Skip to main content

Controversies Concerning Early Treatment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Clinical Cases in Early Orthodontic Treatment
  • 2316 Accesses

Abstract

Why are controversies in early treatment a continuous topic in all worldwide meetings after more than 100 years? Will it be solved in the next 10 years?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Bahreman A Early age orthodontic treatmnet. Quintessence: Bahreman Quintessence Publishing Co. Chicago/Berlin/Tokyo/London/ParisMilan/Barcelona. 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Biase A. The timing of orthodontic treatment. Dent Update. 2002;29:434–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dugoni S, Lee J, Varela J, Dugoni A. Early mixed dentition treatment : post-retention evaluation of stability and relapse. Angle Orthod. 1995;65:311–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Franchi L, Baccetti T, Giuntini V, Masucci C, Vangelisti A, Defraia E. Outcomes of two-phase orthodontic treatment of deepbite malocclusions. Angle Orthod. 2011;81:945–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gianelli A. One-phase vs two –phase treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;108:556–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graber T. Mixed dentition guidance of occlusion. Serial extraction procedures in Bishara Samir Texbook of Orthodontics WB Saunders Company; Graber Mosby St Louis/Philadelphia/London/Sydney/Toronto. 2001;257–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn A, Thiers-Jegou I. Class II deep bite faces One phase or two-phase treatment ? World J Orthod. 2005;2:171–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jang JC, Fields HW, Vig KW, Beck FM. Controversies in the timing of Orthodontic Treatment. Semin Orthod. 2005;11(3):108–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King GJ, McGorray SP, Wheeler TT, Dolce C, Taylor M. Comparison of peer assessment ratings (PAR) from 1-phase and 2-phase treatment protocols for Class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;123(5):489–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Littlewood S, Nute S, Stivaros N, McDowall R, et al. Is early Class III protraction facemask treatment effective? A multicentre, randomized, controlled trial: 15-month follow-up. J Orthod. 2010;37:149–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mandall N, DiBiase A, Littlewood S, Nute S, Stivaros N, McDowall R, et al. Is early Class III protraction facemask treatment effective? A multicentre, randomized, controlled trial: 15-month follow-up. J Orthod. 2010;37:149–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sugawara J, Asano T, Endo N, Mitani H. Long-term effects of chincap therapy on skeletal profile in mandibular prognathism. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990;98:127–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julia Harfin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Harfin, J., Faltin, K. (2017). Controversies Concerning Early Treatment. In: Harfin, J., Satravaha, S., Faltin Jr, K. (eds) Clinical Cases in Early Orthodontic Treatment . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46251-6_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46251-6_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-46250-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-46251-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics