Skip to main content

Using Spatial Constraints in Clustering for Electrofacies Calculation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1694 Accesses

Part of the book series: Quantitative Geology and Geostatistics ((QGAG,volume 19))

Abstract

Petroleum reservoir geological models are usually built in two steps. First, a 3-D model of geological bodies is computed, within which rock properties are expected to be stationary and to have low variability. Such geological domains are referred to as “facies” and are often “electrofacies” obtained by clustering petrophysical log curves and calibrating the results with core data. It can happen that log responses of different types of rock are too similar to enable satisfactory estimation of the facies. In such situations, taking into account the spatial aspect of the data might help the discriminative process. Since the clustering algorithms that are used in this context usually fail to do so, we propose a method to overcome such limitations. It consists in post-calibrating the estimated probabilities of the presence of each facies in the samples, using geological trends determined by experts. The final facies probability is estimated by a simple kriging of the initial ones. Measurement errors reflecting the confidence in the clustering algorithms are added to the model, and the target mean is taken as the aforementioned geological trend. Assets and liabilities of this approach are reviewed; in particular, theoretical and practical issues about stationarity, neighborhood choice, and possible generalizations are discussed. The estimation of the variance to be assigned to each data point is also analyzed. As the class probabilities sum up to one, the classes are not independent; solutions are proposed in each context. This approach can be applied for extending class probabilities in 3-D.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Aitchison D (1986) The statistical analysis of compositional data. Chapman & Hall, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Garner DL, Yarus J, Srivastava M (2015) Modeling three ways from electro-facies – categorical, e-facies probabilities and petrophysics with assignment. Petroleum Geostatistics 2015, 7–11 September. Biarritz

    Google Scholar 

  • Lan Z, Leuangthong O, Deutsch CV (2006) Why Logratios are a bad idea for multiscale facies modeling, Centre for computational geostatistics report 8. University of Alberta, Canada, p 211

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlowsky V, Olea RA, Davis JC (1994) Additive logratio estimation of regionalized compositional data: an application to the calculation of oil reserves. In: Dimitrakopoulos R (ed) Geostatistics for the next century. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 371–382

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Walvoort D, de Guijter J (2001) Compositional kriging: a spatial interpolation method for compositional data. Math Geol 33(8):951–966

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Marc Chautru .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chautru, JM., Chautru, E., Garner, D., Srivastava, R.M., Yarus, J. (2017). Using Spatial Constraints in Clustering for Electrofacies Calculation. In: Gómez-Hernández, J., Rodrigo-Ilarri, J., Rodrigo-Clavero, M., Cassiraga, E., Vargas-Guzmán, J. (eds) Geostatistics Valencia 2016. Quantitative Geology and Geostatistics, vol 19. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46819-8_31

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics