Abstract
The subject of this book concerns the (possible) impact on national law of a uniform law instrument developed by an inter-governmental organization, the International Institute for the Unification of Private Law (Unidroit). The International Academy of Comparative Law had already specifically addressed other Unidroit’s instruments in past congresses. The 2014 session from which this volume arose focused in particular on the Cape Town Convention on International Interests on Mobile Equipment and the Protocols thereto (relating to aircraft, railway-rolling stock and space assets).
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Regarding international contracts see the General Report by Michael Joachim Bonell in Bonell, MJ (ed), A New Approach in International Commercial Contracts. The UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts (Kluwer Law Int, 1999); in the field of asset-based financing see the General Report by Herbert Kronke: Kronke, H, Financial Leasing and its Unification by Unidroit, (2011) Unif L Rev 23.
- 2.
2001 Convention on International Interests in Mobile Equipment, available at http://www.unidroit.org/instruments/securityinterests/cape-town-convention. From now on “Cape Town Convention” or “Convention”.
- 3.
2001 Protocol to the Convention on International Interests in Mobile Equipment on Matters Specific to Aircraft Equipment, available at http://www.unidroit.org/instruments/securityinterests/aircraft-protocol. From now on “Aircraft Protocol”.
- 4.
2007 Luxembourg (Rail) Protocol to the Convention on International Interests in Mobile Equipment on Matters Specific to Railway Rolling Stock, available at http://www.unidroit.org/instruments/securityinterests/rail-protocol. From now on: “Rail Protocol”.
- 5.
2012 Protocol to the Convention on International Interests in Mobile Equipment on Matters Specific to Space Assets, at http://www.unidroit.org/instruments/securityinterests/space-protocol. From now on: “Space Protocol”.
- 6.
Ranging from instrument intending to become legally binding such as Cape Town Convention and its Protocols, to soft law products such as the 2010 Legislative Guide on Secured Transactions (and its 2012 Supplement on Electronic Registries) by the UN Commission on International Trade Law UNCITRAL (a legislative guide discussing policy issues and containing recommendations with the aim of paving the way to domestic law reforms), or the recently approved UNCITRAL Model Law. Other instruments at global level have specifically addressed security rights in the capital markets: 2006 Hague Convention on the Law Applicable to Certain Rights in Respect of Securities Held with an Intermediary; 2009 Unidroit (Geneva) Convention on Substantive Rules for Intermediated Securities. See Goode R, Kronke H, McKendrick E, Transnational Commercial Law. Text, Cases and Materials (2nd ed., OUP, 2015), 432; 453.
- 7.
One of the most interesting achievements at a regional level was the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) Model Law on Secured Transactions, originally published in 1994 and aimed at facilitating the transition to capital market economies and the introduction of efficient systems of security rights over movables in Central and Eastern European countries. Other regional bodies have recently developed model laws in this field: as an example see the 2002 Organization of American States (OAS) Model Inter-American Law on Secured Transactions. Finally, whilst the European Union has limited its legislative intervention to the financial markets with the 2002 Financial Collateral Directive (expanded in 2009), an entire book of the Draft Common Frame of Reference project was dedicated to ‘Proprietary security in movable assets’ (Book IX, in von Bar, Ch, Clive, E (eds.), Principles, Definitions and Model Rules of European Private Law, Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR), Vol. 6 (Full ed., Sellier, 2009) 5389.
- 8.
In the relatively short time since the July 2014 IACL Congress, twelve additional States have ratified or otherwise accessed to the Convention, for a total of 72 States; the contracting States to the Aircraft Protocol are 65, the Aircraft Protocol being the only one that entered into force so far, triggering the effects of the Convention (data checked up to 3 October 2016). This is a staggering number in view of the recent adoption of the two instruments and is steadily increasing every year. The European Community/European Union has also approved the Convention and the Aircraft Protocol, and end of 2014 the Rail Protocol, in its capacity as a Regional Economic Integration Organisation (REIO. Most recently, the Rail Protocol (already ratified by Luxemburg and signed by four other States including Italy) has been signed by the United Kingdom with a view towards ratification.
- 9.
The International Registry, operated by Aviareto, a joint venture between the private company SITA SC and the Irish Government, appointed and supervised by the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO), that adopted the Convention and the Aircraft Protocol jointly with Unidroit, has received more than 700,000 entries since the beginning of its activity in 2006.
- 10.
See for all: Drobnig U, Security Rights in Movables, in Hartkamp, AS, Hesselink, MW et al. (eds.) Towards a European Civil Code (4th ed., Wolters Kluwer, 2010), Chapter 43, 1025; Kieninger, E-M (ed.) Security Rights in Movable Property in European Private Law (CUP, 2009); Beale H, Bridge M, Gullifer L, Lomnika E, The Law of Security and Title-Based Financing, (2nd ed., OUP, 2012).
- 11.
See Cuming, RCC, International Regulation of Aspects of Security Interests in Mobile Equipment, (1991) Unif L Rev 75; Goode, R, Transcending the Boundaries of Earth and Space: the Preliminary Draft Unidroit Convention on International Interests in Mobile Equipment, (1998) Unif L Rev 52.
- 12.
Italy is among the ten States that have adhered to the 1988 UNIDROIT Convention on International Financial Leasing (Ottawa Convention), which represented a – very limited – first step in the direction of cross-border recognition of leasing on equipment and as such, opened the path to the work on the future Cape Town Convention (see above, fn 1).
- 13.
Security rights over movables and immovables were the topic of an earlier Italian national report to the International Academy: see Bussani, M, Le présent et l’avenir des sûretés réelles, in Rapports nationaux italien/Italian National Reports, XVI International Congress of Comparative Law, Brisbane 2002 (Milano, Giuffrè, 2002) 245.
- 14.
See among others (in English and French): Tucci, G, Towards a Transnational Commercial Law for Secured Transactions: the Preliminary Draft UNIDROIT Convention and Italian Law, (1999) Unif L Rev 371; Ferrarini, G, Changes to personal property security law in Italy: a comparative and functional approach, in Cranston, R (ed.), Making Commercial Law. Essays in Honour of R.M. Goode (OUP, 1997) 477; Bussani, M, Rapport italien, in Les garanties de financement, Travaux de l’Association Henri Capitant (LGDJ, Paris, 1998) Vol. XLVII, 213.; Veneziano, A, Italy, in Sigman, HC and Kieninger, E-M (eds), Cross-Border Security over Tangibles (Sellier, 2007), 159; Italian Report by Graziadei, M and Candian, Alb, in Kieninger, E-M (ed.) (above, fn 10).
- 15.
A first attempt was made through one provision contained in a proposal to delegate to the Government the legislative power to introduce reforms towards, inter alia, the reoganisation of secured transactions law, presented to the Parliament on 12.2.2014 but never approved. This provision recently resurfaced in another legislative proposal aimed at reforming insolvency law and approved by the Council of Ministers on 12.2.2016 not yet approved by Parliament; Finally, a parallel legislative initiative was approved when this book was in its final stages of editing and will be only mentioned here: a new registered non-possessory pledge for enterprises was introduced by way of Governmental Decree (3 May 2016, No. 59). The new pledge is not yet operational since it awaits secondary legislation on the setting up of the centralised, fully electronic registry. It excludes, however, from its scope of application “registered mobile assets” such as aircraft.
- 16.
Art. 2740 (1) Italian Civil Code.
- 17.
See Tucci, G, Garanzia, in Digesto IV, Discipline privatistiche, sez.civ., Vol. VII (Torino, Utet, 1991) 579.
- 18.
On the pledge in Italian law and its recent developments see among others Gabrielli, E, I diritti reali, Vol. 5, Il pegno, in Trattato di diritto civile directed by R Sacco (Torino, UTET, 2005); Mastropaolo, F, De Vecchis, P and Mastropaolo, EM, in Mastropaolo, F (ed.), I contratti di garanzia, 1, Trattato dei contratti directed by P Rescigno and E Gabrielli (Torino, UTET, 2006), 1192; Fiorentini, F, Il pegno, in Gambaro, A and Morello, U (eds), Trattato dei diritti reali, Vol. V, Diritti reali di garanzia (Milano, Giuffrè, 2014) 1 (with a comparative introduction).
- 19.
See Gabrielli, E, Delle garanzie rotative (Napoli, Jovene, 1998).
- 20.
See for example the provisions on ‘dedicated assets’ (patrimoni destinati) introduced in the Civil code, in conjunction with the Insolvency Law (Art. 2447 bis-decies Civil Code and Art. 72-ter Royal Decree 16 March 1942, No. 267 (Insolvency Law), as amended). This device does not, however, constitute an encumbrance over the equipment itself but on the “returns” of the economic venture.
- 21.
Cf. Art. 565 Italian Maritime Code (mortgage over ships); Art. 1027 Italian Maritime Code (mortgage over aircrafts); r.d.l. 15.3.1927, No. 436, implemented by Law 19.2.1928, No. 510, and Art. 2810 Italian Civil Code (consensual lien (that is, a mortgage) over motor-vehicles). See Lefebvre D’Ovidio, A, Pescatore, G, Tullio, L, Manuale di diritto della navigazione (13th ed., Milano, Giuffrè, 2013) 723 et seq.; Chianale, A, L’ipoteca, Trattato di diritto civile diretto da R. Sacco, I diritti reali, Vol. 6 (2nd ed., Torino, UTET, 2010) 142, 189.
- 22.
See Deschamps, M, The perfection and priority rules of the Cape Town Convention and the Aircraft Protocol- A comparative law analysis, (2013) Cape Town Convention Journal, 51, at 53, available at http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/hart/ctcj/2013/00002013/00000001/art00004.
- 23.
Arts 8 and 9 Conv.; Art. IX Aircraft Prot. See also below, para. 4.3.
- 24.
Art. 10 Conv. The Aircraft Protocol extends the obligation to exercise any remedy in a commercially reasonable manner to sellers and lessors. See below, para. 4.3.
- 25.
Goode, R, Convention on International Interests in Mobile Equipment and Protocol Thereto on Matters Specific to Aircraft Equipment, Official Commentary (3rd ed., Rome, Unidroit, 2013) 45.
- 26.
See above, fn. 14.
- 27.
The term ‘notice’ filing as opposed to ‘transaction’ or ‘transactional’ filing, originally specific to the US UCC Article 9 model, is now widely used in scholarship and international instruments on secured transactions and was even adopted by Book IX of the Draft Common Frame of Reference.
- 28.
Goode, R, Official Commentary (above fn. 25), 44.
- 29.
Goode, R, Official Commentary, (above fn. 25) 67.
- 30.
This requirement was later simplified by allowing also a mere ‘registration’ of a written document by other competent authorities, cf. Law No. 248/2006.
- 31.
The charge must be create by a written document ‘exactly describing’ (1) the collateral; (2) names of lender and debtor or third party provider of security; (3) amount of the loan and its terms; (4) sum secured.
- 32.
Veneziano, A, Italy (above fn. 14), 172.
- 33.
With the exception of assets that are registered in public registries.
- 34.
Art. 1524 (2) Civil Code: € 15,49 – the amount has never been adjusted to the decrease in value of the nominal sum in Italian old lire. Furthermore, in the case of equipment exceeding the value of € 258,23 an additional requirement of a marking – a plate containing the seller’s name and its property right in the machine as well as particulars concerning the machine – is provided for by special legislation, but again only to protect the title-retaining seller from sub-buyers.
- 35.
This is the resulting regulation after the implementation of the 35/2000/EC Late Payment Directive (Legislative Decree No. 231/2002, Art. 11 (3)) and the decision of the European Court of Justice 26 Oct 2006, Commission v. Italy, C-302/05, according to which Italy did not fail to implement the Directive by providing for additional acts of the part of the seller in order for the title retention to be opposable to the buyer’s creditors).
- 36.
For this comment and a review of what could be the abstractly possible solutions as to the relative priorities see Veneziano, A, Italy (above, fn. 14), 173.
- 37.
Arts 8–15 Conv. And IX–XIII Aircraft Prot. On the following see Goode, R, Official Commentary (above, fn. 25), 51; Wool, J, Treaty Design, Implementation and Compliance Benchmarking Economic Benefit - a Framework as Applied to the Cape Town Convention,(2012) Unif L Rev633.
- 38.
According to the Aircraft Protocol, furthermore, all creditors may ask for deregistration of the aircraft and export or physical transfer of an aircraft object (Art. IX Aircraft Prot.).
- 39.
A remedy is deemed to be exercised in a commercially reasonable manner if exercised in conformity with the provisions of the agreement, except where such provision is manifestly unreasonable (Art. IX (3) Aircraft Prot.).
- 40.
Art. 13 Conv.; Art. X Aircraft Prot.; see also Art. VIII Rail Prot.; Art. XX Space Prot.
- 41.
The creditor should adduce evidence of default; the debtor has to have agreed to the relief at any time: Art.13 (1) Conv.
- 42.
Art. 13 lists the following orders: (a) preservation of the object and its value; possession, control or custody of the object; (c) immobilisation of the object; (d) lease or, except when covered by (a) to (c), management of the object and the income therefrom. The Aircraft Protocol adds the possibility of asking the court to sell the collateral and apply its proceeds to the creditor’s satisfaction.
- 43.
Art. X (2) and (5) Aircraft Prot.
- 44.
See Art. 1055 et seq. Maritime Code. Righetti, G, Ipoteca navale ed aeronautica, in Digesto IV, Discipline privatistiche, sez. comm., Vol. VII (Torino, UTET, 1992) 535, 557.
- 45.
Art. 1063 Maritime Code. D’Ovidio Lefevbre, A, Pescatore, G and Tullio, L (above, fn. 21), 764.
- 46.
See Tucci, G, The preliminary draft UNIDROIT Convention (above, fn. 14), at 390.
- 47.
Arts 1525 and 1526 Italian Civil Code.
- 48.
The Convention does not expressly refer to rescue or similar procedures, which are not autonomously defined in the Convention, but mentions “rules of procedure relating to the enforcement of rights to property which is under the control or supervision of the insolvency administrator”. The Official Commentary, however, refers to an automatic stay on the enforcement of proprietary rights after commencement and illustrates it with a case concerning reorganization. See Goode, R, (2013) Official Commentary, cit. above, fn. 25, 344.
- 49.
Alternative A, see Art. XI Air Prot.; Art. IX Rail Prot.; Art. XXI Space Prot.
- 50.
Alternative B
- 51.
The Rail and Space Protocols introduced a third option (Alternative C), which is aimed at striking a balance between the other two alternatives, for more details see Goode, R, Convention on International Interests in Mobile Equipment and Luxembourg Protocol Thereto on Matters Specific to Railway Rolling Stock. Official Commentary (2nd edn., Unidroit, Rome, 2014), 421.
- 52.
Art. 1023 Italian Maritime Code.
- 53.
For example, Art. 111 (1) 1) and 111-bis Insolvency Law.
- 54.
Legislative Decree No. 270/1999 (Amministrazione straordinaria delle grandi imprese in crisi).
- 55.
Concordato fallimentare (Art. 124 et seq. Royal Decree No. 267/1942 on insolvency law); concordato preventivo (Art. 160 et seq. ins.law).
- 56.
See Guglielmucci, G, Diritto fallimentare (5th ed., Torino, Giappichelli, 2012) 272; 321.
- 57.
Tucci, G, The preliminary draft convention (above, fn. 14) 392: ‘The remedies provisions (…) and the realisation of the international interest via the procedural law of each State is naturally the part of the future Convention which could potentially create the most significant problems in so far as they will need to be applied in conjunction with the domestic law rules of each State’.
- 58.
See in particular Murino, F, L’autotutela nell’escussione della garanzia finanziaria pignoratizia, (Milano, Giuffrè, 2010), 83.
References
von Bar, C., and E. Clive (eds.). 2009. Principles, definitions and model rules of European private law, Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR). (Full ed., Sellier). vol. 6, 5389.
Beale, H., M. Bridge, L. Gullifer, and E. Lomnika. 2012. The law of security and title-based financing, 2nd ed. Oxford: OUP.
Bonell, M.J. (ed.). 1999. A new approach in international commercial contracts. The UNIDROIT principles of international commercial contracts. The Hague: Kluwer Law Int.
Bussani, M. 1998. Rapport italien, in Les garanties de financement, Travaux de l’Association Henri Capitant. vol. XLVII. Paris: LGDJ, 213.
Bussani, M. 2002. Le présent et l’avenir des sûretés réelles, in Rapports nationaux italien/Italian National Reports, XVI international congress of comparative law, Brisbane 2002. Milano : Giuffrè. 245.
Chianale, A. 2010. L’ipoteca, Trattato di diritto civile diretto da R. Sacco. In I diritti reali, vol. 6, 2nd ed, 142. Torino: UTET.
Cuming, R.C.C. 1991. International regulation of aspects of security interests in mobile equipment. Unif L Rev, 75.
Deschamps, M. 2013. The perfection and priority rules of the Cape Town Convention and the Aircraft Protocol- A comparative law analysis. Cape Town Convention Journal 2: 51.
Drobnig U. 2010. Security Rights in Movables. In Towards a European Civil Code, 4th ed. Hartkamp A.S., Hesselink M.W. et al. eds.. Wolters Kluwer, Chapter 43, 1025.
Ferrarini, G. 1997. Changes to personal property security law in Italy: A comparative and functional approach. In Making commercial law. Essays in honour of R.M. Goode, ed. R. Cranston, 477. Oxford: OUP.
Fiorentini, F. 2014. Il pegno. In Trattato dei diritti reali, vol. V, Diritti reali di garanzia, ed. A. Gambaro and U. Morello, 1. Milano: Giuffrè.
Gabrielli, E. 1998. Delle garanzie rotative. Napoli: Jovene.
Gabrielli, E. 2005. I diritti reali, vol. 5, Il pegno. In Trattato di diritto civile directed by R Sacco. Torino: UTET.
Goode, R. 1998. Transcending the boundaries of earth and space: The preliminary draft Unidroit Convention on international interests in mobile equipment. Uniform Law Review 3: 52.
Goode, R. 2014. Convention on International interests in mobile equipment and Luxembourg Protocol thereto on matters specific to railway rolling stock. Official commentary, 2nd ed. Rome: Unidroit.
Goode, R. 2013. Convention on international interests in mobile equipment and protocol thereto on matters specific to aircraft equipment, official commentary, 3rd ed. Rome: Unidroit.
Goode, R., H. Kronke, E. McKendrick, and J. Wool. 2012. Transnational commercial law. International instruments and commentary, 2nd ed. Oxford: OUP.
Graziadei, M., and Alb. Candian. 2009. Italian report. In Security rights in movable property in European private law, ed. Kieninger, E-M. Cambridge: CUP.
Guglielmucci, G. 2012. Diritto fallimentare, 5th ed. Torino: Giappichelli.
Kieninger, E.-M. (ed.). 2009. Security rights in movable property in European private law. Cambridge: CUP.
Kronke, H. 2001. Financial leasing and its unification by Unidroit. Uniform Law Review: 23.
Lefebvre D’Ovidio, A., G. Pescatore, and L. Tullio. 2013. Manuale di diritto della navigazione, 13th ed. Milano: Giuffrè.
Mastropaolo, F., P. De Vecchis, and E.M. Mastropaolo in Mastropaolo, F (ed.). 2006. I contratti di garanzia, 1, Trattato dei contratti directed by P Rescigno and E Gabrielli, 1192. Torino: UTET.
Murino, F. 2010. L'autotutela nell'escussione della garanzia finanziaria pignoratizia, 83. Milano: Giuffrè.
Righetti, G. 1992. Ipoteca navale ed aeronautica. In Digesto IV, Discipline privatistiche, sez. comm., vol. VII, 535. Torino: UTET.
Tucci, G. 1991. Garanzia. In Digesto IV, Discipline privatistiche, sez.civ., vol. VII, 579. Torino: Utet.
Tucci, G. 1999. Towards a transnational commercial law for secured transactions: The preliminary draft UNIDROIT Convention and Italian law. Uniform Law Review 4: 371.
Veneziano, A. 2007. Italy. In Cross-border security over tangibles, ed. H.C. Sigman and E.-M. Kieninger, 159. München: Sellier.
Wool, J. 2012. Treaty design, implementation, and compliance benchmarking economic benefit - A framework as applied to the Cape Town convention. Uniform Law Review 4, 633.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Veneziano, A. (2017). The Cape Town Convention and Italian Law on Secured Transactions. In: Kozuka, S. (eds) Implementing the Cape Town Convention and the Domestic Laws on Secured Transactions. Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law, vol 22. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46470-1_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46470-1_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-46468-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-46470-1
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)