Advertisement

Prediction of Bank Telemarketing with Co-training of Mixture-of-Experts and MLP

  • Jae-Min Yu
  • Sung-Bae ChoEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9950)

Abstract

Utilization of financial data becomes one of the important issues for user adaptive marketing on the bank service. The marketing is conducted based on personal information with various facts that affect a success (clients agree to accept financial instrument). Personal information can be collected continuously anytime if clients want to agree to use own information in case of opening an account in bank, but labeling all the data needs to pay a high cost. In this paper, focusing on this characteristics of financial data, we present a global-local co-training (GLCT) algorithm to utilize labeled and unlabeled data to construct better prediction model. We performed experiments using real-world data from Portuguese bank. Experiments show that GLCT performs well regardless of the ratio of initial labeled data. Through the series of iterating experiments, we obtained better results on various aspects.

Keywords

Bank telemarketing Semi-supervised learning Machine learning 

References

  1. 1.
    Jacobs, R., Jordan, M., Nowlan, S., Hinton, G.: Adaptive mixture local experts. Neural Comput. 3(4), 79–87 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Duda, R.O., Hart, P.E.: Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis. Wiley, Chichester (1993)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang, W., Zhou, Z.-H.: Analyzing co-training style algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 18th European Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 454–465 (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blum, A., Mitchell, T.: Combining labeled and unlabeled data with co-training. In: Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference on Computational Learning Theory, pp. 92–100 (1998)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goldman, S., Zhou, Y.: Enhancing supervised learning with unlabeled data. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 327–334 (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kuncheva, L.I.: Clustering-and-selection model for classifier combination. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Knowledge-Based Intelligent Engineering Systems and Allied Technologies, vol. 1, pp. 185–188 (2000)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    West, D.: Neural network credit scoring models. Comput. Oper. Res. 27, 11–12 (2000)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hung, C., Chen, J.H.: A selective ensemble based on expected probabilities for bankruptcy prediction. Expert Syst. Appl. 36(3), 5297–5303 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shin, K.S., Han, I.: A case-based approach using inductive indexing for corporate bond rating. Decis. Support Syst. 32(1), 41–52 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Huang, Z., Chen, H., Hsu, C.J., Chen, W.H., Wu, S.S.: Credit rating analysis with support vector machines and neural networks: a market comparative study. Decis. Support Syst. 37(4), 543–558 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Li, S.T., Shiue, W., Huang, M.H.: The evaluation of consumer loans using support vector machines. Expert Syst. Appl. 30(4), 772–782 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tsai, C.F., Chen, M.L.: Credit rating by hybrid machine learning techniques. Appl. Soft Comput. 10(2), 374–380 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Milad, M., Vural, A.: Risk assessment in social lending via random forests. Expert Syst. Appl. 42(10), 4621–4631 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yoon, J.-W., Cho, S.-B.: Global/local hybrid learning of mixture-of-experts from labeled and unlabeled data. In: Corchado, E., Kurzyński, M., Woźniak, M. (eds.) HAIS 2011, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6678, pp. 452–459. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceYonsei UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations