Abstract
Within highly automated assembly systems, the planning effort forms a large part of production costs. Due to shortening product lifecycles, changing customer demands and therefore an increasing number of ramp-up processes these costs even rise. So assembly systems should reduce these efforts and simultaneously be flexible for quick adaption to changes in products and their variants. A cognitive interaction system in the field of assembly planning systems is developed within the Cluster of Excellence “Integrative production technology for high-wage countries” at RWTH Aachen University which integrates several cognitive capabilities according to human cognition. This approach combines the advantages of automation with the flexibility of humans. In this paper the main principles of the system’s core component – the cognitive control unit – are presented to underline its advantages with respect to traditional assembly systems. Based on this, the actual innovation of this paper is the development of key performance indicators.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
C. Brecher, F. Klocke, R. Schmitt, G. Schuh, Excellence in Production. Apprimus Verlag, Aachen, 2007
M. Mayer, C. Schlick, D. Ewert, D. Behnen, S. Kuz, B. Odenthal, B. Kausch, Automation of robotic assembly processes on the basis of an architecture of human cognition. Production Engineering Research and Development 5 (4), pp. 423–431
A. Pufall, J.C. Fransoo, A.d. Kok, What determines product ramp-up performance? A review of characteristics based on a case study at Nokia mobile phones, BETA publicaties. Preprints, vol. WP 228. [Beta, Research School for Operations Management and Logistics], Eindhoven, 2007
H. Winkler, M. Heins, P. Nyhuis, A controlling system based on cause-effect relationships for the ramp-up of production systems. Production Engineering Research and Development 1 (1), 2007, pp. 103–111
E. Hauck, A. Gramatke, K. Henning, A software architecture for cognitive technical systems suitable for an assembly task in a production environment: Automation control - theory and practice. In: Two Stage Approaches for Modeling Pollutant Emission of Diesel Engine Based on Kriging Model, ed. by El Hassane Brahmi, Ghislaine Joly-Blanchard, Lilianne Denis-Vidal, Nassim Boudaoud, Zohra Cherfi, INTECH Open Access Publisher, 2009, pp. 13–28
J. Hoffmann, Ff: the fast-forward planning system. The AI Magazine (22), 2001
C. Castellini, E. Giunchiglia, A. Tacchella, O. Tacchella, Improvements to satbased conformant planning. In: Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Planning (ECP-01), ed. by A. Cesta, D. Borrajo. AAAI Press, Palo Alto, California, 2001
J. Hoffmann, R. Brafman, Contingent planning via heuristic forward search with implicit belief states. In: Proceedings of ICAPS’05. 2005, pp. 71–80
S.G. Kaufman, R.H. Wilson, R. Calton, A.L. Ames, Automated planning and programming of assembly of fully 3d mechanisms, Technical Report, vol. SAND96-0433. Sandia National Laboratories, 1996
U. Thomas, Automatisierte Programmierung von Robotern für Montageaufgaben, Fortschritte in der Robotik, vol. 13. Shaker Verlag, Aachen, 2008
M.F. Zaeh, M. Wiesbeck, A model for adaptively generating assembly instructions using state-based graph. In: Manufacturing systems and technologies for the new frontier, ed. by M. Mitsuishi, K. Ueda, F. Kimura, Springer, London, 2008, pp. 195–198
D. Ewert, S. Thelen, R. Kunze, M. Mayer, D. Schilberg, S. Jeschke, A graph based hybrid approach of offline pre-planning and online re-planning for efficient assembly under realtime constraints. In: ICIRA 2010: 2010 International Conference on Intelligent Robotics and Application, LNAI, vol. 6425, ed. by H. Liu, H. Ding, Z. Xiong, X. Zhu. Springer, Berlin, 2010, LNAI, vol. 6425, pp. 44–55
M. Mayer, B. Odenthal, M. Faber, W. Kabuss, B. Kausch, C. Schlick, Simulation of human cognition in self-optimizing assembly systems. In: Proceedings of the IEA2009 - 17th World Congress on Ergonomics. 2009
Homem de Mello, L.S., A.C. Sanderson, Representations of mechanical assembly sequences. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 7 (2), 1991, pp. 211–227
R.S. Chen, K.Y. Lu, P.H. Tai, Optimizing assembly planning through a three-stage integrated approach. International Journal of Production Economics 88 (3), 2004, pp. 243–256
P.E. Hart, N.J. Nilsson, B. Raphael, A formal basis for the heuristic determination of minimum cost paths. IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and 4 (2), 2007, pp. 100–107
P. Langley, J.E. Laird, S. Rogers, Cognitive architectures: Research issues and challenges. Journal of Cognitive Systems Research 10 (2), 2009, pp. 141–160
E. Hauck, Ein kognitives Interaktionssystem zur Ansteuerung einer Montagezelle, VDI Reihe 10, vol. 812. VDI-Verlag, Düsseldorf, 2011
D. Schilberg, Architektur eines datenintegrators zur durchgängigen kopplung von verteilten numerischen simulationen. Dissertation, RWTH Aachen, 2010
Gerevini, A. E., P. Haslum, Long, D., Saetti, A., Y. Dimopoulos, Deterministic planning in the fifth international planning competition: Pddl3 and experimental evaluation of the planners. In: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 173, Elsevier Science, 2009, pp. 619–668
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Büscher, C., Hauck, E., Schilberg, D., Jeschke, S. (2016). Measurement of the Cognitive Assembly Planning Impact. In: Frerich, S., et al. Engineering Education 4.0. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46916-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46916-4_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-46915-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-46916-4
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)