Abstract
IT solutions provide international and global businesses with effective means of coordinating local operations and facilitating flow of essential information and knowledge across national borders. The paper focuses on project management challenges regarding development of proprietary IT solution by a multinational facility management company – SESCOM Group. The goal of the paper is to establish inefficiencies regarding development sub-cycles of the solutions within the Agile Business Process Management Model introduced in SESCOM Group. Research incorporates Participatory Action Research (PAR) approach, providing insight into current situation of the company as depicted by all stakeholders involved in the research process at baseline analysis stage and highlights discrepancies between practice and theory.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Actuation Consulting: The study of product team performance (2013). http://www.actuationconsulting.com/whitepaper_request_2013.php
Akmanligil, M., Palvia, P.: Strategies for global information systems development. Inf. Manag. 42(1), 45–59 (2004)
Ameller, D., Ayala, C., Cabot, J., Franch, X.: Non-functional requirements in architectural decision making. IEEE Softw. 30(2), 61–67 (2012)
Baskerville, R.: Investigating information systems with action research. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 2(19), 1–32 (1999)
Bernhaupt, R., Manciet, F., Pirker, M.: User experience centered engineering: a process model inspired by games development. In: Proceedings of 15th IFIP TC.13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, INTERACT 2015 Adjunct, University of Bamberg Press (2015)
Chin, G.: Agile Project Management: How to Succeed in the Dace of Changing Project Requirements. AMACON, New York (2004)
Eden, C., Huxham, C.: Action research for management research. Br. J. Manag. 7(1), 75–86 (1996)
Farrell, D., Mendonca, L., Nevens, M., Manyika, J., Lal, S., Roberts, R., Baily, M., Terwilliger, T., Webb, A., Kale, A., Ramaratnam, M., Rzepniewski, E., Santhanam, N., Cho, M.: How IT enables productivity growth (2002). http://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/business-technology/our-insights/how-it-enables-productivity-growth
Fredriksson, O., Ljung, L.: Modern enterprise systems as enablers of Agile development. In: Song, W., Xu, S., Wan, Ch., Zhong, Y., Wojtkowski, W., Wojtkowski, G., Linger, H. (eds.) Information Systems Development. Asian Experiences. Springer-Verlag, New York (2011)
Gawin, B., Marcinkowski, B.: Do the adaptive methods of business processes management allow for achieving competitive advantage? (in Polish). E-mentor 57, 62–73 (2014)
Gotel, O.C.Z., Finklestein, A.C.W.: An analysis of the requirements traceability problem. In: Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Requirements Engineering on ICRE 1994. IEEE CS Press, Colorado Springs (1994)
Gray, K.R.: Information system development in a global environment. J. Teach. Int. Bus. 10(3–4), 113–128 (1999)
Hammar, M.: Plan-Do-Check-Act in the ISO 9001 Standard (2016). http://advisera.com/9001academy/knowledgebase/plan-do-check-act-in-the-iso-9001-standard
Hoehle, H., Venkatesh, V.: Mobile application usability: conceptualization and instrument development. MIS Q. 39(2), 435–472 (2015)
Hummel, M., Rosenkranz, C., Holten, R.: The role of social Agile practices for direct and indirect communication in information systems development teams. Commun. AIS 36, 273–300 (2015)
Hussain, W.: Requirements change management in global software development: a case study in Pakistan (2010). http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:323787/FULLTEXT01.pdf
International Data Corporation (2016). https://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS41006516
Janz, B.D., Vitalari, N.P., Wetherbe, J.C.: Emerging best practices in global systems development. In: Palvia, P., Palvia, S., Roche, E. (eds.) Global Information Technology and Electronic Commerce. Ivy League Publishing, Marietta (2002)
Katcherovski, V.: 3 Tips for managing requirement changes (2010). https://esj.com/Articles/2010/10/05/Managing-Requirement-Changes.aspx
Kerton, B.: Requirements traceability: why bother (2011). http://blog.smartbear.com/sqc/requirements-traceability-why-bother
Kiiza, B., Pederson, G.: ICT-based market information and adoption of agricultural seed technologies: insights from Uganda. Telecommun. Policy 36(4), 253–259 (2012)
Lacey, M.G.: The Scrum Field Guide: Practical Advice for Your First Year. Addison-Wesley, Upper Saddle River (2012)
Lotz, M.: Waterfall vs. Agile: which is the right development methodology for your project? (2013). http://www.seguetech.com/blog/2013/07/05/waterfall-vs-agile-right-development-methodology
Mikoluk, K.: Agile vs. Waterfall: evaluating the Pros and Cons (2013). https://www.udemy.com/blog/agile-vs-waterfall
Mirakhorli, M., Cleland-Huang, J.: Tracing non-functional requirements. In: Cleland-Huang, J., Gotel, O., Zisman, A. (eds.) Software and Systems Traceability, pp. 299–320. Springer, London (2012)
Mirbaha, M.: IT Governance in Financial Services and Manufacturing: Comparing the Two Sectors Using COBIT 4.1 as Framework. KTH Electrical Engineering, Stockholm (2008)
Mohamed, N., Kaur, J.: A conceptual framework for information technology governance effectiveness in private organizations. Inf. Manag. Comput. Secur. 20(2), 88–106 (2012)
Overhage, S., Schlauderer, S.: How sustainable are Agile methodologies? Acceptance factors and developer perceptions in Scrum Projects. In: Proceedings of ECIS 2012. Association for Information Systems (2012)
Poort, E.R., Martens, N., van de Weerd, I., van Vliet, H.: How architects see non-functional requirements: beware of modifiability. In: Regnell, B., Damian, D. (eds.) REFSQ 2011. LNCS, vol. 7195, pp. 37–51. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Quatrani, T.: The truth about Agile modeling (2010). https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/invisiblethread/entry/truthaboutagile?oldlang=en&lang=en
Scrum Alliance: Who uses Scrum and why? (2011). https://www.scrumalliance.org/why-scrum/who-uses-scrum
Slankas, J., Williams, L.: Automated extraction of non-functional requirements in available documentation. In: 2013 1st International Workshop on Natural Language Analysis in Software Engineering (NaturaLiSE), San Francisco. IEEE (2013)
Tallman, S., Fladmoe-Lindquist, K.: Internationalization, globalization, and capability-based strategy. Calif. Manag. Rev. 45(1), 116–135 (2002)
Teague, N.R.: Quality Toolbox, 2nd edn. American Society for Quality, Quality Press, Milwaukee (2005)
Trang, S., Zander, S., Kolbe, L.M.: Dimensions of trust in the acceptance of inter-organizational information systems in networks: towards a socio-technical perspective. In: Proceedings of the 18th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, Chengdu, China (2014)
Vaughan, P.J.: System implementation success factors; it’s not just the technology. In: CUMREC Conference (2001)
Verhas, P.: We do not use UML, we are Agile (2013). https://dzone.com/articles/we-do-not-use-uml-we-are-agile
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Marcinkowski, B., Gawin, B. (2016). Project Management in International IT Ventures – Does the Practice Go Hand in Hand with Theory?. In: Wrycza, S. (eds) Information Systems: Development, Research, Applications, Education. SIGSAND/PLAIS 2016. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 264. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46642-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46642-2_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-46641-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-46642-2
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)