Skip to main content

Intrinsic Complexity of Partial Learning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Algorithmic Learning Theory (ALT 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9925))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1146 Accesses

Abstract

A partial learner in the limit [16], given a representation of the target language (a text), outputs a sequence of conjectures, where one correct conjecture appears infinitely many times and other conjectures each appear a finite number of times. Following [5, 14], we define intrinsic complexity of partial learning, based on reducibilities between learning problems. Although the whole class of recursively enumerable languages is partially learnable (see [16]) and, thus, belongs to the complete learnability degree, we discovered a rich structure of incomplete degrees, reflecting different types of learning strategies (based, to some extent, on topological structures of the target language classes). We also exhibit examples of complete classes that illuminate the character of the strategies for partial learning of the hardest classes.

S. Jain—Supported in part by NUS grant numbers C252-000-087-001 and R146-000-181-112.

E. Kinber—Supported by URCG grant from Sacred Heart University.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Angluin, D.: Inductive inference of formal languages from positive data. Inf. Control 45, 117–135 (1980)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Angluin, D.: Learning regular sets from queries and counter-examples. Inf. Comput. 75, 87–106 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Blum, M.: A machine-independent theory of the complexity of recursive functions. J. ACM 14(2), 322–336 (1967)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Case, J., Kötzing, T.: Computability-theoretic learning complexity. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London 370, 3570–3596 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Freivalds, R., Kinber, E., Smith, C.: On the intrinsic complexity of learning. Inf. Comput. 123(1), 64–71 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Gao, Z., Jain, S., Stephan, F.: On conservative learning of recursively enumerable languages. In: Bonizzoni, P., Brattka, V., Löwe, B. (eds.) CiE 2013. LNCS, vol. 7921, pp. 181–190. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gao, Z., Jain, S., Stephan, F., Zilles, S.: A survey on recent results on partial learning. In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth Asian Logic Conference, pp. 68–92. World Scientific (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gold, E.M.: Language identification in the limit. Inf. Control 10(5), 447–474 (1967)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Gao, Z., Stephan, F.: Confident and consistent partial learning of recursive functions. In: Bshouty, N.H., Stoltz, G., Vayatis, N., Zeugmann, T. (eds.) ALT 2012. LNCS, vol. 7568, pp. 51–65. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Gao, Z., Stephan, F., Zilles, S.: Combining models of approximation with partial learning. In: Chaudhuri, K., Gentile, C., Zilles, S. (eds.) ALT 2015. LNSC (LNAI), vol. 9355, pp. 56–70. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Hopcroft, J., Ullman, J.: Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages, and Computation. Addison-Wesley, Boston (1979)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Jain, S., Kinber, E., Papazian, C., Smith, C., Wiehagen, R.: On the intrinsic complexity of learning recursive functions. Inf. Comput. 184(1), 45–70 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Jain, S., Kinber, E., Wiehagen, R.: Language learning from texts: degrees of intrinsic complexity and their characterizations. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 63, 305–354 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Jain, S., Sharma, A.: The intrinsic complexity of language identification. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 52, 393–402 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Jain, S., Stephan, F.: Consistent partial learning. In: Proceedings of the Twenty Second Annual Conference on Learning Theory (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Osherson, D., Stob, M., Weinstein, S.: Systems that Learn: An Introduction to Learning Theory for Cognitive and Computer Scientists. MIT Press, Cambridge (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rogers, H.: Theory of Recursive Functions and Effective Computability. McGraw-Hill, New York (1967). Reprinted by MIT Press in 1987

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Frank Stephan and the referees for several helpful comments, which improved the presentation of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanjay Jain .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jain, S., Kinber, E. (2016). Intrinsic Complexity of Partial Learning. In: Ortner, R., Simon, H., Zilles, S. (eds) Algorithmic Learning Theory. ALT 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9925. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46379-7_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46379-7_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-46378-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-46379-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics