Skip to main content

Cosmological Stability of Massive Bigravity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 702 Accesses

Part of the book series: Springer Theses ((Springer Theses))

Abstract

In the previous chapter, and in particular in Sect. 2.1, we discussed an approach to modifying gravity in which its force-carrier particle, the graviton, is given a small mass. In particular, by specialising to the dRGT interaction potentials (2.22) we ensure that the notorious Boulware-Deser ghost mode is absent, and by allowing both metrics to be dynamical and taking the graviton mass to be of the order of the present-day Hubble rate, we can obtain cosmological solutions which agree well with observations of the cosmic expansion history. These solutions are self-accelerating: the Hubble parameter goes to a constant at late times even in the absence of a cosmological constant. The action of this bimetric theory, or bigravity, is given by Eq. (2.30), and the associated modified gravitational field equations were presented as Eqs. (2.39) and (2.40).

There is nothing stable in the world; uproar’s your only music.

John Keats, Letters

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This should not be confused with the Higuchi ghost instability, which affects most massive gravity cosmologies and some in bigravity, but is, however, absent from the simplest bimetric models which produce \(\Lambda \)CDM-like backgrounds [7].

  2. 2.

    By leaving the lapse N in the g metric general, we retain the freedom to later work in cosmic or conformal time. There is a further practical benefit: since this choice makes the symmetry between the two metrics manifest, and the action is symmetric between g and f as described in Sect. 2.1.2, this means the f field equations can easily be derived from the g equations by judicious use of ctrl-f.

  3. 3.

    We thank Shinji Mukhoyama for discussions on this point.

  4. 4.

    The discussion in this section is indebted to useful conversations with Macarena Lagos and Pedro Ferreira.

  5. 5.

    Specifically, they appear without time derivatives. Recall that we are working in Fourier space where spatial derivatives effectively amount to multiplicative factors of ik.

  6. 6.

    We recognise that the number of unused synonyms for “these equations are very long” is growing short as this chapter progresses.

  7. 7.

    With the exception of the \(\beta _{0}\) model, which is simply \(\Lambda \)CDM.

  8. 8.

    We frequently discuss the viability of various models in this section; all such results were derived in Ref. [3].

  9. 9.

    We do not have the freedom to include nonzero \(\beta _2\) or \(\beta _3\); in either case the background evolution would not be viable [3]. We can see this from the expressions (2.59) and (2.60) for \(\rho (y)\) and \(H^2(y)\). If \(\beta _3\) were nonzero, then \(\Omega _{\text {m}} = \rho /(3M_{g}^{2}H^{2})\) would diverge as y at early times. Setting \(\beta _{3=0}\), we find \(\Omega _{\text {m}} \rightarrow 1-3\beta _2/\beta _{4}\) as \(y\rightarrow \infty \). If we demand a matter-dominated history, then \(\beta _2\) must at the very least be small compared to \(\beta _{4}\).

  10. 10.

    Moreover, the square root of this, \(\dot{Y}/\mathscr {H}\), appears in the mass terms. We choose branches of the square root such that this quantity starts off negative at early times and then becomes positive.

References

  1. M. von Strauss, A. Schmidt-May, J. Enander, E. Mörtsell, S. Hassan, Cosmological Solutions in Bimetric Gravity and their Observational Tests. JCAP 1203, 042 (2012). arXiv:1111.1655

  2. Y. Akrami, T.S. Koivisto, M. Sandstad, Accelerated expansion from ghost-free bigravity: a statistical analysis with improved generality. JHEP 1303, 099 (2013). arXiv:1209.0457

  3. F. Könnig, A. Patil, L. Amendola, Viable cosmological solutions in massive bimetric gravity. JCAP 1403, 029 (2014). arXiv:1312.3208

  4. D. Comelli, M. Crisostomi, L. Pilo, Perturbations in massive gravity cosmology. JHEP 1206, 085 (2012). arXiv:1202.1986

  5. A. De Felice, A.E. Gümrükçüoğlu, S. Mukohyama, N. Tanahashi, T. Tanaka, Viable cosmology in bimetric theory. JCAP 1406, 037 (2014). arXiv:1404.0008

  6. D. Comelli, M. Crisostomi, L. Pilo, FRW Cosmological perturbations in massive bigravity. Phys. Rev. D90(8), 084003 (2014). arXiv:1403.5679

  7. M. Fasiello, A.J. Tolley, Cosmological stability bound in massive gravity and bigravity. JCAP 1312, 002 (2013). arXiv:1308.1647

  8. M. Berg, I. Buchberger, J. Enander, E. Mörtsell, S. Sjörs, Growth histories in bimetric massive gravity. JCAP 1212, 021 (2012). arXiv:1206.3496

  9. F. Könnig, Y. Akrami, L. Amendola, M. Motta, A.R. Solomon, Stable and unstable cosmological models in bimetric massive gravity. Phys. Rev. D 90, 124014 (2014). arXiv:1407.4331

  10. M. Lagos, M. Bañados, P.G. Ferreira, S. García-Sáenz, Noether identities and gauge-fixing the action for cosmological perturbations. Phys. Rev. D89(2), 024034 (2014). arXiv:1311.3828

  11. M. Lagos, P.G. Ferreira, Cosmological perturbations in massive bigravity. JCAP 1412(12), 026 (2014). arXiv:1410.0207

  12. V.F. Mukhanov, H. Feldman, R.H. Brandenberger, Theory of cosmological perturbations. Part 1. Classical perturbations. Part 2. Quantum theory of perturbations. Part 3. Extensions. Phys. Rep. 215, 203–333 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. Langlois, S. Mukohyama, R. Namba, A. Naruko, Cosmology in rotation-invariant massive gravity with non-trivial fiducial metric. Class. Quantum Gravity 31, 175003 (2014). arXiv:1405.0358

  14. A.R. Solomon, Y. Akrami, T.S. Koivisto, Linear growth of structure in massive bigravity. JCAP 1410, 066 (2014). arXiv:1404.4061

  15. A. Vainshtein, To the problem of nonvanishing gravitation mass. Phys. Lett. B 39, 393–394 (1972)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. E. Babichev, C. Deffayet, An introduction to the Vainshtein mechanism. Class. Quantum Gravity 30, 184001 (2013). arXiv:1304.7240

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam Ross Solomon .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Solomon, A.R. (2017). Cosmological Stability of Massive Bigravity. In: Cosmology Beyond Einstein. Springer Theses. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46621-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics