Abstract
Indonesia ratified the Cape Town Convention 2001 and Aircraft Protocol on 2007 by Presidential Decree No.8 in 2007. Indonesia submitted the declaration when it ratified the convention, namely Opt In, Opt Out and Mandatory Declaration, which stipulate on Article 39 and 40 of the convention. In implementing the convention, Indonesia regulates the international interest of the Cape Town Convention in one Chapter of the Aviation Law No. 1 in 2009 and a number of technical regulations. The Cape Town 2001 not only provides for rules of Aviation or Air Law, but also bankruptcy, Civil Law and Private International Law. Based on that condition, especially to implement Cape Town Convention 2001 completely, Indonesia needs to review a number of laws which are related to Cape Town Convention 2001.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
The Cape Town Convention 2001 in this article means the Cape Town Convention 2001 regarding Security Interest on Mobile Equipment and the Aircraft Protocol that Indonesia ratified by a single instrument, Presidential Decree No.8/2007.
- 2.
Vienna Convention 1969.
- 3.
Article 47 (2) Cape Town Convention 2001 “This Convention shall be subject to ratification, acceptance or approval by states which have signed it”.
- 4.
Article 26 Vienna Convention 1969 “Every Treaty in force is binding upon the parties and must be performed by them in good faith”.
- 5.
Consideration of the Presidential Decree No. 8/2007.
- 6.
Goode, Roy, Official Commentary on The Convention on International Interest in Mobile Equipment and the Protocol thereto on Matters specific to Aircraft Equipment, UNIDROIT, p.29.
- 7.
Annex of the Presidential Decree No. 8/2007.
- 8.
Article 39 (1) (b) “that nothing in this Convention shall affect the right of a State or State entity, intergovernmental organization or other private provider of public services to arrest or detain an object under the laws of that State for payment of amounts owed to such entity, organization or provider directly relating to those services in respect of that object or another object”.
- 9.
Annex of the Presidential Decree No. 8/2007.
- 10.
Article 40“A Contracting State may at any time in a declaration deposited with the Depositary of the Protocol list the categories of non-consensual right or interest which shall be registrable under this Convention as regards any category of object as if the right or interest were an international interest and shall be regulated accordingly. Such a declaration may be modified from time to time.”
- 11.
Article 53 “A Contracting State may, at the time of ratification, acceptance, approval of, or accession to the Protocol, declare the relevant “court” or “courts” for the purposes of Article 1 and Chapter XII of this Convention.” This declaration give an authority to Contracting States to submit declaration regarding jurisdiction of the court based on Convention. But this not include privat court or administrative court. Roy, Official Commentary…..P.159.
- 12.
Article 54 “A Contracting State shall, at the time of ratification, acceptance, approval of, or accession to the Protocol, declare whether or not any remedy available to the creditor under any provision of this Convention which is not there expressed to require application to the court may be exercised only with leave of the court”.
- 13.
Annex of Presidential Decree No.8/2007.
- 14.
Kamran Radjab Lossen, Yurisdiksi Negara atas Pendaftaran Nasionalitas Pesawat Udara Leasing Transnasional dalam mendukung Industri Penerbangan Indonesia, Dissertation, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, 2008, p. 262–267.
- 15.
Explanation chapter of Aviation Law No.1/2009.
- 16.
Article 17 Chicago Convention 1944.
- 17.
The Formation of Regulation Law of Indonesia No. 12 in 2011.
- 18.
Hikmahanto Juwana, “Kewajiban Negara Mentransformasikan ketentuan Perjanjian Internasional kedalam Peraturan perundang-undangan: Studi Kasus Pasca Keikutsertaan dalam Cape Town Convention 2001”, Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, Vol 28 No. 4 Tahun 2009, P. 56.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Amalia, P. (2017). Indonesia’s Report: The Implementation of The Cape Town Convention 2001 . In: Kozuka, S. (eds) Implementing the Cape Town Convention and the Domestic Laws on Secured Transactions. Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law, vol 22. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46470-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46470-1_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-46468-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-46470-1
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)