Abstract
Methods of monitoring spinal cord function during surgeries are described. In addition to somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEPs) from the scalp by peripheral nerve stimulation and motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in response to transcranial electric or magnetic stimulations, direct recording of spinal cord potentials (SCPs) from the epidural space could contribute to more precise monitoring of spinal cord function in cases such as surgeries of the spine or spinal cord, and cardiovascular surgeries which may cause spinal cord ischemia. Monitoring the SCPs by segmental peripheral nerve stimulation (segmental SCPs), by spinal cord simulation from the epidural space (conductive SCPs), or by transcranial electric or magnetic simulations (transcranial SCPs), may also be useful for monitoring of spinal cord function in a certain case. Multiple recordings and stimulations along the somatosensory or motor tracts may be useful for accurate monitoring of nervous system function during surgeries according to the types of operative manipulations.
Keywords
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Hicks JM, Singla A, Shen FH, Arlet V. Complications of pedicle screw fixation in scoliosis surgery: a systematic review. Spine. 2010;35:E465–70.
Mel MW, Wynn MM, Reeder SB, Tefera G, Hoch JR, Acher CW. A new intercostal artery management strategy for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Surg Res. 2009;154:99–104.
Ikuta T, Furuta N, Kihara S, Okura M, Nagamine I, Nakayama H, et al. Differences in waveforms of cerebral evoked potentials among healthy subjects, schizophrenics, manic-depressives and epileptics. J Med Invest. 2007;54:303–15.
Vodusek DB. Interventional neurophysiology of the sacral nervous system. Neurophysiol Clin. 2001;31:239–46.
Grundy EL, Nash Jr CL, Brown RH. Arterial pressure manipulation alters spinal cord function during correction of scoliosis. Anesthesiology. 1981;54:249–53.
Carenini L, Botacchi E, Camerlingo M, Mamoli A. Considerations after intraoperative monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials during carotid endarterectomy. Ital J Neurol Sci. 1989;10:315–20.
Takada T, Denda S, Baba H, Fujioka H, Yamakura T, Fujihara H, et al. Somatosensory evoked potentials recorded from the posterior pharynx to stimulation of the median nerve and cauda equina. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1996;100:493–9.
Shimoji K, Higashi H, Kano T. Epidural recording of spinal electrogram in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1971;30:236–9.
Shimoji K. Origins and properties of spinal cord evoked potentials. In: Dimitrijevic MR, Halter JA, editors. Atlas of human spinal cord potentials. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1995.
Aida S, Shimoji K. Descending pathways in spinal cord stimulation and pain control. In: Bountra C, Munglani R, Schmidt WK, editors. Pain: current understanding, emerging therapies, and novel approaches to drug discovery. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2003. p. 101–17.
Shimoji K, Kitamura H, Ikezono E, Shimizu H, Okamoto K, Iwakura Y. Spinal hypalgesia and analgesia by low-frequency electrical stimulation in the epidural space. Anesthesiology. 1974;41:91–4.
Magladery LW, Porter WE, Park AM, Teasdal RD. Electroencephalogical studies of nerve reflex activity in normal man. IV. The two-neuron reflex and identification of certain action potentials from spinal roots and cord. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp. 1951;88:499–519.
Fujioka H, Shimoji K, Tomita M, Denda S, Hokari T, Tohyama M. Effects of dorsal root entry zone lesion on spinal cord potentials evoked by segmental, ascending and descending volleys. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1992;117:135–42.
Shimoji K, Matsuki M, Shimizu H. Wave-form characteristic and special distribution of evoked spinal electrogram in man. J Neurosurg. 1977;46:304–13.
Fukaya C, Katayama Y. Spinal cord tumor. In: Shimoji K, Willis Jr WD, editors. Evoked spinal cord potentials. Tokyo: Springer; 2006. p. 143–9.
Becske T, Nelson PK. The vascular anatomy of the vertebro-spinal axis. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2009;20:259–64.
de Haan P, Kalkman CJ, de Mol BA, Ubags LH, Veldman DJ, Jacobs MJ. Efficacy of transcranial motor-evoked myogenic potentials to detect spinal cord ischemia during operations for thoracoabdominal aneurysms. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997;113:87–100.
Tobita T, Denda S, Takada T, Endoh H, Baba H, Yamakura T, et al. Effects of fentanyl on spinal cord potentials and electromyogram evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation in man. In: Hashimoto I, Kakigi R, editors. Recent advances in human neurophysiology. Amsterdam: Excepta Medica; 1998. p. 1034–7.
Ubags LH, Kalkman CJ, Been HD, Koelman JH, Ongerboer de Visser BW. A comparison of myogenic motor evoked responses to electrical and magnetic transcranial stimulation during nitrous oxide/opioid anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1999;88:568–72.
Tomita M, Shimoji K, Denda S, Tobita T, Uchiyama S, Baba H. Spinal tracts producing slow components of spinal cord potentials evoked by descending volleys in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1996;100:68–73.
Shimoji K, Matsuki M, Ito Y, Masuko K, Maruyama M, Iwane T, et al. Interactions of cord dorsum potential. J Appl Physiol. 1976;40:79–84.
Shimizu H, Shimoji K, Maruyama Y, Matsuki M, Kuribayashi H, Fujioka H. Human spinal cord potentials produced in lumbosacral enlargement by descending volleys. J Neurophysiol. 1982;48:1108–20.
Maruyama Y, Shimoji K, Shimizu H, Kuribayashi H, Fujioka H. Human spinal cord potentials evoked by different sources of stimulation and conduction velocities along the cord. J Neurophysiol. 1982;48:1098–107.
Kawanishi Y, Munakata H, Matsumori M, Tanaka H, Yamashita T, Nakagiri K, et al. Usefulness of transcranial motor evoked potentials during thoracoabdominal aortic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83:456–61.
Kawaguchi M, Sakamoto T, Inoue S, Kakimoto M, Furuya H, Morimoto T, et al. Low dose propofol as a supplement to ketamine-based anesthesia during intraoperative monitoring of motor-evoked potentials. Spine. 2000;25:974–9.
Chaudhary K, Speights K, McGuire K, White AP. Trans-cranial motor evoked potential detection of femoral nerve injury in trans-psoas lateral lumbar interbody fusion. J Clin Monit Comput. 2015;29(5):549–54.
Ellen R. Grass Lecture: motor evoked potential monitoring. Am J Electroneurodiagnostic Technol. 2004;4:223–43.
Novak K, de Camargo AB, Neuwirth M, Kothbauer K, Amassian VE, Deletis V. The refractory period of fast conducting corticospinal tract axons in man and its implications for intraoperative monitoring of motor evoked potentials. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004;115:1931–41.
Deletis V, Sala F. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring of the spinal cord during spinal cord and spine surgery: a review focus on the corticospinal tracts. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008;119:248–64.
Tobita T, Shimoji K. Transcranial magnetically evoked SCPs [TCM-Evoked SCPs]. In: Shimoji K, Willis WD, editors. Evoked spinal cord potentials. Tokyo: Springer; 2006. p. 105–11.
Di Lazzaro V, Thickbroom GW, Pilato F, Profice P, Dileone M, Mazzone P, et al. Direct demonstration of the effects of repetitive paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation at I-wave periodicity. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007;118:1193–7.
Davis SF, Altstadt T, Flores R, Kaye A, Oremus G. Report of seizure following intraoperative monitoring of transcranial motor evoked potentials. Ochsner J. 2013;13:558–60.
MacDonald DB. Safety of intraoperative transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potential monitoring. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2002;19:416–29.
Legat AD. Current practice of motor evoked potential monitoring: results of a survey. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2002;19:454–60.
Cheng JS, Ivan ME, Stapleton CJ, Quinones-Hinojosa A, Gupta N, Auguste KI. Intraoperative changes in transcranial motor evoked potentials and somatosensory evoked potentials predicting outcome in children with intramedullary spinal cord tumors. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2014;13:591–9.
Shimoji K, Kano T, Nakashima H, Shimizu H. The effects of thiamylal sodium on electrical activities of the central and peripheral nervous systems in man. Anesthesiology. 1974;40:234–40.
Tobita T, Okamoto M, Shimizu M, Yamakura T, Fujihara H, Shimoji K, Baba H. The effects of isoflurane on conditioned inhibition by dorsal column stimulation. Anesth Analg. 2003;97:436–41.
Kohno T, Kumamoto E, Baba H, Ataka T, Okamoto M, Shimoji K, Yoshimura M. Actions of midazolam on GABAergic transmission in substantia gelatinosa neurons of adult rat spinal cord slices. Anesthesiology. 2000;92:507–15.
Shimoji K, Fujiwara N, Fukuda S, Denda S, Takada T, Maruyama Y. Effects of isoflurane on spinal inhibitory potentials. Anesthesiology. 1990;72:851–7.
Kano T, Shimoji K. The effects of ketamine and neuroleptanalgesia on the evoked electrospinogram and electromyogram in man. Anesthesiology. 1974;40:241–6.
Scheufler K-M, Zentner J. Total intravenous anesthesia for intraoperative monitoring of the motor pathways: an integral view combining clinical and experimental data. J Neurosurg. 2002;96:571–9.
Johanscn JW, Sebcl PS. Development and clinical application of electroencephalographic bispectrum monitoring. Anesthesiology. 2000;93:1336–44.
Criou A, Monchi M, Joly LM, Bellenfant F, Claessens YE, Thébert D, et al. Noninvasive cardiac output monitoring by aortic blood flow determination: evaluation of the Sometec Dynamo-3000 system. Crit Care Med. 1998;26:2066–72.
Kakinohana M, Nakamura S, Fuchigami T, Miyata Y, Sugahara K. Influence of the descending thoracic aortic cross clamping on bispectral index value and plasma propofol concentration in humans. Anesthesiology. 2006;104:939–43.
Dahaba AA. Different conditions that could results in the bispectral index indicating an incorrect hypnotic state. Anesth Analg. 2006;101:765–73.
Fujioka H, Shimoji K, Tomita M, Denda S, Takada H, Homa T, et al. Spinal cord potential recordings from the extradural space during scoliosis surgery. Br J Anaesth. 1994;73:350–6.
Piñeiro AM, Cubells C, Garcia P, Castaño GC, Dávalos A, Coll-Cantia J. Implementation of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during endovascular procedures in the central nervous system. Interv Neurol. 2015;3:85–100.
Kim ST, Paeng SH, Jeong DM, Lee KS. Usefulness of intraoperative monitoring during microsurgical decompression of cervicomedullary compression caused by an anomalous vertebral artery. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2014;56:513–6.
Kondo K, Harada H, Kaneko S, Tyama K, Kano T. Intraoperative monitoring of the conductive evoked spinal cord potentials under deep hypothermia. J Electrodiag Spinal Cord. 1996;18:160–2.
Costa P, Peretta P, Faccani G. Relevance of intraoperative D wave in spine and spinal cord surgeries. Eur Spine J. 2013;22:840–8.
Kim SM, Eur Kim SH, Seo DW, Lee KW. Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring: basic principles and recent update. J Korean Med Sci. 2013;28:1261–9.
Pastorelli F, Di Silvestre M, Plasmati R, Michelucci R, Greggi T, Morigi A, et al. The prevention of neural complications in the surgical treatment of scoliosis: the role of the neurophysiological intraoperative monitoring. Eur Spine J. 2011;20 Suppl 1:S105–14.
Shimoji K, Higashi H, Kano T, Asai S, Morioka T. Electrical management of intractable pain. Masui (Jpn J Anesthesiol). 1971;20:44–7.
Shimoji K, Matsuki M, Shimizu H, Iwane T, Takahashi R, Maruyama M, Masuko K. Low-frequency, weak extradural stimulation in the management of intractable pain. Br J Anaesth. 1977;49:1081–6.
Shimoji K, Fujiwara N, Sato Y. Development of the system and electrode for simultaneous measurements of regional blood flow, oxygen pressure and electrical activity [in Japanese]. Byotai Seiri. 1986;11:876–80.
Kano T, Shimoji K. Influence of anesthesia on intraoperative monitoring of SCEPs. In: Dimitrijevic MR, Halter JA, editors. Atlas of human spinal cord evoked potentials. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1995. p. 97–106.
Hayatsu K, Tomita M, Fujihara H, Baba H, Yamakura T, Taga K, et al. The placement of the epidural catheter at the predicted site by electrical stimulation test. Anesth Analg. 2001;93:1035–9.
Denda S, Shimoji K, Tomita M, Baba H, Yamakura T, Masaki H, et al. Central nuclei and spinal pathways in feedback inhibitory spinal cord potentials in ketamine-anaesthetized rats. Br J Anaesth. 1996;76:258–65.
Shimoji K, Sato Y, Denda S, Takada T, Fukuda S, Hokari T. Slow positive dorsal cord potentials activated by heterosegmental stimuli. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1992;85:72–80.
Shimoji K, Fujiwara N, Denda S, Tomita M, Toyama M, Fukuda S. Effects of pentobarbital on heterosegmentally activated dorsal root depolarization in the rat. Investigation by sucrose-gap technique in vivo. Anesthesiology. 1992;76:958–66.
Shimoji K, Tomita M, Tobita T, Baba H, Takada T, Fukuda S, et al. Erb’s point stimulation produces slow positive potentials in the human lumbar spinal cord. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1994;11:365–74.
Shimoji K. Overviews of human (evoked) spinal cord potentials (SCPs): recording methods and terminology. In: Shimoji K, Willis Jr WD, editors. Evoked spinal cord potentials—an illustrated guide to physiology, pharmacology, and recording techniques. Tokyo: Springer; 2006. p. 40–9.
Yates BJ, Thompson FJ, Mickle JP. Origin and properties of spinal cord field potentials. Neurosurgery. 1982;11:439–50.
Besson JM, Rivot JP. Spinal interneurones involved in presynaptic controls of supraspinal origin. J Physiol. 1973;230:235–54.
Schmidt RF. Presynaptic inhibition in the vertebrate central nervous system. Ergeb Physiol. 1971;63:20–101.
Beal JE, Applebaum AE, Forman RD, Willis WD. Spinal cord potentials evoked by cutaneous afferents in the monkey. J Neurophysiol. 1977;40:199–211.
Shimoji K, Kano T, Higashi H, Morioka T, Henschel EO. Evoked spinal electrograms recorded from epidural space in man. J Appl Physiol. 1972;33:468–71.
Tanaka E, Tobita T, Murai Y, Okabe Y, Yamada A, Kano T, et al. Thiamylal antagonizes the inhibitory effects of dorsal column stimulation on dorsal horn activities in humans. Neurosci Res. 2009;64:391–6.
Bernhard DG. The spinal cord potentials in leads from the cord dorsum in relation to peripheral source of afferent stimulation. Acta Physiol Scand. 1953;29 Suppl 106:1–29.
Eccles JC, Schmidt R, Willis WD. Pharmacological studies on presynaptic inhibition. J Physiol. 1963;168:500–30.
Shimoji K, Ito Y, Ohama K, Sawa T, Ikezono E. Presynaptic inhibition in man during anesthesia and sleep. Anesthesiology. 1975;43:388–91.
Maruyama Y, Shimoji K, Shimizu H, Sato Y, Kuribayashi H, Kaieda R. Effects of morphine of human spinal cord and peripheral nervous activities. Pain. 1980;8:63–73.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix: Techniques and Physiology
Appendix: Techniques and Physiology
Introduction
The development of the catheter electrode has made it possible to stimulate the spinal cord from the epidural space for pain management [53] and to record epidurally human spinal cord potentials for monitoring spinal cord function during an operation [8].
The Catheter Electrodes
Human spinal cord potentials (SCPs) can be recorded from the epidural space using the same catheter used for continuous epidural block. The epidural catheter electrode can be made simply by insertion of a stainless steel wire through the epidural catheter approximately 5 mm beyond its tip (Fig. A6.1a). This simple catheter has been used for the recording of spinal cord potentials in patients during surgical operations or for the stimulation of the spinal cord in patients with various spinal cord diseases [54]. An epidural catheter with three orifices on the side and three platinum wire electrodes was developed in our laboratory for multiple applications (Fig. A6.1b, c), including monitoring of spinal cord potentials, measurement of epidural pressure and epidural tissue blood flow, epidural spinal cord stimulation, and epidural injection of drugs [55].
Accurate insertion of the catheter electrode at the required site in the epidural space is critical for these applications. We have been using three methods to determine the proper placement of the catheter electrodes in the posterior epidural space: (1) epidural electrical stimulation test, (2) recording of the spinal cord potentials evoked by stimulation of the segmental, heterosegmental nerves, or dorsal cord [14, 56, 57], and (3) image examination such as X-ray, MRI, or CT scan.
When the catheter electrodes are situated in the posterior epidural space on the mid-line, stimulation through the catheter electrodes produces the bilateral twitches of the segmental muscles. When it produces unilateral muscle twitches in the same spinal segment, the electrodes might be situated laterally in the epidural space. By this stimulation test, you can verify the spinal segment position and the laterality of the catheter electrode in the epidural space. When the catheter electrode is situated in the anterior epidural space, the polarity of the segmental SCPs is reversed as expected. Laterality of the catheter electrodes in the epidural space can also be determined by the waveform characteristics of the SCPs. When the catheter electrodes are situated ipsilateral to the stimulated peripheral nerves and close to the roots, the recorded initial positive spikes and P2 wave are larger than those recorded contralateral to the nerves.
The procedure used to introduce the catheter electrodes into the epidural space is the same as that used to place catheters for continuous epidural anesthesia [53]. The patients are placed in the lateral position and flexed to open the interspaces of the vertebral column. After making a skin wheal aseptically and injecting 0.5–1.0 % lidocaine (5 mL), a 16- to 18-gauge Tuohy needle is inserted into the epidural space using the paramedian approach, with the bevel parallel to the sagittal plane and targeting the predicted segment. When the tip of the Tuohy needle is located in the epidural space, the direction of the bevel is adjusted, and the catheter electrode is inserted approximately 5 cm into the epidural space. The tip of the catheter electrode and the skin surface electrode are connected, respectively, to the negative and positive outlets of an electrical nerve stimulator [57]. Using these electrodes, recordings can be made at several spinal levels (Fig. A6.2).
Origins of Each Component of the Segmental SCPs
The initially positive spike, P1, of the segmental SCPs is believed to be a reflection of the extracellular events associated with the action potential propagation through the roots into the spinal cord [14, 58–62]. The generation of an action potential at a node of Ranvier creates a positive capacitive current, which is conducted electronically down the axon and the nearby tissues. This current is responsible for the initial positivity of the triphasic spikes (Fig. A6.3a). The capacitative current is also responsible for depolarizing the cell membrane at the next node to threshold, thereby initiating the production of an action potential here. The rising phase of the action potential is generated by an influx of Na + into the axon from the extracellular space. The loss of Na + causes the extracellular space to become negatively charged; this event is recorded as the negative component of the triphasic spikes (Fig. A6.3b). The falling phase of an action potential is caused by a K+ efflux from the axon into the extracellular space. The additional positivity in the extracellular space is recorded from the cord dorsum as the second positive component of the triphasic spikes (Fig. A6.3b) [63].
In addition, heterosegmental nerve stimulations also produce a slow positive potential (heterosegmental slow positive [HSP] wave) in cervical and lumbar enlargements in animal [58, 60, 61, 64] and man during wakeful state [61].
The negative waves, N1, of the segmental SCPs (Fig. A6.3c) are thought to be reflections of changes in the extracellular environment produced by activity of dorsal horn interneurons (see also Fig. A6.4). When the interneurons are synaptically activated, positive ionic current leaves the extracellular space at the synapses (sinks) and reappears along the ventrally projecting axons of the cells (sources). Thus, the dorsal horn takes on a negative charge and the ventral horn takes on a positive charge [62, 65, 66].
The slow positive wave, P2, of the segmental SCPs (Fig. A6.4d) has been demonstrated as the extracellular manifestation of the process of primary afferent depolarization (PAD) just as observed in the spinal animals (Fig. A6.4) [14, 65, 66]. Positive ionic current leaves the extracellular space at excited axo-axonal synapses (sinks) and reappears along the primary afferents (sources). Thus, the dorsal most portion of the spinal cord becomes positively charged (Fig. A6.3d) [21, 23, 67–72]. Another component, inhibitory postsynaptic potential (IPSP), might be involved in the P2 wave [68, 69].
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Aida, S., Kohno, T., Shimoji, K. (2017). Monitoring of Spinal Cord Functions. In: Koht, A., Sloan, T., Toleikis, J. (eds) Monitoring the Nervous System for Anesthesiologists and Other Health Care Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46542-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46542-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-46540-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-46542-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)