Skip to main content

Made in India for the World: An Empirical Investigation into Novelty and Nature of Innovations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Lead Market India

Part of the book series: India Studies in Business and Economics ((ISBE))

Abstract

After an initial introduction into the areas of innovations within emerging markets, the study develops a consistent innovation typology for categorizing large data samples from a variety of existing literature. It then describes and finally evaluates a sample of 178 innovations for the Indian market based on 38 different criteria. It uses internet-based news reports over a 2 year timeframe for the study sample.

The study’s results show a considerable amount of radical innovations and innovations with disruptive potential among the sample and a special concentration on small- and micro-sized innovators from India. It confirms previous suggestions that India is especially focused on innovations within the software and electronics engineering sectors. The results also support the importance of local knowledge and ‘social capital’ for successful disruptive innovation. Finally, a perceivable increase in the technology orientation of innovations by foreign companies suggests a continuous build-up of local technology-competence and foreign trust in the same.

A focus on local competencies and the leading position of India concerning innovative distribution are among the managerial implication of the study. It also opens numerous avenues for future research, expanding both depth and scale of the database as well as the analysis underlying this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Part of the population with less than US$1500 p.a. at purchasing power parity at their disposal; roughly four billion people worldwide (Prahalad & Hart, 2002).

References

  • Ablett, J., Baijal, A., Beinhocker, E., Bose, A., Farrell, D., Gersch, U., et al. (2007). The ‘bird of gold’: The rise of India’s consumer market. San Francisco: McKinsey Global Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellman, E., Misquitta, S., & Glader, P. (2009). Indian firms shift focus to the poor. Wall Street Journal Online.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarty, R. (2010, November 21). Bollywood channel Zing creates India’s first channel innovation, press release. Mumbai: Zee Networks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandy, R. K., & Tellis, G. J. (2000). The incumbent’s curse? Incumbency, size, and radical product innovation. The Journal of Marketing, 64, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator’s solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, H., Dubiel, A., & Fischer, M. (2009). Industrielle Forschung Und Entwicklung in Emerging Markets: Motive, Erfolgsfaktoren, Best-Practice-Beispiele. Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat. (2008). NACE Rev. 2 – Statistical classification of economic activities in the European Community. Luxembourg: Eurostat – Statistical Office of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat. (2011). Key figures on European business. Luxembourg: Eurostat – Statistical Office of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, R., & Calantone, R. (2001). A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: A literature review. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19, 110–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerybadze, A., & Merk, S. (2014). Offshore R&D and host-country patenting of multinational corporations in emerging countries. International Journal of Technology Management, 64(2–4), 148–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbert, M., Hoegl, M., & Välikangas, L. (2007). In praise of resource constraints. MIT Sloan Management Review, 48(3), 15–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gradl, C., Herrndorf, M., Knobloch, C., & Sengupta, R. (2010). Learning to insure the poor – microinsurance report. Munich: Allianz Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. L., & Christensen, C. M. (2002). The great leap. Sloan Management Review, 44(1), 51–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herstatt, C., Tiwari, R., Buse, S., & Ernst, D. (2008). India’s national innovation system: Key elements and corporate perspectives. East-West Center Working Papers. Economic Series 96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. W. L., & Rothaermel, F. T. (2003). The performance of incumbent firms in the face of radical technological innovation. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 257–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Immelt, J. R., Govindarajan, V., & Trimble, C. (2009). How GE is disrupting itself. Harvard Business Review, October, 56–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowledge@Wharton. (2005). Human capital: Can India bridge the knowledge gaps needed for research? Knowledge@Wharton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, N., & Puranam, P. (2012). India inside: The emerging innovation challenge to the West. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y., Lin, B. W., Wong, Y. Y., & Calantone, R. J. (2011). Understanding and managing international product launch: A comparison between developed and emerging markets. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(s1), 104–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan, V., & Ramola, B. G. (1996). Financial services for the rural poor and women in India: Access and sustainability. Journal of International Development, 8(2), 211–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakata, C. (2012). Creating new products and services for and with the base of the pyramid. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(1), 3–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD, & Eurostat. (2005). Oslo manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (in joint publication with Eurostat).

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Hart, S. L. (2002). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid. Strategy + Business, Spring (26), 2–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Mashelkar, R. A. (2010). Innovation’s holy grail. Harvard Business Review, July–August, 132–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • RBI. (2011). Handbook of statistics on Indian economy. Mumbai: Reserve Bank of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung: Eine Untersuchung über Unternehmergewinn, Kapital, Kredit, Zins und den Konjukturzyklus. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sehgal, V., Dehoff, K., & Panneer, G. (2010). The importance of frugal engineering. Strategy + Business, Summer(59), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subramaniam, M., & Youndt, M. A. (2005). The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. The Academy of Management Journal, 48, 450–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari, R., & Herstatt, C. (2012a). Frugal innovations for the ‘unserved’ customer: An assessment of India’s attractiveness as a lead market for cost-effective products. Hamburg University of Technology – Working Paper 69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari, R., & Herstatt, C. (2012b). India – a lead market for frugal innovations? Extending the lead market theory to emerging economies. Hamburg University of Technology – Working Paper 67.

    Google Scholar 

  • TRAI. (2011). Highlights of telecom subscription data as on 31st December, 2011. New Delhi: Telecom Regulatory Authority of India. Press Release.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. (2005). Globalization of R&D and developing countries: Proceedings of the expert meeting. New York: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utterback, J. M., & Abernathy, W. J. (1975). A dynamic model of process and product innovation. The International Journal of Management Science, 3(6), 639–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vardi, M. Y. (2010). Globalization and offshoring of software revisited. Communications of the ACM, 53(5), 5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veach, E. (2010). Vecor recycles waste from coal plants into building materials. The Wall Street Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, A. (2010). The world turned upside down – a special report on innovation in emerging markets. The Economist, London,

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Rajnish Tiwari would like to sincerely thank Claussen Simon Foundation for supporting his research at TUHH with a generous grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rajnish Tiwari .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hagenau, D.T., Tiwari, R. (2017). Made in India for the World: An Empirical Investigation into Novelty and Nature of Innovations. In: Herstatt, C., Tiwari, R. (eds) Lead Market India. India Studies in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46392-6_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics