Advertisement

A Cultural Perspective on the City

  • Hari SacréEmail author
  • Sven De Visscher
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Education book series (BRIEFSEDUCAT)

Abstract

This chapter introduces a cultural perspective on civic learning in urban as spaces as the general framework of this publication. Western societies tend to think of urban public spaces as key sites for civic and political formation. Based on socio-spatial frameworks that picture civic learning as a positive outcome of the free mingling of strangers in streets and other material structures, urban planning too often reduces urban spaces to people and bricks. From a cultural perspective such binary images of the city are questioned. Referring to culture as  an ongoing communicative process between subjects and objects producing (symbolic) meanings, the production of space appears as an ongoing interaction among subjects, symbolic frameworks and dynamic infrastructures. A spatial grammar of urban learning is introduced. Learning the city results from the relations between people, materials and environment. The papers in this publication contribute to an understanding of civic learning as an everyday practice in which subjects, symbolic frameworks and dynamic infrastructures are interconnected. In other words, we are interested in learning as an everyday practice that alludes to a sense of co-ownership, rather than an act of social conformation. To understand civic learning in urban spaces as a cultural process, the different contributions in this publication will focus on the multiple relationships between learning and the city. They will explore different understandings of civic learning in, through and as a result of urban spaces. 

Keywords

Urban education Civic learning Citizenship Cultural semiotics   

Bibliography

  1. Ahearne, J. (1995). Michel de Certeau: Interpretation and its other. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Amin, A. (2008). Collective culture and urban public space. City, 12(1), 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amin, A. (2015). Animated space. Public Culture, 27(2 76), 239–258.Google Scholar
  4. Amin, A., Massey, D. B., & Thrift, N. J. (2000). Cities for the many not the few. Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  5. Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (2002). Cities: Reimagining the urban. Cambridge: Polity Press. Google Scholar
  6. Baetens, J., & Verstraete, G. (2009). Culturele studies : Theorie in de praktijk. Google Scholar
  7. Biesta, G. (2005). The learning democracy? Adult learning and the condition of democratic citizenship. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 26(5), 687–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Biesta, G. (2010). How to exist politically and learn from it: Hannah Arendt and the problem of democratic education. Teachers College Record, 112(2), 556–575. Google Scholar
  9. Biesta, G. (2012). Becoming public: Public pedagogy, citizenship and the public sphere. Social and Cultural Geography, 13(7), 683–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Biesta, G., De Bie, M., & Wildemeersch, D. (2014). civic learning, democratic citizenship and the public sphere. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Biesta, G., & Lawy, R. (2006). From teaching citizenship to learning democracy: Overcoming individualism in research, policy and practice. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36(1), 63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chattopadhyay, S. (2012). Unlearning the city: Infrastructure in a new optical field. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De Certeau, M. (2011). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  14. Dovey, K. (2010). Becoming places. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Dirksmeier, P., & Helbrecht, I. (2008). Time, non-representational theory and the ‘Performative Turn’—Towards a new methodology in qualitative social research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9(2).Google Scholar
  16. Eco, U. (1976). A theory of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. In M. B. Ramos (Trans.). New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  18. Gehl, J. (2010). Cities for people. Washington: Island Press.Google Scholar
  19. Gehl, J. (2011). Life between buildings: Using public space. Washington: Island Press.Google Scholar
  20. Gehl, J., & Svarre, B. (2013). How to study public life. Washington: Island Press.Google Scholar
  21. Giroux, H. A. (2004). Public pedagogy and the politics of neo-liberalism: Making the political more pedagogical. Policy Futures in Education, 2(3–4), 494–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hall, S., & Du Gay P. (Eds.). (1996). Questions of cultural identity (Reprint ed.). London , Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  23. Hoggart, R., & Passeron, J.-C. (1970). La Culture du Pauvre: Etude sur le style de vie des classes populaires e Angleterre. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar
  24. Holston, J. (2009). Insurgent citizenship in an era of global urban peripheries. City & Society, 21(2), 245–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ingold, T. (2000). The perception of the environment: Essays in livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jacobs, J. (1992). The death and life of great American cities. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  27. Leach, N. (1997). Rethinking architecture: A reader in cultural theory. In N. Leach (Ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  29. Loopmans, M., Newton, C., & Leclercq, E. (2011). Plannen voor mensen: Handboek sociaal - ruimtelijke planning. Antwerpen: Garant.Google Scholar
  30. Marquand, D. (2004). Decline of the public: The hollowing out of citizenship. Oxford: Polity.Google Scholar
  31. Martin, D. G. (2009). Chicago school. In The dictionary of human geography. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  32. McCann, E., & Ward, K. (2011). Mobile urbanism: Cities and policymaking in the global age. Minneapolis, London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  33. McFarlane, C. (2011). Learning the city: Knowledge and translocal assemblage. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  34. Noë, A. (2012). Varieties of presence. Harvard: Cambridge Mass.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nöth, W. (1995). Handbook of semiotics. Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Pink, W. T., & Noblit, G. W. (Eds.). (2008). International handbook of urban education (2007 ed.). Springer.Google Scholar
  37. Podlaszewski, G. (2012). Barthes’ invitation to urban semiology. Urban space critics. http://criticalurbanspace.wordpress.com/2012/11/16/barthes-invitation-to-urban-semiology/. Accessed March 31, 2014.
  38. Rancière, J. (2003). The thinking of dissensus: Politics and aesthetics. Bloomsburry Academic.Google Scholar
  39. Reinders, L. (2013). Harde stad, zachte stad, Moderne architectuur en de antropologie van een naoorlogse wijk. Delft: Sieca.Google Scholar
  40. Sacré, H., & De Visscher, S. (2014). Learning the city, a semiotic reading of children’s politics in urban spaces. Presented at the ECER in Budapest. Google Scholar
  41. Sandercock, L. (1998). Making the invisible visible: A multicultural planning history. Oakland: University of California Press. Google Scholar
  42. Simone, A. (2011). The surfacing of urban life. City, 15(3–4), 355–364.Google Scholar
  43. Simonsen, K. (2005). Bodies, sensations, space and time: The contribution from Henri Lefebvre. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 87(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Soenen, R. (2006). Het kleine ontmoeten: over het sociale karakter van de stad. Antwerpen: Garant.Google Scholar
  45. Spatscheck, C. (2012). Socio-spatial approaches to social work. Social Work & Society, 10(1).Google Scholar
  46. Staeheli, L. A., Attoh, K., & Mitchell, D. (2013). Contested engagements: Youth and the politics of citizenship. Space and Polity, 17(1), 88–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Swyngedouw, E. (2014). Where is the political? Insurgent mobilisations and the incipient ‘return of the political’. Space and Polity, 18(2), 122–136.Google Scholar
  48. Taylor, P. (2013). Extraordinary cities. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  49. Van der Burgt, D., & Gustafson, K. (2013). ‘Doing Time’ and ‘Creating Space’: A case study of outdoor play and institutionalized leisure in an urban family. Children, Youth and Environments, 23(3), 24–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Whyte, W. H., Municipal Art Society of New York, Street Life Project, & Direct Cinema Ltd. (1988). The social life of small urban spaces. Los Angeles, CA: Direct Cinema Ltd.Google Scholar
  51. Williams, R. (1981). The sociology of culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  52. Wilson, J., & Swyngedouw, E. (2014). The post-political and its discontents: Spaces of depoliticization. Spectres of Radical Politics: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wolfrum, S., & Brandis, N. (2015) Performative urbanism: Generating and designing urban space. Berlin: Jovis.Google Scholar
  54. Wolfrum, S. (2013). Symposium performative urbanism—Introduction Prof. Sophie Wolfrum. http://vimeo.com/74039238. Accessed November 19, 2013.
  55. Zukin, S. (1980). A decade of the new urban sociology. Theory and Society, 9(4), 575–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Group Urban Education, Department Social WorkUniversity College GhentGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations