Skip to main content

Geostatistical Methods for Unconventional Reservoir Uncertainty Assessments

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Geostatistics Valencia 2016

Part of the book series: Quantitative Geology and Geostatistics ((QGAG,volume 19))

  • 1803 Accesses

Abstract

New methods are required to support unconventional reservoir uncertainty modeling. Unconventional plays add additional complexity with greater uncertainty in direct reservoir measures (e.g., unreliable permeability measures in low-permeability rock) and weakened relationships between currently measurable reservoir properties and production results (production mechanisms may not be well understood). As a result, unconventional plays are often referred to as “statistical plays,” suggesting the reliance on statistical characterization of production distributions as a function of well counts. The application of the techniques described herein can be utilized to integrate all available information to determine appropriate levels of drilling activity to reduce uncertainty to an acceptable level.

Geostatistical approaches provide opportunities to improve the rigor in the dealing with statistical plays. Rigor is introduced through integration of methods that account for representative statistics, spatial continuity, volume-variance relations, and parameter uncertainty.

Analog production data from US shale gas plays are utilized for demonstration. These datasets, after debiasing, are sources for analog production rate distributions and spatial continuity. Given these statistics along with a decision of stationarity, geostatistical workflows provide repeatable uncertainty models that may be summarized over a spectrum of model parameters, drilling strategy, and well counts.

These geostatistical methods do not replace the need for expert judgment, but they improve the rigor of statistical-based approaches that are essential in statistical plays.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Deutsch JL, Deutsch CV (2010) Some geostatistical software implementation details. CCG Paper 2010-412, Centre for Computational Geostatistics, University of Alberta, Edmonton

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch CV, Journel AG (1998) GSLIB: geostatistical software library and user’s guide, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Efron B (1982) The jackknife, the bootstrap, and other resampling plans. Society for Industrial and Applied Math, Philadelphia

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frykman P, Deutsch CV (2002) Practical application of geostatistical scaling laws for data integration. Petrophysics 43(3):153–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Journel AG (1994) Resampling from stochastic simulations. Environ Ecol Stat 1:63–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Journel AG, Huijbregts C (1978) Mining geostatistics. Academic, New York City, 600 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Olea RA, Houseknecht DW, Garrity CP, Cook TA (2011) Formulation of a correlated variables methodology for assessment of continuous gas resources with an application to the Woodford play, Arkoma Basin, eastern Oklahoma. Boletín Geológico y Minero, 122 (4), pp 483–496. ISSN: 0366-0176

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyrcz MJ, Deutsch CV (2012) Uncertainty models for exploration and appraisal of shale gas. CCG Paper 2012-131, Centre for Computational Geo-statistics, University of Alberta, Edmonton

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyrcz MJ, Deutsch CV (2014) Geostatistical reservoir modeling, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York, p 448

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyrcz MJ, Gringarten E, Frykman P, Deutsch CV (2006) Representative input parameters for geostatistical simulation. In: Coburn TC, Yarus RJ, Chambers RL (eds) Stochastic modeling and geostatistics: principles, methods and case studies, vol II and 5. AAPG Computer Applications in Geology, pp 123–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Society of Petroleum Evaluation Engineers (2010) Guidelines for the practical evaluation of undeveloped reserves in resource plays. Monograph 3

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilde BJ, Deutsch CV (2013) A methodology for quantifying uncertainty versus data spacing applied to the oil sands. CIM J

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are appreciative to Chevron Energy Technology Company for support of this work and for allowing this publication. Also, the constructive reviews of two anonymous reviewers are appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J. Pyrcz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pyrcz, M.J., Janele, P., Weaver, D., Strebelle, S. (2017). Geostatistical Methods for Unconventional Reservoir Uncertainty Assessments. In: Gómez-Hernández, J., Rodrigo-Ilarri, J., Rodrigo-Clavero, M., Cassiraga, E., Vargas-Guzmán, J. (eds) Geostatistics Valencia 2016. Quantitative Geology and Geostatistics, vol 19. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46819-8_45

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics