Skip to main content

The Future of the University? Social Activism among Young Polish Scholars

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Future of University Education

Part of the book series: Palgrave Critical University Studies ((PCU))

Abstract

The question “Quo vadis, Academia?” is posed by scholars, research administrators, journalists and is also ofound in public opinion in Poland in different contexts. Authors of the article do not call into question the necessity of changes of contemporary universities, but they think that the source of changes should be characterized by a bottom-up approach, especially by those who have already achieved extraordinary scientific success and understand the requirement for “creative destruction” of traditional forms of the university (seen as an organization). Changes in university should not be a result of administrators’ and university managers’ decisions (as a top-down approach), but rather should be initiatives caused by the academic community. These engaged initiatives might take different forms – associations, foundations and membership in academic committees as well as different kinds of new social movements. An example of such a social movement is Obywatele Nauki (the Citizens of Academia). Its members are young (usually postdoctorates), as well as more experienced scholars, who – despite the fact of achieving scientific and academic success – are working for the common good and the good of the university, which is seen as an important social institution. One of the goals of the movement is to defy the process of the “de-universitification” of universities. They are against the idea and practice of the neo-liberal university, led by the idea of profit, what is measured by the effectiveness of commercialization of achievements. Authors of the article present ethnographically inspired research among the representatives of the movement. The researches were conducted using ethnographic and anthropological methodologies in the field of higher education studies (also as an action research). Therefore, methods used in this study were the following: interviews (IDI) with leaders and members of the movement and participant observation. An important aspect of the research in the context of conclusions and possible applications, but also for the conceptualization and operationalization of the research, is engagement of both authors in the activities of the movement. Hence, it is necessary to use an auto-ethnography as a specific research perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The pilot study was conducted by the ethnographic method based on in-depth interviews aimed at understanding the meaning of the central and the most important topics (Kvale 2007: 42). The pilot study (interviews) was conducted in February and March 2015 in Warsaw, but the authors have also been participants of the ON movement for 1.5 years (2014–2015). The interviews lasted about 2 hours each and were organized by the authors in Warsaw.

    The authors are co-authors of the report with diagnoses of and proposals for changes of Polish science and higher education. This document titled Pact for Science includes a number of solutions and reforms for universities and ministry. The authors of the present article have written numerous texts – academic as well as popular – describing the ON activity (Kola 2015a; Kola 2015b).

References

  • Alvesson, M. (2013). The triumph of emptiness. Consumption, higher education & work organization. Oxford: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angrosino, M. (2007). Doing ethnographic and observational research. London-Los Angeles-New Delhi: SAGE Publication.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2006). Liquid times: Living in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, E. P. (2012). Creating the market university: How academic science became an economic engine. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bilińska-Suchanek, E. (2003). Opór wobec szkoły: Dorastanie w perspektywie paradygmatu oporu: Studium socjopedagogiczne. wyd. 2. Kraków: Impuls.

    Google Scholar 

  • Červinková, H., & Gołębniak, B. D. (Eds.). (2010). Badania w działaniu: Pedagogika i antropologia zaangażowane. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Dolnośląskiej Szkoły Wyższej.

    Google Scholar 

  • Červinková, H., & Gołębniak, B. D. (Eds.). (2013). Edukacyjne badania w działaniu. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, S. D., Grayson, J. P., & Grayson, L. M. (1975). Prophecy and protest: Social movements in twentieth-century Canada. Toronto: Gage Educational Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. (2008). Ruchy społeczne jako obiekt uwagi emocjonalnej. In K. Gorlach & P. H. Mooney (Eds.), Dynamika życia społecznego. Współczesne koncepcje ruchów społecznych (pp. 247–261). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czerepaniak-Walczak, M. (Ed.). (2013). Fabryki dyplomów czy universitas? O ‘nadwiślańskiej’ wersji przemian w edukacji akademickiej. Kraków: Impuls.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filippakou, O., & Williams, G. (Eds.). (2015). Higher education as a public good: Critical perspectives on theory, policy and practice (global studies in education). New York-Bern-Frankfurt-Berlin-Brussels-Vienna-Oxford-Warsaw: Peter Lang Publishing Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fish, S. (1980). Is there a text in this class? The authority of interpretive communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flick, U. (2007a). Designing qualitative research. London, Los Angeles. New Delhi: SAGE Publication.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Flick, U. (2007b). Managing quality in qualitative research. London, Los Angeles, New Delhi: SAGE Publication.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gorlach, K., & Mooney, P. H. (Eds.). (2008). Dynamika życia społecznego. Współczesne koncepcje ruchów społecznych. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hejwosz, D. (2010). Edukacja uniwersytecka i kreowanie elit społecznych. Kraków: Impuls.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kola, A. M. (2011). Formy kształcenia elitarnego na poziomie wyższym w Polsce. Rocznik Lubuski, 37(1): 215–229. Special issue titled Recepcja socjologii w Polsce oraz polskie szkolnictwo wyższe na początku XXI wieku, M. Chałubiński & E. Narkiewicz-Niedbalec (Eds.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kola, A. M. (2015a). Skąd (i dokąd) ten bunt? Ruch społeczny Obywatele Nauki jako przykład ruchów akademickich wprowadzających zmianę kulturową. Rocznik Pedagogiczny, 38: 127–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kola, A. M. (2015b). The citizens of science as an example of new social movement in academic world In I. N. Sava (Ed.), Social movements in Central and Eastern Europe. A renewal of protests and democracy (pp. 275–284). Bucarest: Universitatea din București.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kościelniak, C., & Makowski, J. (Eds.). (2012). Freedom. Equality. Warsaw: University, Civic Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostera, M. (2005). Antropologia organizacji. Metodologia badań terenowych. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krzemiński, I. (2013). Solidarność: Niespełniony projekt polskiej demokracji. Gdańsk: Europejskie Centrum Solidarności.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvale, S. (2007). Doing interviews. London, Los Angeles, New Delhi: SAGE Publication.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kwieciński, Z. (1992). Socjolpatologia edukacji. Warszawa: IRWiR PAN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwiek, M. (2010). Transformacje uniwersytetu. Zmiany instytucjonalne i ewolucje polityki edukacyjnej w Europie. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwiek, M. (2015). Uniwersytet w dobie przemian. Instytucje i kadra akademicka w warunkach rosnącej konkurencji. Warszawa: PWN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leja, K. (2013). Zarządzanie uczelnią. Koncepcje i współczesne wyzwania. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenartowicz. (2015). The nature of the university. Higher Education, 69(6): 947–961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, L., & Slaughter, S. (1998). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manifesto of the Citizen of Science. (2012). http://www.sbp.pl/repository/dokumenty/kongres_obywateli_kultury/manifest_ok.pdf

  • Mason, P. (2013). Why it’s still kicking off everywhere: The new global revolutions. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82(6): 1212–1241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melosik, Z. (1994). Współczesne amerykańskie spory edukacyjne. Poznań: Wydawnictwo UAM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, J. (2012). Higher education and the public good. Imagining the university. London-Oxford-New York- New Delhi-Sydney: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowosielski, M. (2012). Ruchy społeczne jako czynnik i wynik zmian społecznych. Kultura I Edukacja, 4(90): 7–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2004). Hiding from humanity disgust, shame, and the law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2010). Not for profit: Why democracy needs the humanities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poławski, P. (2012). Precarious generation on the Polish labour market. Polityka Społeczna, 1: 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potulicka, E., & Rutkowiak, J. (2010). Neoliberalne uwikłania edukacji. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Impuls.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennet, R. (1992). The fall of public man. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennet, R. (2012). Together: The rituals, pleasures, and politics of cooperation. New Haven & London: Yale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sławek, T. (2002). Antygona w świecie korporacji. Rozważania o uniwersytecie i czasach obecnych. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smelser, N. (1963). Theory of collective behavior. New York: The Free Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Standing, G. (2011). The precariat. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standing, G., & Jandrić, P. (2015). Precariat, education and technologies: Towards a global class identity. Policy Futures in Education, 13(8): 990–994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staniszkis, J. (1984). Poland’s self-limiting revolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staniszkis, J. (2010). Samoograniczająca się rewolucja. Gdańsk: Europejskie Centrum Solidarności.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szadkowski, K. (2015). Uniwersytet jako dobro wspólne. Podstawy krytycznych badań nad szkolnictwem wyższym. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szczepański, J. (1993). Granice reform szkolnictwa wyższego. Nauka I Szkolnictwo Wyższe, 2: 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sztompka, P. (2010). Socjologia zmian społecznych. Kraków: Wydawnictwo ZNAK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Touraine, A. (2010). Solidarność: Analiza ruchu społecznego 1980–1981. Gdańsk: Europejskie Centrum Solidarności.

    Google Scholar 

  • Touraine, A. (2011). Myśleć inaczej. Warszawa: Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Touraine, A. (2013). Po kryzysie. Warszawa: Oficyna Naukowa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, I. (2004). World-systems analysis: An introduction. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltoś, S., & Rozmus, A. (Eds.). (2012). Kariera naukowa w Polsce. Warunki prawne, społeczne i ekonomiczne. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer SA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witkowski, L. (1993). W kręgu pedagogiki radykalnej (dekonstrukcja, walka, etyczność). In Z. Kwieciński & L. Witkowski (Eds.), Spory o edukację. Dylematy i kontrowersje we współczesnych pedagogiach. Warszawa: Instytut Badań Edukacyjnych.

    Google Scholar 

  • Żuk, P. (2001). Społeczeństwo w działaniu: Ekolodzy, feministki, skłotersi: Socjologiczna analiza nowych ruchów społecznych w Polsce. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.

    Google Scholar 

  • http://www.solidarnosc.org.pl/o-nszz-solidarnosc/o-nszz-solidarnosc/kim-jestesmy

  • http://www.sbp.pl/repository/dokumenty/kongres_obywateli_kultury/manifest_ok.pdf

  • http://obywatelenauki.pl/popieraja-nas/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Krzysztof Leja .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Leja, K., Kola, A.M. (2017). The Future of the University? Social Activism among Young Polish Scholars. In: Izak, M., Kostera, M., Zawadzki, M. (eds) The Future of University Education. Palgrave Critical University Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46894-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46894-5_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-46893-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-46894-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics