Abstract
The question “Quo vadis, Academia?” is posed by scholars, research administrators, journalists and is also ofound in public opinion in Poland in different contexts. Authors of the article do not call into question the necessity of changes of contemporary universities, but they think that the source of changes should be characterized by a bottom-up approach, especially by those who have already achieved extraordinary scientific success and understand the requirement for “creative destruction” of traditional forms of the university (seen as an organization). Changes in university should not be a result of administrators’ and university managers’ decisions (as a top-down approach), but rather should be initiatives caused by the academic community. These engaged initiatives might take different forms – associations, foundations and membership in academic committees as well as different kinds of new social movements. An example of such a social movement is Obywatele Nauki (the Citizens of Academia). Its members are young (usually postdoctorates), as well as more experienced scholars, who – despite the fact of achieving scientific and academic success – are working for the common good and the good of the university, which is seen as an important social institution. One of the goals of the movement is to defy the process of the “de-universitification” of universities. They are against the idea and practice of the neo-liberal university, led by the idea of profit, what is measured by the effectiveness of commercialization of achievements. Authors of the article present ethnographically inspired research among the representatives of the movement. The researches were conducted using ethnographic and anthropological methodologies in the field of higher education studies (also as an action research). Therefore, methods used in this study were the following: interviews (IDI) with leaders and members of the movement and participant observation. An important aspect of the research in the context of conclusions and possible applications, but also for the conceptualization and operationalization of the research, is engagement of both authors in the activities of the movement. Hence, it is necessary to use an auto-ethnography as a specific research perspective.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The pilot study was conducted by the ethnographic method based on in-depth interviews aimed at understanding the meaning of the central and the most important topics (Kvale 2007: 42). The pilot study (interviews) was conducted in February and March 2015 in Warsaw, but the authors have also been participants of the ON movement for 1.5 years (2014–2015). The interviews lasted about 2 hours each and were organized by the authors in Warsaw.
The authors are co-authors of the report with diagnoses of and proposals for changes of Polish science and higher education. This document titled Pact for Science includes a number of solutions and reforms for universities and ministry. The authors of the present article have written numerous texts – academic as well as popular – describing the ON activity (Kola 2015a; Kola 2015b).
References
Alvesson, M. (2013). The triumph of emptiness. Consumption, higher education & work organization. Oxford: University Press.
Angrosino, M. (2007). Doing ethnographic and observational research. London-Los Angeles-New Delhi: SAGE Publication.
Bauman, Z. (2006). Liquid times: Living in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Berman, E. P. (2012). Creating the market university: How academic science became an economic engine. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Bilińska-Suchanek, E. (2003). Opór wobec szkoły: Dorastanie w perspektywie paradygmatu oporu: Studium socjopedagogiczne. wyd. 2. Kraków: Impuls.
Červinková, H., & Gołębniak, B. D. (Eds.). (2010). Badania w działaniu: Pedagogika i antropologia zaangażowane. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Dolnośląskiej Szkoły Wyższej.
Červinková, H., & Gołębniak, B. D. (Eds.). (2013). Edukacyjne badania w działaniu. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
Clark, S. D., Grayson, J. P., & Grayson, L. M. (1975). Prophecy and protest: Social movements in twentieth-century Canada. Toronto: Gage Educational Publishing Ltd.
Collins, R. (2008). Ruchy społeczne jako obiekt uwagi emocjonalnej. In K. Gorlach & P. H. Mooney (Eds.), Dynamika życia społecznego. Współczesne koncepcje ruchów społecznych (pp. 247–261). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
Czerepaniak-Walczak, M. (Ed.). (2013). Fabryki dyplomów czy universitas? O ‘nadwiślańskiej’ wersji przemian w edukacji akademickiej. Kraków: Impuls.
Filippakou, O., & Williams, G. (Eds.). (2015). Higher education as a public good: Critical perspectives on theory, policy and practice (global studies in education). New York-Bern-Frankfurt-Berlin-Brussels-Vienna-Oxford-Warsaw: Peter Lang Publishing Inc.
Fish, S. (1980). Is there a text in this class? The authority of interpretive communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Flick, U. (2007a). Designing qualitative research. London, Los Angeles. New Delhi: SAGE Publication.
Flick, U. (2007b). Managing quality in qualitative research. London, Los Angeles, New Delhi: SAGE Publication.
Gorlach, K., & Mooney, P. H. (Eds.). (2008). Dynamika życia społecznego. Współczesne koncepcje ruchów społecznych. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
Hejwosz, D. (2010). Edukacja uniwersytecka i kreowanie elit społecznych. Kraków: Impuls.
Kola, A. M. (2011). Formy kształcenia elitarnego na poziomie wyższym w Polsce. Rocznik Lubuski, 37(1): 215–229. Special issue titled Recepcja socjologii w Polsce oraz polskie szkolnictwo wyższe na początku XXI wieku, M. Chałubiński & E. Narkiewicz-Niedbalec (Eds.).
Kola, A. M. (2015a). Skąd (i dokąd) ten bunt? Ruch społeczny Obywatele Nauki jako przykład ruchów akademickich wprowadzających zmianę kulturową. Rocznik Pedagogiczny, 38: 127–142.
Kola, A. M. (2015b). The citizens of science as an example of new social movement in academic world In I. N. Sava (Ed.), Social movements in Central and Eastern Europe. A renewal of protests and democracy (pp. 275–284). Bucarest: Universitatea din București.
Kościelniak, C., & Makowski, J. (Eds.). (2012). Freedom. Equality. Warsaw: University, Civic Institute.
Kostera, M. (2005). Antropologia organizacji. Metodologia badań terenowych. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Krzemiński, I. (2013). Solidarność: Niespełniony projekt polskiej demokracji. Gdańsk: Europejskie Centrum Solidarności.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kvale, S. (2007). Doing interviews. London, Los Angeles, New Delhi: SAGE Publication.
Kwieciński, Z. (1992). Socjolpatologia edukacji. Warszawa: IRWiR PAN.
Kwiek, M. (2010). Transformacje uniwersytetu. Zmiany instytucjonalne i ewolucje polityki edukacyjnej w Europie. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.
Kwiek, M. (2015). Uniwersytet w dobie przemian. Instytucje i kadra akademicka w warunkach rosnącej konkurencji. Warszawa: PWN.
Leja, K. (2013). Zarządzanie uczelnią. Koncepcje i współczesne wyzwania. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.
Lenartowicz. (2015). The nature of the university. Higher Education, 69(6): 947–961.
Leslie, L., & Slaughter, S. (1998). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore: University of Illinois Press.
Manifesto of the Citizen of Science. (2012). http://www.sbp.pl/repository/dokumenty/kongres_obywateli_kultury/manifest_ok.pdf
Mason, P. (2013). Why it’s still kicking off everywhere: The new global revolutions. London: Verso.
McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82(6): 1212–1241.
Melosik, Z. (1994). Współczesne amerykańskie spory edukacyjne. Poznań: Wydawnictwo UAM.
Nixon, J. (2012). Higher education and the public good. Imagining the university. London-Oxford-New York- New Delhi-Sydney: Bloomsbury Academic.
Nowosielski, M. (2012). Ruchy społeczne jako czynnik i wynik zmian społecznych. Kultura I Edukacja, 4(90): 7–33.
Nussbaum, M. (2004). Hiding from humanity disgust, shame, and the law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Nussbaum, M. (2010). Not for profit: Why democracy needs the humanities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Poławski, P. (2012). Precarious generation on the Polish labour market. Polityka Społeczna, 1: 15–22.
Potulicka, E., & Rutkowiak, J. (2010). Neoliberalne uwikłania edukacji. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Impuls.
Sennet, R. (1992). The fall of public man. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.
Sennet, R. (2012). Together: The rituals, pleasures, and politics of cooperation. New Haven & London: Yale.
Sławek, T. (2002). Antygona w świecie korporacji. Rozważania o uniwersytecie i czasach obecnych. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
Smelser, N. (1963). Theory of collective behavior. New York: The Free Press.
Standing, G. (2011). The precariat. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Standing, G., & Jandrić, P. (2015). Precariat, education and technologies: Towards a global class identity. Policy Futures in Education, 13(8): 990–994.
Staniszkis, J. (1984). Poland’s self-limiting revolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Staniszkis, J. (2010). Samoograniczająca się rewolucja. Gdańsk: Europejskie Centrum Solidarności.
Szadkowski, K. (2015). Uniwersytet jako dobro wspólne. Podstawy krytycznych badań nad szkolnictwem wyższym. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
Szczepański, J. (1993). Granice reform szkolnictwa wyższego. Nauka I Szkolnictwo Wyższe, 2: 5–10.
Sztompka, P. (2010). Socjologia zmian społecznych. Kraków: Wydawnictwo ZNAK.
Touraine, A. (2010). Solidarność: Analiza ruchu społecznego 1980–1981. Gdańsk: Europejskie Centrum Solidarności.
Touraine, A. (2011). Myśleć inaczej. Warszawa: Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy.
Touraine, A. (2013). Po kryzysie. Warszawa: Oficyna Naukowa.
Wallerstein, I. (2004). World-systems analysis: An introduction. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press.
Waltoś, S., & Rozmus, A. (Eds.). (2012). Kariera naukowa w Polsce. Warunki prawne, społeczne i ekonomiczne. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer SA.
Witkowski, L. (1993). W kręgu pedagogiki radykalnej (dekonstrukcja, walka, etyczność). In Z. Kwieciński & L. Witkowski (Eds.), Spory o edukację. Dylematy i kontrowersje we współczesnych pedagogiach. Warszawa: Instytut Badań Edukacyjnych.
Żuk, P. (2001). Społeczeństwo w działaniu: Ekolodzy, feministki, skłotersi: Socjologiczna analiza nowych ruchów społecznych w Polsce. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
http://www.solidarnosc.org.pl/o-nszz-solidarnosc/o-nszz-solidarnosc/kim-jestesmy
http://www.sbp.pl/repository/dokumenty/kongres_obywateli_kultury/manifest_ok.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Leja, K., Kola, A.M. (2017). The Future of the University? Social Activism among Young Polish Scholars. In: Izak, M., Kostera, M., Zawadzki, M. (eds) The Future of University Education. Palgrave Critical University Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46894-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46894-5_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-46893-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-46894-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)