Abstract
The initial idea, when the text of the Cape Town Convention was being prepared, was to create a uniform security interest, following the model of the “security interest” of the article 9 of the USA’s Uniform Commercial Code, assimilating practically the conditional sale agreements and the leasing agreements with the security agreements. This “functional” approach was partly abandoned afterwards, because it was thought that it might find hindrance in the non-common law States.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Stanford, M. (1996), Completion of a First Draft of Unidroit’s Planned Future Convention on International Interests in Mobile Equipment, Uniform Law Review, 1(2), 275, 277 (274–283); Cumming, R.C.C. (1990), International Regulation of Aspects of Security interests in mobile equipment, Uniform Law Review, 62–206.
- 2.
Moustaira, E.N. (2001), Convention on International Interests on Mobile Assets as it is applied in aircraft equipment [in Greek], Koinodikion 367–390.
- 3.
Deschamps, M. (2013), The perfection and priority rules of the Cape Town Convention and the Aircraft Protocol. A comparative law analysis, Cape Town Convention Journal, 53 (51–64).
- 4.
Foex, B. (1999), La réserve de propriété dans l’avant-projet de Convention d’UNIDROIT : un point de vue suisse, Uniform Law Review, 4(2), 416 (409–424).
- 5.
Bollweg, H.-G./Kreuzer, K. (2000), Entwürfe einer UNIDROIT/ICAO – Konvention über Internationale Sicherungsrechte an beweglicher Ausrüstung und eines Protokolls über Luftfahrtausrüstung, ZIP, 1361, 1364.
- 6.
Kreuzer, K. (1996) La propriété mobilière en droit international privé, 259 Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International, 254, 9–318; Moustaira, E.N. (1999), Security interests and private international law [in Greek], Koinodikion, 29, 31–32.
- 7.
Kalantzis, A./Metaxotou-Bontza, C./Roufos-Kanakaris, L./Warren-Kalaidopoulos, H. (2012), GREECE, in: Aircraft Finance. Registration, Security and Enforcement, Volume 2, Sweet & Maxwell, 8–9 (1–61).
- 8.
Kalantzis, A./Metaxotou-Bontza, C./Roufos-Kanakaris, L./Warren-Kalaidopoulos, H. (2012), GREECE, in: Aircraft Finance. Registration, Security and Enforcement, Volume 2, Sweet & Maxwell, 15 (1–61).
- 9.
Kalantzis, A./Metaxotou-Bontza, C./Roufos-Kanakaris, L./Warren-Kalaidopoulos, H. (2012), GREECE, in: Aircraft Finance. Registration, Security and Enforcement, Volume 2, Sweet & Maxwell,13 (1–61).
- 10.
Mauri, G. (2009), La Convenzione di Cittá del Capo e il protocollo aeronautico, Contratto e Impresa/Europa, 503, 506.
- 11.
Chadjinikolaou-Angelidou, R. (2001) The Aircraft as an Object of Transactions [in Greek], 3rd edition, Sakkoulas Editions, Athens – Thessaloniki, 261–267.
- 12.
Sagaert, V. (2004), The UNIDROIT Convention on International Interests in Mobile Equipment: a Belgian Perspective, European Review of Private Law 89–90 (75–90).
- 13.
Mooney, Jr, Ch. W (1999). Relationship between the prospective UNIDROIT International Registry, Revised Uniform Commercial Code Article 9 and national civil aviation registries, Uniform Law Review 4(2), 337–338 (335–345).
- 14.
Moustaira, E.N. (2001), Convention on International Interests on Mobile Assets as it is applied in aircraft equipment [in Greek], Koinodikion, 367–390.
- 15.
Kronke, H. (2011), Financial Leasing and its Unification by UNIDROIT – General Report, Uniform Law Review 16(1–2), 35 (23—44).
- 16.
Honnebier, B.P.(2004), The Dutch real rights of airlines can be the basis of international interests under the Convention of Cape Town, just like their equivalent American security interests, European Review of Private Law 9(1) 62 (46–66).
- 17.
Kalantzis, A. (2013), Greece, in: Aircraft Liens & Detention Rights, Sweet & Maxwell, 7 (1–22).
- 18.
The same is true, according to other laws too.
- 19.
Deschamps, M. (2013), The perfection and priority rules of the Cape Town Convention and the Aircraft Protocol. A comparative law analysis, Cape Town Convention Journal, 55 (51–64).
- 20.
Kalantzis, A./Metaxotou-Bontza, C./Roufos-Kanakaris, L./Warren-Kalaidopoulos, H. (2012), GREECE, in: Aircraft Finance. Registration, Security and Enforcement, Volume 2, 24 (1–61).
- 21.
Cuniberti, G. (2012), Advance relief under the Cape Town Convention, Cape Town Convention Journal 80 (79–94).
- 22.
Cuniberti, G. (2012), Advance relief under the Cape Town Convention, Cape Town Convention Journal, 84 (79–94).
- 23.
Kreuzer, K. (2013), Jurisdiction and choice of law under the Cape Town Convention and the Protocols thereto, Cape Town Convention Journal, 156–157 (149–164).
- 24.
Moustaira, E.N. (1998), La mise en œuvre des sûretés dans le cadre d’une faillite internationale, Revue Hellénique de Droit Internationale 89, 96.
- 25.
Rokas, N. (1974), Title reservation agreement in case of bankruptcy of the purchaser [in Greek], Nomiko Vima 449, 456–460; Moustaira, E.N. (1998), La mise en œuvre des sûretés dans le cadre d’une faillite internationale, Revue Hellénique de Droit Internationale 89, 97–98.
- 26.
However, there are also voices in favour of the adoption and ratification of the Cape Town Convention. For example, Voulgaris, I. (2010), La location-financière (leasing) en Grèce, Revue Hellénique de Droit International 223, 239, believes that is not possible that Greece adheres to the UNIDROIT Ottawa Convention 1988, which includes ships and other naval constructions, but, on the contrary, considers the idea of adoption and ratification by Greece of the Cape Town Convention and Protocols as rather positive.
- 27.
Rosen, H. (2013), Public Service and the Cape Town Convention, Cape Town Convention Journal 133 (131–147).
- 28.
Bollweg, H.-G./Schnell, K. (2007), Liability of the Registrar for the Registration of International Interests Pursuant to the Luxembourg Railway Protocol, Uniform Law Review 12(3) 571–572 (559–572).
- 29.
The same thing ascertain Bollweg, H.-G./Kreuzer, K. (2008), Das Luxemburger Eisenbahnprotokoll. Zum Protokoll zum Übereinkommen über international Sicerungsrechte an beweglicher Ausrüstung betreffend Besonderheiten des rollenden Eisenbahnmaterials vom 23.2.2007, IPRax, 176.
References
Bollweg, H.-G., and K. Kreuzer. 2000. Entwürfe einer UNIDROIT/ICAO – Konvention über Internationale Sicherungsrechte an beweglicher Ausrüstung und eines Protokolls über Luftfahrtausrüstung, ZIP, 1361
Bollweg, H.-G., and K. Schnell. 2007. Liability of the registrar for the registration of international interests pursuant to the Luxembourg railway protocol. Uniform Law Review 12(3): 559–572.
Bollweg, H.-G., and K. Kreuzer. 2008. Das Luxemburger Eisenbahnprotokoll. Zum Protokoll zum Übereinkommen über international Sicerungsrechte an beweglicher Ausrüstung betreffend Besonderheiten des rollenden Eisenbahnmaterials vom 23.2.2007. IPRax 176.
Chadjinikolaou-Angelidou, R. 2001. The aircraft as an object of transactions [in Greek]. 3rd ed. Athens – Thessaloniki: Sakkoulas Editions.
Cumming, R.C.C. 1990. International regulation of aspects of security interests in mobile equipment. Uniform Law Review 1: 62–206.
Cuniberti, G. 2012. Advance relief under the Cape Town Convention. Cape Town Convention Journal 2012: 79–94.
Deschamps, M. 2013. The perfection and priority rules of the Cape Town Convention and the Aircraft Protocol. A comparative law analysis. Cape Town Convention Journal 2013: 51–64.
Foëx, B. 1999. La réserve de propriété dans l’avant-projet de Convention d’UNIDROIT: un point de vue suisse. Uniform Law Review 4(2): 409–424.
Honnebier, B.P. 2004. The Dutch real rights of airlines can be the basis of international interests under the Convention of Cape Town, just like their equivalent American security interests. European Review of Private Law 9(1): 46–66.
Kalantzis, A., C. Metaxotou-Bontza, L. Roufos-Kanakaris, and H. Warren-Kalaidopoulos. 2012. Greece. In Aircraft finance. Registration, security and enforcement, vol. 2, 1–61. London: Sweet & Maxwell.
Kalantzis, A. 2013. Greece. In Aircraft liens & detention rights, 1–22. London: Sweet & Maxwell.
Kreuzer, K. 1996. La propriété mobilière en droit international privé. Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International 259: 9–318.
Kreuzer, K. 2013. Jurisdiction and choice of law under the Cape Town Convention and the protocols thereto. Cape Town Convention Journal 2013: 149–164.
Kronke, H. 2011. Financial leasing and its unification by UNIDROIT – General report. Uniform Law Review 16(1–2): 23–44.
Mauri, G. 2009. La Convenzione di Cittá del Capo e il protocollo aeronautico. Contratto e Impresa/Europa 503.
Mooney Jr., C.W. 1999. Relationship between the prospective UNIDROIT International Registry, Revised Uniform Commercial Code Article 9 and national civil aviation registries. Uniform Law Review 4(2): 335–345.
Moustaira, E.N. 1998. La mise en œuvre des sûretés dans le cadre d’une faillite internationale. Revue Hellénique de Droit Internationale 51: 89.
Moustaira, E.N. 1999. Security interests and private international law [in Greek]. Koinodikion 29.
Moustaira, E.N. 2001. Convention on International interests on mobile assets as it is applied in aircraft equipment [in Greek]. Koinodikion 367–390.
Rokas, N. 1974. Title reservation agreement in case of bankruptcy of the purchaser [in Greek]. Nomiko Vima 449.
Rosen, H. 2013. Public service and the Cape Town Convention. Cape Town Convention Journal 2: 131–147.
Sagaert, V. 2004. The UNIDROIT convention on international interests in mobile equipment: A Belgian perspective. European Review of Private Law 89–90: 75–90.
Stanford, M. 1996. Completion of a first draft of Unidroit’s planned future convention on International interests in mobile equipment. Uniform Law Review 1(2): 274–283.
Voulgaris, I. 2010. La location-financière (leasing) en Grèce. Revue Hellénique de Droit International 63: 223.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Moustaira, E.N. (2017). The Greek Law on Security Interests Burdening Transport Vehicles as Compared with the Cape Town Convention. In: Kozuka, S. (eds) Implementing the Cape Town Convention and the Domestic Laws on Secured Transactions. Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law, vol 22. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46470-1_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46470-1_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-46468-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-46470-1
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)