Advertisement

Estrogen and Cardiac Events with all-cause Mortality. A Critical Review

  • Joseph RagazEmail author
  • Shayan Shakeraneh
Chapter

Abstract

As seen in the first part of this review, the primary objective of the WHI HRT trials was to evaluate the impact of HRT on cardiac and degenerative conditions among elderly women, where these outcomes are most frequent, and not necessarily to study the impact of HRT on menopause-related outcomes, or on primary prevention of heart and vascular diseases, which would require a much younger female population. The differential age impact of HRT on cardiovascular outcomes is singled out in this second chapter of our HRT review of particular importance, as the “harm versus benefit” ratio seen among older women may not necessarily be applicable to younger age groups. Specifically, as discussed below, cardiac gains have been restricted to young women and have not been identified in the elderly female population, as seen from most past trials, and now more lately also from the WHI HRT trials. The other issue requiring clarification is the agent specificity, within the HRT combination, and in particular, it is the HRT based on estrogen-alone which would render significant cardiac protection [i.e., evidence from WHI HRT trial 2], while HRT based on estrogen plus Provera combination [E + P] as seen in the WHI trial 1, would not materialize these benefits. As seen in Table 1, the rate of myocardial infarction among the younger women aged 50–59 was reduced in estrogen alone trial by 40–45 %, compared, to an actual rate increase of 25–27 % among women of similar age 50–59 in the combined estrogen plus progestin trial. So we have at least two HRT issues requiring clarification: First, can one today, in 2016, endorse more fully the “HRT cardiac timing hypothesis” where HRT cardiac benefits are restricted to young women only; and second, whether Progestin Provera would attenuate estrogen cardiac benefits, as there is some evidence at least from the overview of the WHI HRT trials that adding the Medroxyprogesterone Provera in the E + P combination would basically abolish benefits seen with estrogen alone.

Keywords

Breast cancer Women Health Initiative [WHI] Hormone Replacement Therapy [HRT] Estrogen Progestin Provera Double-blind randomized trial Observational studies Cardiac events All-cause mortality The timing hypothesis Myocardial Infarction rates Atherosclerogenesis Tibolone BRCA status 

References

  1. 1.
    Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL, et al. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results From the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288:321–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Manson JE, Chlebowski RT, Stefanick ML, et al. Menopausal hormone therapy and health outcomes during the intervention and extended poststopping phases of the women’s health initiative randomized trials. JAMA. 2013;310:1353–68.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anderson GL, Limacher M, Assaf AR, et al. Effects of conjugated equine estrogen in postmenopausal women with hysterectomy: the women’s health initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004;291:1701–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Grady D, Rubin SM, Petitti DB, et al. Hormone therapy to prevent disease and prolong life in postmenopausal women [see comments]. Ann Intern Med. 1992;117:1016–37.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ragaz J, Coldman AJ. Age-matched all-cause mortality impact of hormone replacement therapy: applicability to breast cancer survivors. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1999;57:30.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grodstein F, Stampfer MJ, Manson JE, et al. Postmenopausal estrogen and progestin use and the risk of cardiovascular disease [see comments] [published erratum appears in N Engl J Med 1996 Oct 31;335(18):1406]. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:453–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grodstein F, Manson JE, Colditz GA, Willett WC, Speizer FE, Stampfer MJ. A prospective, observational study of postmenopausal hormone therapy and primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133:933–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grodstein F, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ. Hormone therapy and coronary heart disease: the role of time since menopause and age at hormone initiation. J Women’s Health. 2002;2006(15):35–44.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Salpeter SR, Walsh JM, Ormiston TM, Greyber E, Buckley NS, Salpeter EE. Meta-analysis: effect of hormone-replacement therapy on components of the metabolic syndrome in postmenopausal women. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2006;8:538–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Salpeter SR, Walsh JM, Greyber E, Salpeter EE. Brief report: coronary heart disease events associated with hormone therapy in younger and older women. A meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21:363–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hodis HN, Mack WJ, Henderson VW, et al. Vascular effects of early versus late postmenopausal treatment with estradiol. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:1221–31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hodis HN, Mack WJ, Lobo RA, et al. Estrogen in the prevention of atherosclerosis. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135:939–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schierbeck LL, Rejnmark L, Tofteng CL, et al. Effect of hormone replacement therapy on cardiovascular events in recently postmenopausal women: randomised trial. BMJ (Clinical Research ed). 2012;345:e6409.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Savolainen-Peltonen H, Tuomikoski P, Korhonen P, et al. Cardiac death risk in relation to the age at initiation or the progestin component of hormone therapies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016:jc20154149.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Smith NL, Heckbert SR, Lemaitre RN, et al. Esterified estrogens and conjugated equine estrogens and the risk of venous thrombosis. JAMA. 2004;292:1581–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Smith NL, Blondon M, Wiggins KL, et al. Lower risk of cardiovascular events in postmenopausal women taking oral estradiol compared with oral conjugated equine estrogens. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174:25–31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shufelt CL, Merz CN, Prentice RL, et al. Hormone therapy dose, formulation, route of delivery, and risk of cardiovascular events in women: findings from the women’s health initiative observational study. Menopause (New York, NY) 2014;21:260–6.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Manson JE, Allison MA, Rossouw JE, et al. Estrogen therapy and coronary-artery calcification. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:2591–602.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Manson JE. The ‘timing hypothesis’ for estrogen therapy in menopausal symptom management. Women’s Health (London, England) 2015;11:437–40.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Barrett-Connor E. Hormones and heart disease in women: the timing hypothesis. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;166:506–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    LaCroix AZ, Chlebowski RT, Manson JE, et al. Health outcomes after stopping conjugated equine estrogens among postmenopausal women with prior hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2011;305:1305–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bassuk SS, Manson JE. The timing hypothesis: do coronary risks of menopausal hormone therapy vary by age or time since menopause onset? Metab Clin Exp. 2016;65:794–803.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bray PF, Larson JC, Lacroix AZ, et al. Usefulness of baseline lipids and C-reactive protein in women receiving menopausal hormone therapy as predictors of treatment-related coronary events. Am J Cardiol. 2008;101:1599–605.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mendelsohn M, Lobo R. Cardiovascular health and the menopause—an approach for gynecologists: an overview. Climacteric: J Int Menopause Soc. 2006;9(Suppl 1):1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mendelsohn ME, Karas RH. Molecular and cellular basis of cardiovascular gender differences. Science (New York, NY). 2005;308:1583–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Manson JE. The Kronos early estrogen prevention study by Charlotte Barker. Women’s Health (London, England) 2013;9:9–11.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Grady D, Applegate W, Bush T, Furberg C, Riggs B, Hulley SB. Heart and estrogen/progestin replacement study (HERS): design, methods, and baseline characteristics. Control Clin Trials. 1998;19:314–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gurney EP, Nachtigall MJ, Nachtigall LE, Naftolin F. The women’s health initiative trial and related studies: 10 years later: a clinician’s view. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2014;142:4–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Stuenkel C, Barrett-Connor E. Hormone replacement therapy: where are we now? West J Med. 1999;171:27–30.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kloosterboer HJ. Tibolone: a steroid with a tissue-specific mode of action. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2001;76:231–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Formoso G, Perrone E, Maltoni S, et al. Short and long term effects of tibolone in postmenopausal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;2:CD008536.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cummings SR, Ettinger B, Delmas PD, et al. The effects of tibolone in older postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:697–708.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kenemans P, Bundred NJ, Foidart JM, et al. Safety and efficacy of tibolone in breast-cancer patients with vasomotor symptoms: a double-blind, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:135–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Eisen A, Lubinski J, Klijn J, et al. Breast cancer risk following bilateral oophorectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: an international case-control study. J Clin Oncol: Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2005;23:7491–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Eisen A, Lubinski J, Gronwald J, et al. Hormone therapy and the risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:1361–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ragaz J, Wilson K, Muraca G, Budlovsky J, Froehlich J. Dual estrogen effects on breast cancer: endogenous estrogen stimulates, exogenous estrogen protects. Further investigation of estrogen chemoprevention is warranted. Cancer Res. 2010;70.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Population and Public HealthUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations