Skip to main content

Massive Open Online Courses in Engineering Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Engineering Education 4.0

Abstract

Though higher engineering education generally lacks students in Germany, some universities are faced with the challenge of dealing with extremely high enrollment numbers due to recent changes in education policy. In the winter term 2011/2012 approx. 1,900 students enrolled for mechanical engineering and industrial engineering and management at RWTH (Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule) Aachen University putting the educational skills of teachers to the test. Obviously, new concepts become necessary to find adequate teaching models. Modern information and communication technologies have already become a constant part of everyday life among the new generation of students. But their full potential for higher education has not yet been exploited. Concepts hitherto focused on integrating technologies such as Audience-Response-Systems or mobile applications into face-to-face lectures. Only recently a new approach emerged, bearing the potential of teaching increasingly high numbers of students entirely online and of revolutionizing the higher education landscape: Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). They seem to highly motivate their students to actively participate in online courses and to interact with teachers and fellow students using social and technical networks. As demonstrated by initiatives such as the Khan Academy, udacity, edX, or Coursera MOOCs attract enormous numbers of students (In 2011 160,000 students followed the Stanford lecture on Artificial Intelligence by Prof. Thrun and Prof. Norvig with 23,000 earning a certificate). This paper aims to show how MOOCs might help to tackle the challenges of teaching large classes in higher engineering education. As they have attracted large amounts of students especially for engineering topics, they might be adequate for higher engineering education. A variety of MOOCs have emerged so far based on fundamentally different learning principles that cater to the needs of engineering education in different ways. Thus, this paper categorizes MOOCs according to their underlying didactical approaches in a first step. In a second step it is evaluated to what extend the different kinds of MOOCs can be used to implement active and problem-based learning in a large class and for what purposes in engineering education they can be best applied. The results are useful for any university teacher in higher engineering education dealing with large classes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The number of schooling years for the Abitur (German higher education entrance certificate) was reduced from 13 to 12 years. The compulsory military service was suspended as from July 1st, 2011 along with the corresponding civil service. This led to increasing numbers of students heading for universities directly after finishing secondary education and in the future even more students are expected to enter German higher education [1].

  2. 2.

    Further information on the team can be found at: http://www.ima-zlw-ifu.rwth-aachen.de/institutscluster/mitarbeiter/einzelansicht/team/Sabina-Jeschke.html (last accessed October 1, 2012).

  3. 3.

    More information on http://www.teaching-learning.eu (last accessed September 24, 2012).

  4. 4.

    More information on http://www.elli-online.net (last accessed September 24, 2012).

  5. 5.

    Audience Response Systems (ARS) were developed for large classes to integrate interactive exchange between the teacher and a large number of students. Questions are answered by students either via smartphone, SMS, or an ARS device [6].

  6. 6.

    It has largely been discussed throughout the scientific community as to whether connectivism really states a new learning theory. A brief summary of the criticism of connectivism is provided by Siemens [19].

  7. 7.

    In 2007 Wiley first offered the wiki-based course “Open Ed Syllabus”. The course material can be accessed at http://opencontent.org/wiki/index.php?title=Intro_Open_Ed_Syllabus (last accessed September 25, 2012).

  8. 8.

    Personal Learning Environments, Networks and Knowledge 2010 (PLENK2010) http://connect.downes.ca.

  9. 9.

    eduMOOC: Online Learning Today...and Tomorrow http://edumooc.wikispaces.com (last accessed September 22, 2012).

  10. 10.

    Learning and training with mobile devices http://mobimooc.wikispaces.com (last accessed September 22, 2012).

  11. 11.

    Digital Storytelling (DS) http://ds106.us (last accessed September 22, 2012)

  12. 12.

    Learning and Knowledge Analytics (LAK) http://www.learninganalytics.net (last accessed September 22, 2012).

  13. 13.

    http://www.khanacademy.org (last accessed September 22, 2012).

  14. 14.

    https://www.ai-class.com (last accessed October 1, 2012).

  15. 15.

    http://mitx.mit.edu (last accessed October 1, 2012).

  16. 16.

    https://www.edx.org (last accessed September 22, 2012)

  17. 17.

    https://www.coursera.org (last accessed September 22, 2012).

  18. 18.

    http://www.udacity.com (last accessed September 22, 2012).

  19. 19.

    German MOOC initiatives: #ocwl11 – Open Course Workplace Learning 2011 http://ocwl11.wissensdialoge.de, OPCO11 http://blog.studiumdigitale.uni-frankfurt.de/opco11, OPCO12 http://opco12.de, iversity http://www.iversity.org, openHPI https://openhpi.de (last accessed September 12, 2012).

  20. 20.

    The course can be found at http://open.mooc.ca (last accessed September 26, 2012).

  21. 21.

    The course can be retrieved from http://cck11.mooc.ca (last accessed September 26, 2012).

  22. 22.

    Both courses can be retrieved from http://www.udacity.com/courses (last accessed September 26, 2012).

  23. 23.

    First developed by the Mozilla Foundation, badges are used on the Internet as a “validated indicator of accomplishment, skill, quality or interest” [30]. They can be provided to testify the accomplishment of formal as well as informal knowledge.

  24. 24.

    Tumblr is a mirco-blogging platform https://www.tumblr.com (last accessed October 3, 2012).

  25. 25.

    Diigo is an online bookmarking tool http://www.diigo.com (last accessed October 3, 2012).

  26. 26.

    Meet-ups are organized through a separate platform http://www.meetup.com/Udacity/ (last accessed September 19, 2012).

References

  1. K. KMK. Positiver trend zum studium hält an – kultusministerkonferenz veröffentlicht vorausberechnung, 2012. URL http://www.kmk.org/presse- und-aktuelles/meldung/positiver-trend-zum-studium-haelt-an-kultusministerkonferenz-veroeffentlicht-vorausberechnung.html

  2. U. Heublein, C. Hutzsch, J. Schreiber, D. Sommer, G. Besuch, Ursachen des Studienabbruchs in Bachelor- und in herkömmlichen Studiengängen. Ergebnisse einer bundesweiten Befragung von Exmatrikulierten des Studienjahres 2007/08. Hochschul-Informations-System GmbH, Hannover, 2009. URL http://www.bildungsserver.de/db/mlesen.html?Id=44422

  3. H.D. Hötte, H. Fritz, RWTH aachen university. zahlenspiegel 2011. Tech. rep., RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Jeschke, VisioneerING. future trends in engineering education. In: Proceedings of IGIP International Conference on Engineering Pedagogy, Villach, Septermber 26–28, 2012. 2012

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. Jeschke, M. Petermann, A.E. Tekkaya, Ingenieurwissenschaftliche ausbildung - ein streifzug durch herausforderungen, methoden und modellprojekte. In: TeachING-LearnING.EU Fachtagung “Next Generation Engineering Education”, ed. by U. Bach, S. Jeschke, ZLW/IMA der RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, 2011, pp. 11–22

    Google Scholar 

  6. V. Stehling, U. Bach, A. Richert, S. Jeschke, Teaching professional knowledge to XL- classes with the help of digital technologies. In: ProPEL Conference Proceedings 2012. 2012

    Google Scholar 

  7. Teaching large classes well. new directions for teaching and learning. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  8. Schreyer Institute for Teaching Excellence. Teaching large classes - schreyer institute for teaching excellence, 1992. URL http://www.schreyerinstitute.psu.edu/Tools/Large/

  9. B. Gross Davis, Tools for Teaching. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  10. S.M. Ives. A survival handbook for teaching large classes, 2000. URL http://www.teaching.uncc.edu/articles-books/best-practice-articles/large-classes/handbook-large-classes#part1

  11. D. Spiller. Maximising learning in large groups: The lecture context, 2011. URL http://www.waikato.ac.nz/tdu/pdf/booklets/3_LargeGroups.pdf

  12. P. Arnold, L. Kilian, A. Thillosen, G. Zimmer, Handbuch E-Learning. Lehren und Lernen mit digitalen Medien, 2nd edn. Bertelsmann, Bielefeld, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  13. F. Klocke, M. Pasthor, Challenge and absolute necessity. In: TeachING-LearnING.EU Fachtagung “Next Generation Engineering Education”, ed. by U. Bach, S. Jeschke, ZLW/IMA der RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, 2011, pp. 23–37

    Google Scholar 

  14. R.B. Barr, J. Tagg, From teaching to learning - a new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change 27(6), 1995, pp. 697–710

    Google Scholar 

  15. L. Deslauriers, E. Schelew, C. Wieman, Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class. Science 332, 2011, pp. 862–864

    Google Scholar 

  16. J.D. Karpicke, J.R. Blunt, Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping. Science 331(6018), 2011, pp. 772–775

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Svinivki, W.J. McKeachie, McKeachie’s Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research and Theory for College and University Teachers, 13th edn. Wadsworth, Belmont, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  18. O. Rodriguez, MOOCs and the AI-Stanford like courses: Two successful and distinct course formats for massive open online courses. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 2012. [Online]. Available: URL http://www.eurodl.org/?article=516. [Accessed: 03.10.2012].

  19. G. Siemens. Criticism of connectivism, 2006. URL http://www.connectivism.ca/?p=75

  20. G. Siemens. Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age, 2005. URL http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jan_05/article01.htm

  21. R. McGreal, G. Siemens. Openness in education, 2012. URL http://open.mooc.ca

  22. G. Siemens. Designing, developing, and running (massive) open online courses, 2012. URL http://www.slideshare.net/gsiemens

  23. A. Fini, The technological dimension of a massive open online course: The case of the CCK08 course tools. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 10(5), 2009

    Google Scholar 

  24. M. Fries. Bildungsprojekt udacity: Hochschulbildung, kostenlos und für alle, 2012. URL http://www.zeit.de/studium/uni-leben/2012-01/udacity-thrun

  25. B.B.F. Faviero, Major players in online education market. comparing khan academy, coursera, udacity, & edX missions, offerings. The Tech 132(34), 2012

    Google Scholar 

  26. B.S. Bloom, The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher 13(6), 1984, pp. 4–16

    Google Scholar 

  27. D. Boud, R. Cohen, J. Sampson, Peer learning and assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 24 (4), 1999, pp. 413–426

    Google Scholar 

  28. E. Mazur, Peer Instruction: A User’s Manual. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  29. P. Ramsden, Learning to Teach in Higher Education, 2nd edn. RoutledgeFalmer, London, New York, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  30. K. Carey. A future full of badges, 2012. URL http://chronicle.com/article/A-Future-Full-of-Badges/131455/

  31. D. Koller. What we’re learning from online education, 2012. URL http://www.ted.com/talks/daphne_koller_what_we_re_learning_from_online_education.html

  32. J. Moskaliuk. Bildung zwischen hochschule und web, 2012. URL http://www.wissenmaldrei.de/bildung-zwischen-hochschule-und-web/

  33. S. Writers. The world of massive open online courses, 2012. URL http://www.onlinecolleges.net/2012/07/11/the-world-of-massive-open-online-courses/

  34. L. Johnson, S. Adams, M. Cummins, The NMC Horizon Report: 2012 Higher Education Edition. The New Media Consortium, Austin, Texas, 2012

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ute Heckel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Heckel, U., Bach, U., Richert, A., Jeschke, S. (2016). Massive Open Online Courses in Engineering Education. In: Frerich, S., et al. Engineering Education 4.0. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46916-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics