Skip to main content

Concepts of the International Manufacturing Remote Lab (MINTReLab) – Combination of a MOOC and a Remote Lab for a Manufacturing Technology Online Course

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Engineering Education 4.0

Abstract

A concept for a Manufacturing Technology Online Course, which combines the MOOC approach and the use of a remote laboratory is presented. Hence, this online course is a combination of a MOOC-concept and a physically existing but tele-operatively usable experimentation laboratory for real engineering experimentation. Developing this online course can be either used as an advertising for mechanical engineering education in Germany and for the “Master of Science in Manufacturing Technology (MMT)” or as one part of the preparation process for international students coming to Dortmund in advance of their stay in Germany. For doing so the course offers not only core engineering content around the topic of manufacturing technology but also explains the German educational system at higher education institutions and presents cultural information about Germany as a place to live.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. D. May and A. E. Tekkaya, “The globally competent engineer: What different stakeholders say about educating engineers for a globalized world,” in Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL), 2014 International Conference on, 2014, pp. 924–930.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. d’Oliveira, S. Carson, K. James, and J. Lazarus, “MIT OpenCourseWare: Unlocking Knowledge, Empowering Minds,” Science, vol. 329, pp. 525–526, 2010-07-30 00:00:00 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. Pappano, “The Year of the MOOC,” in The New York Times, ed, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Chadaj, C. Allison, and G. Baxter, “MOOCS with attitudes: Insights from a practitioner based investigation,” in Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2014 IEEE, 2014, pp. 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Reich, “Rebooting MOOC Research,” Science, vol. 347, pp. 34–35, 2015-01-02 00:00:00 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Bakki, L. Oubahssi, C. Cherkaoui, and S. George, “Motivation and Engagement in MOOCS: How to Increase Learning Motivation by Adapting Pedagogical Scenarios?,” in Design for Teaching and Learning in a Networked World: 10th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, EC-TEL 2015, Toledo, Spain, September 15-18, 2015, Proceedings, G. Conole, T. Klobucar, C. Rensing, J. Konert, and É. Lavoué, Eds., ed Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015, pp. 556–559.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. J. Williams, “Applying cognitive science to online learning,” Available at SSRN, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Romero and M. Usart, “Serious Games Integration in an Entrepreneurship Massive Online Open Course (MOOC),” in Serious Games Development and Applications: 4th International Conference, SGDA 2013, Trondheim, Norway, September 25-27, 2013. Proceedings, M. Ma, M. F. Oliveira, S. Petersen, J. B. Hauge, Eds., ed Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013, pp. 212–225.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. E. Corter, J. V. Nickerson, S. K. Esche and C. Chassapis, “Remote versus hands-on labs: a comparative study,” in Frontiers in Education, 2014. FIE 2004. 34th Annua, 2004, pp. F1G-17-21, Vol. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Ma and J. V. Nickerson, “Hands-on, simulated, and remote laboratories: A comparative literature review,” ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), vol. 38, p. 7, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  11. N. E. Cagiltay, E. Aydin, C. C. Aydin, A. Kara, and M. Alexandru, “Seven principles of instructional content design for a remote laboratory: a case study on errl,” Education, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 54, pp. 320–327, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  12. E. Sancristobal, S. Martin, R. Gil, P. Orduna, M. Tawfik, A. Pesquera, et al., “State of art, initiatives and new challenges for Virtual and Remote Labs,” in Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on, 2012, pp. 714–715.

    Google Scholar 

  13. V. Chennam Vijay, M. Lees, P. Chima, C. Chapman, and P. Raju, “Knowledge based educational framework for enhancing practical skills in engineering distance learners,” in Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 2015 IEEE, 2015, pp. 124–131

    Google Scholar 

  14. G. Diaz, F. Garcia Loro, M. Castro, M. Tawfik, E. Sancristobal, and S. Monteso, “Remote electronics lab within a MOOC: Design and preliminary results,” in Experiment@ International Conference (exp. at’13), 2013 2nd, 2013, pp. 89–93.

    Google Scholar 

  15. D. May, A. Sadiki, C. Pleul and A. E. Tekkaya, “Teaching, and learning globally connected using live online classes for preparing international engineering students for transnational collaboration and for studying in germany,” in Proceedings of 2015 12th International Conference on Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation, REV 2015, 2015, pp. 118–126.

    Google Scholar 

  16. D. May, T. R. Ortelt, A. E. Tekkaya, “Using remote laboratories for transnational online learning environments in engineering education,” in E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, 2015, pp. 632–637.

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. E. Tekkaya, J. M. Allwood, P. F. Bariani, S. Bruschi, J. Cao, S. Gramlich, et al., “Metal forming beyond shaping: Predicting and setting product properties,” CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, vol. 64, pp. 629–653, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  18. T. R. Ortelt, A. Sadiki, C. Pleul, C. Becker, S. Chatti, A. E. Tekkaya, “Development of a tele-operative testing cell as a remote lab for material characterization,” in Proceedings of 2014 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning, ICL 2014, 2015, pp. 977–982.

    Google Scholar 

  19. C. Terkowsky, I. Jahnke, C. Pleul, R. Licari, P. Johansson, G. Buffa, et al., “Developing tele-operated laboratories for manufacturing engineering education,” Platform for E-Learning and Telemetric Experimentation (PeTEX) International Journal of Online Engineering (iJOE) Vol, vol. 6, pp. 60–70, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. Sadiki, T. R. Ortelt, C. Pleul, C. Becker, S. Chatti, A. E. Tekkaya, “The challenge of specimen handling in remote laboratories for engineering education,” in Proceedings of 2015 12th International Conference on Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation, REV 2015, 2015, pp. 180–185.

    Google Scholar 

  21. V. J. Harward, J. A. Del Alamo, S. R. Lerman, P. H. Bailey, J. Carpenter, K. DeLong, et al., “The ilab shared architecture: A web services infrastructure to build communities of internet accessible laboratories,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 96, pp. 931–950, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tobias R. Ortelt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ortelt, T.R., Pekasch, S., Lensing, K., Guéno, PJ., May, D., Tekkaya, A.E. (2016). Concepts of the International Manufacturing Remote Lab (MINTReLab) – Combination of a MOOC and a Remote Lab for a Manufacturing Technology Online Course. In: Frerich, S., et al. Engineering Education 4.0. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46916-4_41

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics