991. The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons 34(4): 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Carroll, Archie B., and Kareem M. Shabana. 2010. The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews 12: 85–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Černič, Jernej Letnar. 2008. Corporate responsibility for human rights: A critical analysis of the OECD guidelines for multinational enterprises. Hanse Law Review 3(1): 71–101.Google Scholar
  20. Černič, Jernej Letnar. 2009. Corporate responsibility for human rights: Analyzing the ILO tripartite declaration of principles concerning multinational enterprises and social policy. Miskolc Journal of International Law 6(1): 24–34.Google Scholar
  21. Chan, Anita, and Robert J. Ross. 2003. Racing to the bottom: International trade without a social clause. Third World Quarterly 24(6): 1011–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chodak, Grzegorz, and Krzysztof Kowal. 2011. Degree of economic freedom and relationship to economic growth and human development, MPRA Paper No. 36712. Wrocław University of Technology, Poland.Google Scholar
  23. Clapham, A., and S. Jerby. 2001. Categories of corporate complicity in human rights abuses. International and Comparative Law Journal 24: 339–349.Google Scholar
  24. Commission of the European Communities. 2002. Corporate social responsibility – Main issues. Memo/02/153, Brussels.Google Scholar
  25. Comte-Sponville, André. 2009. Kann Kapitalismus moralisch sein? Zürich: Diogenes.Google Scholar
  26. Dahlsrud, Alexander. 2008. How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 15: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Damania, Richard, Per G. Frederiksson, and John A. List. 2003. Trade liberalization, corruption, and environmental policy formation: Theory and evidence. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 46(3): 490–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Davies, Ronald B., and Krishna Chaitanya Vadlamannati. 2013. A race to the bottom in labor standards? An empirical investigation. Journal of Development Economics 103: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. De Grauwe, Paul, and Filip Camerman. 2002. How big are the big multinational companies? Working Paper, University of Leuven and Belgian Senate.Google Scholar
  30. De Soysa, Indra, and Krishna Chaitanya Vadlammanati. 2013. Do pro-market economic reforms drive human rights violations? An empirical assessment, 1981–2006. Public Choice 155: 163–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dunn, Craig P. 1991. Are corporations inherently wicked? Business Horizons 34(4): 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Elkington, John. 1998. Cannibals with forks. The triple bottom line of twenty-first century business. Oxford: Capstone.Google Scholar
  33. Eriksen, Silja, and Indra De Soysa. 2009. A fate worse than debt? International financial institutions and human rights, 1981–2003. Journal of Peace Research 46(4): 485–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ermacora, Felix. 1982. Internationale Dokumente zum Menschenrechtsschutz. Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar
  35. Faria, Hugo J., and Hugo M. Montesinos. 2009. Does economic freedom cause prosperity? An IV approach. Public Choice 141: 103–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Farzin, Y. Hossein, and Craig A. Bond. 2006. Democracy and environmental quality. Journal of Development Economics 81(1): 213–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Frankel, Jeffrey A. 2003. The environment and globalization, NBER working paper No. 10090. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Freeman, R. Edward, and Jeanne Liedtka. 1991. Corporate social responsibility: A critical approach. Business Horizons 34(4): 92–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Grappi, Silvia, Simona Romani, and Richard P. Bagozzi. 2013. Consumer response to corporate social irresponsible behavior: Moral emotions and virtues. Journal of Business Research 66: 1814–1821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gwartney, James, and Robert Lawson. 2004. Ten consequences of economic freedom. National Center for Policy Analysis (NCPA), NCPA Policy Report No. 268.Google Scholar
  41. Hertz, Noreena. 2001. The silent takeover. Global capitalism and the death of democracy. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  42. Hindriks, Jean, and Gareth D. Myles. 2006. Intermediate public economics. Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  43. Hirshleifer, Jack. 1983. From weakest link to best shot: The voluntary provision of public goods. Public Choice 41: 371–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Johansen, Henrik Brade, Helle Bank Jørgensen, and Jens Kvorning. 2007. The global responsibility of private companies. In Towards new global strategies. Public goods and human rights, ed. Erik André Andersen and Birgit Lindsnæs, 433–450. Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  45. Joseph, Sarah. 1999. Taming the leviathans: Multinational enterprises and human rights. Netherlands International Law Review 46: 171–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kaul, Inge, Isabelle Grunberg, and Marc A. Stern (eds.). 1999. Global public goods. New York/Oxford: UNDP/Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Kettner, Matthias. 1999. Menschenrechte und Interkulturalität. Ein Beitrag zur diskursiven Konzeption der Menschenrechte. In Philosophie der Menschenrechte, ed. Thomas Göller, 52–87. Göttingen: Cuvillier.Google Scholar
  48. Kinley, David, Justine Nolan, and Natalie Zerial. 2007. The politics of corporate social responsibility: Reflections on the United Nations human rights norms for corporations. Company and Securities Law Journal 25(1): 30–42.Google Scholar
  49. Knox, John H. 2008. Horizontal human rights law. The American Journal of International Law 102(1): 1–47.Google Scholar
  50. Koeltz, Kristina. 2010. Menschenrechtsverantwortung multinationaler Unternehmen. Eine Untersuchung „weicher“ Steuerungsinstrumente im Spannungsfeld Wirtschaft und Menschenrechte. Berlin: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Berlin.Google Scholar
  51. Kotchen, Matthew, and Jon J Moon. 2012. Corporate social responsibility for irresponsibility. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy, 12(Iss. 1, Contributions), Article 55.Google Scholar
  52. Lawson, Robert A., and J.R. Clark. 2010. Examining the Hayek-Friedman hypothesis on economic and political freedom. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 74: 230–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lawton, Thomas, Steven McGuire, and Tazeeb Rajwani. 2013. Corporate political activity: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews 15: 86–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lin-Hi, Nick, and Karsten Müller. 2013. The CSR bottom line: Preventing social irresponsibility. Journal of Business Research 66: 1928–1936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. List, John A., W. Warren McHone, and Daniel L. Millimet. 2004. Effects of environmental regulation on foreign and domestic plant births: Is there a home field advantage? Journal of Urban Economics 56(2): 303–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lukas, Karin. 2007. Konzernverhalten menschenrechtlich hinterfragt. In Popper und die Menschenrechte, ed. Erwin Riefler, 67–80. Frankfurt a.M., et al.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  57. Macdonald, Kate. 2011. Re-thinking ‚Spheres of Resposibility’: Business responsibility for indirect harm. Journal of Business Ethics 99: 549–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mahon, John F., and Richard A. McGowan. 1991. Searching for the common good: A process-oriented approach. Business Horizons 34(4): 79–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Meyer, William H. 1996. Human rights and MNCs: Theory versus quantitative analysis. Human Rights Quarterly 18(2): 368–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Minor, D., and J. Morgan. 2011. CSR as reputation insurance: Primum non nocere. California Management Review 53: 40–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Muchlinski, Peter T. 2001. Human rights and multinationals: Is there a problem? International Affairs 77(1): 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Murphy, Matthew, and Jordi Vives. 2013. Perceptions of justice and the human rights ‘Respect, Protect, and Remedy’ framework. Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-1821-0.Google Scholar
  63. Najam, Adil, David Runnalls, and Mark Halle. 2007. Environment and globalization. Five propositions. Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development.Google Scholar
  64. Öberseder, Magdalena, Bodo B. Schlegelmilch, and Verena Gruber. 2011. “Why don’t consumers care about CSR?”: A qualitative study exploring the role of CSR in consumption decisions. Journal of Business Ethics 104(4): 449–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. OECD. 2002. Multinational enterprises in situations of violent conflict and widespread human rights abuses, OECD working papers on international investment, 2002/01. Paris: OECD Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. OECD. 2006. OECD risk awareness tool for multinational enterprises in weak governance zones. Paris: OECD Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. OECD. 2011. OECD guidelines for multinational enterprises, 2011 ed. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  68. Peltzman, Sam. 1976. Toward a more general theory of regulation. Journal of Law and Economics 19(2): 211–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Priddat, Birger P. 1998. Moralischer Konsum. 13 Lektionen über die Käuflichkeit. Stuttgart/Leipzig: S. Hirzel Verlag.Google Scholar
  70. Priddat, Birger P. 2000. Moral hybrids: Skizze zu einer Theorie moralischen Konsums. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik 1: 128–151.Google Scholar
  71. Ratner, Steven R. 2001. Corporations and human rights: A theory of legal responsibility. The Yale Law Journal 111(3): 443–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Rosling, Hans. 2011. TED lecture: New insights on poverty. http://www.ted.com/talks/hans_rosling_reveals_new_insights_on_poverty.html. Accessed 4 Sept 2013.
  73. Rowland, C.K., and R. Marz. 1982. Gresham’s law: The regulatory analogy. Policy Studies Review 1: 572–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Ruggie, John. 2008. Protect, respect and remedy: A framework for business and human rights. Innovations 3(2): 189–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Selya, Roger Mark. 2012. A geography of human rights abuses. Human Rights Quarterly 34(4): 1045–1083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Singh, Ajit, and Ann Zammit. 2004. Labour standards and the ‘race to the bottom’: Rethinking globalization and workers’ rights from developmental and solidaristic perspectives. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 20(1): 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Stehr, Nico. 2007. Die Moralisierung der Märkte. Suhrkamp: Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
  78. Stern, David I. 2004. The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Development 32(8): 1419–1439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Stopford, John, and Susan Strange, (with Henley, John S.). 1991. Rival states, rival firms – Competition for world market shares. Cambridge, et al.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  80. Sweetin, Vernon H., Lynette L. Knowles, John H. Summey, and Kand S. McQueen. 2013. Willingness-to-punish the corporate brand for corporate social irresponsibility. Journal of Business Research 66: 1822–1830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Teubner, Gunther. 2006. The anonymous matrix: Human rights violations by ‘private’ transnational actors. The Modern Law Review 69(3): 327–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. The Economist. 2005a. Profit and the public good. Special report: Corporate social responsibility, January 20th. Internet URL: http://www.economist.com/node/3555259/print. Accessed 16 Sept 2013.
  83. The Economist. 2005b. The union of concerned executives. Special report: Corporate social responsibility, January 20th. Internet URL: http://www.economist.com/node/3555259/print. Accessed 16 Sept 2013.
  84. Torugsa, Nuttaneeya Ann, Wayne O’Donohue, and Rob Hecker. 2013. Proactive CSR: An empirical analysis of the role of its economic, social and environmental dimensions on the association between capabilities and performance. Journal of Business Ethics 115: 383–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Van Marrewijk, M. 2001. The concept and definition of corporate social responsibility. Amsterdam: Triple P Performance Center.Google Scholar
  86. Voiculescu, Aurora. 2009. Human rights and the new corporate accountability: Learning from new developments in corporate criminal liability. Journal of Business Ethics 87(Supplement 2): 419–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Weissbrodt, David. 2005. Business and human rights. University of Cincinnati Law Review 74: 55–73.Google Scholar
  88. Weissbrodt, David, and Muria Kruger. 2003. Norms on the responsibilities of transnational corporations and other business enterprises with regard to human rights. The American Journal of International Law 97(4): 901–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Weschka, Marion. 2006. Human rights and multinational enterprises: How can multinational enterprises held responsible for human rights violations committed abroad? Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 66: 625–661.Google Scholar
  90. Wettstein, Florian. 2010. The duty to protect: Corporate complicity, political responsibility, and human rights advocacy. Journal of Business Ethics 96: 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Windsor, Duane. 2013. Corporate social responsibility and irresponsibility: A positive theory approach. Journal of Business Research 66: 1937–1944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Woods, Neal D. 2006. Interstate competition and environmental regulation: A test of the race-to-the-bottom thesis. Social Science Quarterly 87(1): 174–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Wouters, Jan, Eva Brems, Stefaan Smis, and Pierre Schmitt (eds.). 2010. Accountability for human rights violations by international organisations. Antwerp/Oxford/Portland: Intersentia.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Public Economics and Center for Economic TheoryUniversity of MuensterMuensterGermany

Personalised recommendations