Skip to main content

Behavioral Differences Between Near Eastern Neanderthals and the Early Modern Humans from Skhul and Qafzeh: An Assessment Based on Comparative Samples of Holocene Humans

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Human Paleontology and Prehistory

Abstract

The differences and similarities between Near Eastern Neanderthals and the early modern humans from Skhul and Qafzeh in Israel have long been a point of study and debate. Conclusions about the magnitude and especially the implications of the differences have served as evidence to support or refute competing hypotheses about their cultural and biological differences. Here we revisit the controversy by assessing the midshaft shapes and robusticity of the femur , tibial , humerus , and radius of these Middle Paleolithic samples in comparison to European Neanderthals, Gravettian modern humans, several modern individuals from other late Pleistocene cultures in Europe and Israel, and a diverse set of Holocene humans from around the globe. The results show that the Near Eastern Neanderthals resemble European Neanderthals as well as a diverse array of modern agriculturalists and intensive foragers. In contrast, the people from Skhul and Qafzeh are much more distinct from recent samples but bear a degree of resemblance to Khoesan and Zulu males and females, Amud 1 , and Ohalo 2 . Additional insights emerge when the upper and lower limb are considered separately, but the result remains that the early moderns rather than Neanderthals seem to have faced an unusual, or at least uncommon, set of mechanical demands in comparison to most of the more recent groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arensburg, B., Bar-Yosef, O., Chech, M., Goldberg, P., Laville, H., Meignen, L., et al. (1985). Une sepulture Neanderthalienne dans la grotte de Kebara (Israel). Comptes Rendue de l’Académie des Sciences Paris, 300, 227–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auerbach, B. M., & Ruff, C. B. (2004). Human body mass estimation: A comparison of morphometric and mechanical methods. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 125, 331–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Yosef, O. (2000). The Middle and early Upper Paleolithic in Southwest Asia and neighboring regions. In O. Bar-Yosef & D. Pilbeam (Eds.), The geography of Neanderthals and modern humans in Europe and the greater Mediterranean (Peabody Museum Bulletin 8) (pp. 107–156). Cambridge, MA: Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Yosef, O., & Vandermeersch, B. (Eds.). (1991). Le Squelette Moustérien de Kébara 2 (Cahiers de Paléoanthropologie). Paris: Éditions du CNRS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Itzhak, S., Smith, P., & Bloom, R. A. (1988). Radiographic study of the humerus in Neanderthals and Homo sapiens sapiens. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 77, 231–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, P. S. (1989). Changes in activities with the shift to agriculture in the Southeastern United States. Current Anthropology, 30, 385–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, K. J., Grine, F. E., & Pearson, O. M. (2007). Robusticity and sexual dimorphism in the postcranium of modern hunter-gatherers from Australia. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 134, 9–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, S. E. (1994). Human upper body evolution in the Eurasian later pleistocene. Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of New Mexico at Albuquerque.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, S. E., & Formicola, V. (1997). A case of marked bilateral asymmetry in the upper limbs of an Upper Palaeolithic male from Barma Grande (Liguria), Italy. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 7, 18–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, S. E., Pearson, O. M., Grine, F. E., Trinkaus, E., & Holliday, T. W. (1996). Morphological affinities of the proximal ulna from Klasies River Mouth Main Site: Archaic or modern? Journal of Human Evolution, 31, 213–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, S. (1989). The influence of economic behaviour and environment upon robusticity of the post-cranial skeleton: A comparison of Australian Aborigines and other populations. Archaeology in Oceania, 24, 17–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endo, B., & Kimura, T. (1970). Postcranial skeleton of the Amud Man. In H. Suzuki & F. Takai (Eds.), The Amud man and his cave site (pp. 231–406). Tokyo: Academic Press of Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grine, F. E., Jungers, W. L., Tobias, P. V., & Pearson, O. M. (1995). Fossil Homo femur from Berg Aukas, northern Namibia. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 97, 151–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, B.M. (2003). Mobility in Upper Paleolithic and Mesolithic Europe: Evidence from the lower limb. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 122, 200–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovers, E. (2001). Territorial behavior in the Middle Paleolithic of the southern Levant. In N. J. Conard (Ed.), Settlement dynamics of the Middle Paleolithic and Middle Stone Age (pp. 123–152). Tübingen: Kerns Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovers, E. (2006). Neanderthals and modern humans in the Middle Paleolithic of the Levant: What kind of interaction? In N. J. Conard (Ed.), When Neanderthals and modern humans met (pp. 65–75). Tübingen: Kerns Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovers, E., & Belfer-Cohen, A. (2013). On variability and complexity: Lessons from the Levantine Middle Paleolithic record. Current Anthropology, 54, S337–S357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jungers, W. L., & Minns, R. J. (1979). Computed tomography and biomechanical analysis of fossil long bones. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 50, 285–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, R. L. (1995). The foraging spectrum: Diversity in hunter-gatherer lifeways. Washington DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, C. S. (1995). Biological changes in human populations with agriculture. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 185–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, D. E. (1993). The rise and fall of seasonal mobility among hunter-gatherers: The case of the southern Levant. Current Anthropology, 34, 599–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, D. E. (1998). Neanderthal and early modern human mobility patterns: Comparing archaeological and anatomical evidence. In T. Akazawa, K. Aoki, & O. Bar-Yosef (Eds.), Neanderthals and modern humans in Western Asia (pp. 263–275). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, D. E., & Shea, J. J. (1994). Behavioral differences between archaic and modern humans in the Levantine Mousterian. American Anthropology, 96, 300–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, D. E., Devlin, M. J., & Pearson, O. M. (2001). Articular surface area responses to mechanical loading: Effects of exercise, age and skeletal location. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 116, 266–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marlowe, F. W. (2005). Hunter-gatherers and human evolution. Evolutionary Anthropology, 14, 54–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, B. D., Burr, D. B., & Sharkey, N. A. (1998). Skeletal tissue mechanics. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McCown, T. D., & Keith, A. (1939). The Stone Age of Mount Carmel, II: The fossil human remains from the Levalloiso-Mousterian. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, O. M. (1997). Postcranial morphology and the origin of modern humans. Ph.D. Dissertation, Stony Brook University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, O. M. (2000). Activity, climate, and postcranial robusticity: Implications for modern human origins and scenarios of adaptive change. Current Anthropology, 41, 569–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, O. M., & Grine, F. E. (1996). Morphology of the Border Cave hominid ulna and humerus. South African Journal of Science, 92, 231–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, O. M., & Grine, F. E. (1997). Re-analysis of the hominid radii from Cave of Hearths and Klasies River Mouth, South Africa. Journal of Human Evolution, 32, 577–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, O. M., & Millones, M. (2005). Rasgos esqueléticos de adaptación al clima y a la actividad entre los habitantes aborígenes de Tierra del Fuego (Skeletal traces of adaptation to climate and activity among the aboriginal inhabitants of Tierra del Fuego). Magellania, 33, 37–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, O. M., Cordero, R. M., & Busby, A. M. (2006). How different were Neanderthals’ habitual activities? A comparative analysis with diverse groups of recent humans. In K. Harvati & T. Harrison (Eds.), Neanderthals revisited: New approaches and perspectives (pp. 89–112). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, O.M., Grine, F. E., Fleagle, J. G., & Royer, D. F. (2008). A description of the Omo 1 postcranial skeleton, including newly discovered fossils. Journal of Human Evolution, 55, 421–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, O. M., Petersen, T. R., Sparacello, V. S., Daneshvari, S., & Grine, F. E. (2014). Activity, body shape, and cross-sectional geometry of the femur and tibia. In K. Carlson & D. Marchi (Eds.), Mobility: Interpreting behavior from skeletal adaptations and environmental interactions (pp. 133–151). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, T. R., Pearson, O. M., & Grine, F. E. (in preparation). Prediction of long bone cross-sectional geometric properties from external dimensions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rak, Y. (1990). On the differences between two pelvises of Mousterian context from Qafzeh and Kebara Caves, Israel. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 81, 323–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rak, Y., & Arensburg, B. (1987). Kebara 2 Neanderthal pelvis: First look at a complete inlet. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 73, 227–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruff, C. (1987). Sexual dimorphism in human lower limb bone structure: Relationship to subsistence strategy and sexual division of labor. Journal of Human Evolution, 16, 391–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruff, C. B. (1995). Biomechanics of the hip and birth in early Homo. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 98, 527–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruff, C. B. (2000). Body size, body shape, and long bone strength in modern humans. Journal of Human Evolution, 38, 269–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruff, C. B., Trinkaus, E., Walker, A., & Larsen, C. S. (1993). Postcranial robusticity in Homo. I: Temporal trends and mechanical interpretation. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 91, 21–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruff, C. B., Holt, B. M., Sládek, V., Berner, M., Murphy, Jr. W. A., zur Nedden, D., et al. (2005). Body size, body shape, and mobility of the Tyrolean “Iceman”. Journal of Human Evolution, 51, 91–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, C. N., & Stock, J. T. (2011). The influence of body proportions on femoral and tibial midshaft shape in hunter-gatherers. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 144, 22–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, C. N., & Stock, J. T. (2013). Extreme mobility in the Late Pleistocene? Comparing limb biomechanics among fossil Homo, varsity athletes and Holocene foragers. Journal of Human Evolution, 64, 242–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, C. N., Hofmann, C. L., Petraglia, M. D., Stock, J. T., & Gottschall, J. S. (2012). Neanderthal humeri may reflect adaptation to scraping tasks, but not spear thrusting. PLoS ONE, 7, e40349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, J. J. (1998). Neanderthal and early modern human behavioral variability: A regional-scale approach to lithic evidence for hunting in the Levantine Mousterian. Current Anthropology, 39, S45–S78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P., Bloom, R. A., & Berkowitz, J. (1984). Diachronic trends in humeral cortical thickness of Near Eastern populations. Journal of Human Evolution, 13, 603–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solecki, R. S. (1963). Prehistory of Shanidar valley, northern Iraq. Science, 139, 179–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparacello, V. S., & Pearson, O. M. (2010). The importance of accounting for the area of the medullary cavity in cross-sectional geometry: A test based on the femoral midshaft. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 143, 612–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stock, J. T., & Shaw, C. N. (2007). Which measures of diaphyseal robusticity are robust? A comparison of external methods of quantifying the strength of long bone diaphyses to cross-sectional geometric properties. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 134, 412–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trinkaus, E. (1983a). The Shanidar Neanderthals. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trinkaus, E. (1983b). Neanderthal postcrania and the adaptive shift to modern humans. In Trinkaus, E. (Ed.), The Mousterian legacy: Human biocultural changes in the Upper Pleistocene (pp. 165–200). (BAR International Series 164). Oxford: BAR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trinkaus, E. (1984). Western Asia. In F. H. Smith & F. Spencer (Eds.), The origins of modern humans: A world survey of the fossil evidence (pp. 251–293). New York: Alan R. Liss.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trinkaus, E. (1992). Morphological contrasts between the Near Eastern Qafzeh-Skhul and late archaic human samples: Grounds for a behavioral difference? In T. Akazawa, K. Aoki, & T. Kimura (Eds.), The evolution and dispersal of modern humans in Asia (pp. 277–294). Tokyo: Hokusen-Sha Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trinkaus, E. (1993). Femoral neck-shaft angles of the Qafzeh-Skhul early modern humans, and activity levels among immature Near Eastern Middle Paleolithic hominids. Journal of Human Evolution, 25, 393–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trinkaus, E., & Churchill, S. E. (1999). Diaphyseal cross-sectional geometry of Near Eastern Middle Paleolithic humans: The humerus. Journal of Archaeological Science, 26, 173–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trinkaus, E., & Ruff, C. B. (1999a). Diaphyseal cross-sectional geometry of Near Eastern Middle Paleolithic humans: The femur. Journal of Archaeological Science, 26, 409–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trinkaus, E., & Ruff, C. B. (1999b). Diaphyseal cross-sectional geometry of Near Eastern Middle Palaeolithic humans: The tibia. Journal of Archaeological Science, 26, 1289–1300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trinkaus, E., & Ruff, C. B. (2012). Femoral and tibial diaphyseal cross-sectional geometry in Pleistocene Homo. PaleoAnthropology, 2012, 13–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trinkaus, E., Churchill, S. E., Villemeur, I., Riley, K. G., Heller, J. A., & Ruff, C. B. (1991). Robusticity versus shape: The functional interpretation of Neandertal appendicular morphology. Journal of the Anthropological Society of Nippon, 99, 257–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trinkaus, E., Churchill, S. E., & Ruff, C. B. (1994). Postcranial robusticity in Homo. II: Bilateral asymmetry and bone plasticity. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 93, 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandermeersch, B. (1981). Les hommes fossiles de Qafzeh (Israël). (Cahiers de Paléontologie). Paris: CNRS.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

It is a great privilege to participate in this volume in honor of Professor Yoel Rak. Paleoanthropology always feels more exciting, more vivid, and more fun whenever Yoel is involved. His passion for the subject is perhaps only matched by his artist’s eye for morphology and his amazing kindness and generosity to colleagues as well as to students just beginning their careers. One of OMP’s happiest memories of working on the 1992 field season at Hayonim Cave came when, during our visit to his office in Tel Aviv, Yoel brought out the skeleton of Kebara 2 for a small crowd of excited graduate students. It was OMP’s first look at a real Neanderthal skeleton and many of the impressions of the skeleton’s morphology that flooded into OMP’s mind are emblazoned there permanently, associated with a cozy feeling of happiness and excitement.

Funds to collect the data were provided by the National Science Foundation, the Wenner-Gren Foundation, the Boise Fund, John C. Pearson, and the University of New Mexico. Lastly, many curators at a large number of collections as well as the heirs of Max Lohest graciously allowed access to the fossils and recent skeletons in their care. Comments from two anonymous reviewers and Professor Erella Hovers helped to improve the manuscript. We are very grateful to them all.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Osbjorn M. Pearson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pearson, O.M., Sparacello, V.S. (2017). Behavioral Differences Between Near Eastern Neanderthals and the Early Modern Humans from Skhul and Qafzeh: An Assessment Based on Comparative Samples of Holocene Humans. In: Marom, A., Hovers, E. (eds) Human Paleontology and Prehistory. Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46646-0_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics