Abstract
As robots are increasingly used in Search and Rescue (SAR) missions, it becomes highly relevant to study how SAR robots can be developed and deployed in a responsible way. In contrast to some other robot application domains, e.g. military and healthcare, the ethics of robot-assisted SAR are relatively under examined. This paper aims to fill this gap by assessing and analyzing important values and value tensions of stakeholders of SAR robots. The paper describes the outcomes of several Value Assessment workshops that were conducted with rescue workers, in the context of a European research project on robot-assisted SAR (the TRADR project). The workshop outcomes are analyzed and key ethical concerns and dilemmas are identified and discussed. Several recommendations for future ethics research leading to responsible development and deployment of SAR robots are provided.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
References
Arkin R (2009) Governing lethal behavior in autonomous robots. CRC Press
Birk A, Carpin S (2006) Rescue robotics—a crucial milestone on the road to autonomous systems. Adv Robot 20(5):595–605
Bos J, Mol E, Visser B, Frings-Dresen MH (2004) The physical demands upon (dutch) fire-fighters in relation to the maximum acceptable energetic workload. Ergonomics 47(4):446–460
Butter M, Rensma A, Boxsel Jv, Kalisingh S, Schoone M, Leis M, Gelderblom G, Cremers G, Wilt Md, Kortekaas W, et al (2008) Robotics for healthcare: final report
Chang CM, Lee LC, Connor KM, Davidson JR, Jeffries K, Lai TJ (2003) Posttraumatic distress and coping strategies among rescue workers after an earthquake. J Nervous Ment Dis 191(6):391–398
Decker M (2008) Caregiving robots and ethical reflection: the perspective of interdisciplinary technology assessment. Ai Soc 22(3):315–330
Docherty BL (2012) Losing Humanity: the case against killer robots. Human Rights Watch
Fincannon T, Barnes LE, Murphy RR, Riddle DL (2004) Evidence of the need for social intelligence in rescue robots. In: IEEE/RSJ international conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), vol 2. IEEE, pp 1089–1095
Friedman B, Hendry D (2012) The envisioning cards: a toolkit for catalyzing humanistic and technical imaginations. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, pp 1145–1148
Friedman B, Kahn PH Jr, Borning A, Huldtgren A (2013) Value sensitive design and information systems. In: Early engagement and new technologies: opening up the laboratory. Springer, pp 55–95
Fullerton CS, McCarroll JE, Ursano RJ, Wright KM (1992) Psychological responses of rescue workers: fire fighters and trauma. Am J Orthopsychiatry 62(3):371
Geale SK (2012) The ethics of disaster management. Disaster Prev Manage Int J 21(4):445–462
Harbers M, Detweiler C, Neerincx MA (2015) Embedding stakeholder values in the requirements engineering process. In: Requirements engineering: foundation for software quality. Springer,pp 318–332
Ingram B, Jones D, Lewis A, Richards M, Rich C, Schachterle L (2010) A code of ethics for robotics engineers. In: 2010 5th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pp 103–104
Kruijff GJM, Janíček M (2011) Using doctrines for human-robot collaboration to guide ethical behavior. In: AAAI fall symposium: robot-human teamwork in dynamic adverse environment
Kruijff-Korbayová I, Colas F, Gianni M, Pirri F, de Greeff J, Hindriks K, Neerincx M, Ögren P, Svoboda T, Worst R (2015) TRADR project: long-term human-robot teaming for robot assisted disaster response. KI - Künstliche Intelligenz, pp 1–9
Łichocki P, Billard A, Kahn PH Jr (2011) The ethical landscape of robotics. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 18(1):39–50
Lin P, Abney K, Bekey GA (2011) Robot ethics: the ethical and social implications of robotics. MIT Press
Lin P, Bekey GA, Abney K (2009) Robots in war: issues of risk and ethics
Lucas GR Jr (2011) Industrial challenges of military robotics. J Militar Ethics 10(4):274–295
Malle BF, Scheutz M, Arnold T, Voiklis J, Cusimano C (2015) Sacrifice one for the good of many?: People apply different moral norms to human and robot agents. In: Proceedings of the tenth annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction, HRI ’15. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 117–124
Miller JK, Friedman B, Jancke G, Gill B (2007) Value tensions in design: the value sensitive design, development, and appropriation of a corporation’s groupware system. In: Proceedings of the 2007 international ACM conference on supporting group work. ACM, pp 281–290
Murphy RR (2004) Human-robot interaction in rescue robotics. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part C 34(2):138–153
Murphy RR (2014) Disaster robotics. MIT Press
Murphy RR, Woods DD (2009) Beyond asimov: the three laws of responsible robotics. IEEE Intell Syst 24(4):14–20
Murphy RR, Dreger KL, Newsome S, Rodocker J, Slaughter B, Smith R, Steimle E, Kimura T, Makabe K, Kon K, Mizumoto H, Hatayama M, Matsuno F, Tadokoro S, Kawase O (2012) Marine heterogeneous multirobot systems at the great eastern japan tsunami recovery. J Field Robot 29(5):819–831
Noorman M, Johnson D (2014) Negotiating autonomy and responsibility in military robots. Ethics Inf Technol 16(1):51–62
Okada Y, Nagatani K, Yoshida K, Tadokoro S, Yoshida T, Koyanagi E (2011) Shared autonomy system for tracked vehicles on rough terrain based on continuous three-dimensional terrain scanning. J Field Robot 28(6):875–893
Prieur M (2012) Council of Europe. European and Mediterranean Major Hazards Agreement (EUR-OPA). http://www.preventionweb.net/english/professional/publications/v.php?id=26384. Accessed 17 June 2015
Riek LD, Howard D (2014) A code of ethics for the human-robot interaction profession. Proceedings of We Robot
Sandin P (2009) Firefighting ethics: principlism for burning issues. Ethical Perspect 16(2):225–251
Sharkey A, Sharkey N (2012) Granny and the robots: ethical issues in robot care for the elderly. Ethics Inf Technol 14(1):27–40
Sparrow R (2007) Killer robots. J Appl Philos 24(1):62–77
Veruggio G (2006) The euron roboethics roadmap. In: 2006 6th IEEE-RAS international conference on humanoid robots. IEEE, pp 612–617
van Wynsberghe A (2013) Designing robots for care: care centered value-sensitive design. Sci Eng Ethics 19(2):407–433
Wallach W, Allen C (2008) Moral machines: teaching robots right from wrong. Oxford University Press
Zuzánek P, Zimmermann K, Hlavác V (2014) Accepted autonomy for search and rescue robotics. In: Modelling and simulation for autonomous systems: first international workshop, MESAS 2014, Rome, Italy, 5–6 May 2014, Revised Selected Papers, vol 8906. Springer, p 231
Acknowledgements
This work is funded by the EU FP7 TRADR project (grant no. 60963).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Harbers, M., de Greeff, J., Kruijff-Korbayová, I., Neerincx, M.A., Hindriks, K.V. (2017). Exploring the Ethical Landscape of Robot-Assisted Search and Rescue. In: Aldinhas Ferreira, M., Silva Sequeira, J., Tokhi, M., E. Kadar, E., Virk, G. (eds) A World with Robots. Intelligent Systems, Control and Automation: Science and Engineering, vol 84. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46667-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46667-5_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-46665-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-46667-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)