Abstract
This chapter examines how instruction for standardized math examination proctors aid or impede them in guiding linguistic and culturally diverse students to perform their best in unfamiliar high-stakes exams. Drawing on critical multimodal analyses (Kress and van Leeuwen, Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). London: Routledge, 2006), this chapter makes visible the multimodal assumptions in these instructions and how institutionalized examination practices neglect culturally and linguistically diverse learners, jeopardize their access to higher education, and decrease their chances for becoming productive contributing members in their communities. A research agenda that sustains and nurtures English as additional language learners’ first language resources is suggested to direct attention to areas that could aid them in negotiating unfamiliar high-stakes multimodal texts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abedi, J., Hofstetter, C., Baker, E., & Lord, C. (2001). NAEP mathematics performance and test accommodations: Interactions with student language background. Technical Report No. 536. Retrieved from National Center for Research on Evaluation Standards, & Student Testing. Website http://www.cse.ucla.edu/products/Reports/TR536.pdf.
Abedi, J. (2002). Standardized achievement tests and English Language Learners: Psychometrics issues. Educational Assessment, 8(3), 231–257.
Abedi, J., Courtney, M., Leon, S., Kao, J., & Azzam, T. (2006). English Language Learners and math achievement: A study of opportunity to learn and language accommodation. Technical Report No. 702. Los Angeles, CA: CRESST/UCLA. Retrieved from ERIC. Website http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED495848.
Abedi, J., & Lord, C. (2001). The language factor in mathematics tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 14(3), 219–234.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council of Measurement in Education (AERA, APA, & NCME). (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Education Research Association (AERA).
Austin, T., & Ites, E. (2012). Testing/assessing literacies: How do educators build useful knowledge about second language development? Languages and Linguistics, 29(30), 181–210.
Bavali, M., Yamini, M., & Sadighi, F. (2011). Dynamic assessment in perspective: Demarcating dynamic and non-dynamic boundaries. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(4), 895–902. doi:10.4304/jltr.2.4.895-902.
Emihovich, C. (1994). The language of testing: An ethnographic-sociolinguistic perspective on standardized tests. In K. Holland, D. Bloome, & J. Solsken (Eds.), Alternative perspectives in assessing children’s language and literacy (pp. 33–54). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Fairbairn, S. B., & Fox, J. (2009). Inclusive achievement testing for linguistically and culturally diverse test takers: Essential considerations for test developers and decision makers. National Council on Measurement in Education. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 28(1), 10–24. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2009.01133.x.
Garcia, E., Lawton, K., & Diniz De Figuereido, E. H. (2010). Assessment of young English language learners in Arizona: Questioning the validity of the state measures of English proficiency. Los Angeles, CA: The Civil Rights Project, University of California.
Guilherme, M. (2007). English as a global language and education for cosmopolitan citizenship. Language and Intercultural Communication, 7(1), 72–90.
Hemphill, F. C., & Vanneman A. (2011). Achievement gap: How Hispanic and White students in public schools perform in mathematics and reading on the national assessment of educational progress. National Center for Educational Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/studies/2011459.pdf website.
Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen T. (1998). Front pages: (The critical) analysis of newspaper layout. In A. Bell & P. Garrett (Eds.), Approaches to media discourse (pp. 186–219). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Lobato, J., Hohensee C., & Diamond J. M. (2014). What can we learn by comparing students’ diagram-construction processes with the mathematical conceptions inferred from their explanations with completed diagrams? Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26(3), 607–634.
Mahoney, K., Haladyna, T., & MacSwan, J. (2009). The need for multiple measures in reclassification decisions: A validity study of the Stanford English Language Proficiency Test. In T. G. Wiley, J. S. Lee, & R. Rumberger (Eds.), The education of language minority immigrants in the United States (pp. 240–262). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Mihai, F.M. (2010). Assessing English language learners in the content areas: A research into practice guide for educator. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
O’Connor, M. C. (2006). The implicit discourse genres of standardized testing: What verbal analogy items require of test takers. In J. Cook Gumperz (Ed.), The social construction of literacy (2nd ed.., pp. 264–287). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Paris, J., & Alim, H. S. (2014). What are we seeking to sustain through culturally sustaining pedagogy? A loving critique forward. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 85–100.
Partnership for Assessment of Readiness For College and Careers (PARCC). (2014). PARCC Accessibility Features and Accommodations Manual. Appendix J: PARCC Mathematics Audio Guidelines Version 3.0. Retrieved from http://www.jcboe.org/boe2015/images/PARCCCCSS/PARCC%20appendix-j-math-audio.pdf.
Robison, S. (2010). Teaching math to English learners-myths and methods. In E. N. Whelan Ariza (Ed.), Not for ESOL teachers. What every classroom teacher needs to know about the linguistically, culturally, and ethnically diverse student (pp. 127–139). Boston, MA: Pearson, Allyn & Bacon.
Royce, T. (2007). Multimodal communicative competence in second language contexts. In T. Royce & W. Bowcher (Eds.), New directions in the analysis of multimodal discourse (pp. 361–390). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Schafer Willner, L., Rivera, C., & Acosta, B. (2008). Descriptive study of state assessment policies for accommodating English language learners. Oregon Department of Education. Retrieved from website www.ode.state.or.us/wma/teachlearn/commoncore/descriptivestudyell.pdf.
Shohamy, E. 2014). The power of tests: A critical perspective on the uses of language tests. ([Kindle version]. Retrieved from Amazon.com.
Short, D. J., & Fitzsimmons, S. (2007). Double the work: Challenges and solutions to acquiring language and academic literacy for adolescent English language learners – A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Retrieved from Carnegie Corporation of New York website: https://www.carnegie.org/media/filer_public/bd/d8/bdd80ac7-fb48-4b97-b082-df8c49320acb/ccny_report_2007_double.pdf.
Trumbull, E., & Solano-Flores, G. (2011a). The role of language in assessment. In M. R. Basterra, E. Trumbull, & G. Solano-Flores (Eds.), Cultural validity in assessment: Addressing linguistic and cultural diversity (pp. 22–45). New York: Routledge.
Trumbull, E., & Solano-Flores, G. (2011b). Addressing the language demands of mathematics assessments: Using a language framework and field-based research findings. In M. R. Basterra, E. Trumbull, & G. Solano-Flores (Eds.), Cultural validity in assessment: Addressing linguistic and cultural diversity (pp. 218–253). New York: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Austin, T. (2017). What’s At Stake in a High-Stakes Math Test? Analysis of Multimodal Challenges for Emergent English Bilingual Learners. In: Pirbhai-Illich, F., Pete, S., Martin, F. (eds) Culturally Responsive Pedagogy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46328-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46328-5_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-46327-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-46328-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)