Skip to main content

Workplace Learning, Big Data, and Organizational Readiness: Where to Start?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Digital Workplace Learning

Abstract

There is a growing need for professionals who are able to analyze large data sets to inform business decisions. Evidence for this need is presented through examples of big data and analytics used to inform and assess informal and formal workplace learning initiatives, embeding big data within a performance improvement (PI) framework, and delivering an emerging organizational readiness model. If big data and analytics could address these needs, then the organizational readiness for this potential solution can be determined. Thus, the authors conclude by describing an emerging model of big data readiness in organizations and its implications for determining readiness. Recommendations for other future research are also provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alam, G. R., Masum, A. K., Beh, L.-S., & Hong, C. S. (2016). Critical factors influencing decision to adopt human resource information system (HRIS) in hospitals. PLoS One, 11(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160366

  • Alkhalil, A., Sahandi, R., & John, D. (2017). An exploration of the determinants for decision to migrate existing resources to cloud computing using an integrated toe-doi model. Journal of Cloud Computing, 6(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13677-016-0072-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alkhater, N., Wills, G., & Walters, R. (2015). Factors affecting an organisation's decision to adopt cloud services in Saudi Arabia. Paper presented at the 3rd international conference on future Internet of things and cloud, FiCloud 2015, August 24, 2015–August 26, 2015, Rome, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aron, D., Waller, G., & Weldon, L. (2015). Flipping to digital leadership: The 2015 CIO Agenda (Executive Summary).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berk, J., & Magee, S. (2005). Technological considerations in learning analytics. Chief Learning Officer, 4(7), 42–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chevalier, R. (2003). Updating the behavior engineering model. Performance Improvement, 42(5), 8–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chyung, S. Y. (2008). Foundations of instructional and performance technology. Amherst, MA: HRD Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyle, T. J. (2016). L&D delivery system needs. Training, 53(6), 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Laat, M. F., & Schreurs, B. (2011). Network awareness tool: Social software for visualizing, analysing and managing social networks. Heerlen: Ruud de Moor Centrum, Open Universiteit Nederland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolezalek, H. (2003). Measure for measure. Training, 40(11), 72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, G. (2014). What’s the big deal about big data? Training Magazine, 51(2), 16–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everson, K. (2015). Leave learning to employees. Chief Learning Officer, 14(11), 30–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foshay, W. R., Villachica, S. W., & Stepich, D. A. (2014). Cousins but not twins: Instructional design and human performance technology in the workplace. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 39–49). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gandomi, A., & Haider, M. (2015). Beyond the hype: Big data concepts, methods, and analytics. International Journal of Information Management, 35(2), 137–144..

    Google Scholar 

  • Giacumo, L. A., & Breman, J. (2016). Emerging evidence of the use of big data and learning analytics in workplace learning: A systematic literature review. Quarterly Review Distance Education, 17, 21–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giacumo, L. A., Breman, J., & Villachica, S. W. (2016, October). Big data and analytics for big wins: Environmental cues, readiness indicators, and select analytics applications for improving workplace performance. Poster presented at the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Las Vegas, NV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giacumo, L. A., & Villachica, S. W. (2016, September). Big data meets performance improvement: Separating promise from hype. Paper presented at the Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) conference of the International Society for Performance Improvement, Bonn, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, T. F. (1978). Human competence: Engineering worthy performance. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 213–236. https://doi.org/10.2307/249689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagel, J. (2012). Executives turn data into internal insight. Journal of Accountancy, 213(5), 26–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B. (2013). Will big data equal big learning? Chief Learning Officer, 12(3), 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanafizadeh, P., & Ravasan, A. Z. (2011). A McKinsey 7S model-based framework for ERP readiness assessment. International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems, 7(4), 23–63. https://doi.org/10.4018/jeis.2011100103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haney, B. D. (2002). Assessing organizational readiness for E‐learning: 70 questions to ask. Performance Improvement, 41(4), 10–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harless, J. H. (1987). An analysis of front-end analysis. Performance + Instruction, 26(2), 7–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.4160260204

  • Hartley, D. (2004). A love-hate thing. T+D, 58(6), 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, J. (2014). Bringing HR and finance together with analytics. Workforce Solutions Review, 5(2), 11–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holsapple, C. W., & Lee‐Post, A. (2006). Defining, assessing, and promoting e‐learning success: An information systems perspective. Decision sciences journal of innovative education, 4(1), 67–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, K. (2016). Vigillo expands data mining, analysis beyond CSA. Fleet Owner Exclusive Insight, 1, 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones-Schenk, J. (2017). Data: Big and small. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 48(7), 60–61. https://doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20170119-04.

  • Kearsley, G. (1983). Instructional videodisc. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 34(6), 417–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manyika, J., Chui, M., Brown, B., Bughin, J., Dobbs, R., Roxburgh, C., & Hung Byers, A. (2011). Big data: The next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity. Retrieved from http://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/digital-mckinsey/our-insights/big-data-the-next-frontier-for-innovation

  • Marker, A. (2007). Synchronized analysis model: Linking Gilbert's behavior engineering model with environmental analysis models. Performance Improvement, 46(1), 26–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mneney, J., & Van Belle, J.-P. (2016, January). Big data capabilities and readiness of South African retail organisations. Paper presented at the 2016 6th international conference – cloud system and big data engineering (Confluence), Noida, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, C. (2005). Measuring effectiveness with learning analytics. Chief Learning Officer, 4(5), 34–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nam, D.-W., Kang, D., & Kim, S. H. (2015). Process of big data analysis adoption: Defining big data as a new is innovation and examining factors affecting the process. Paper presented at the 48th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, HICSS 2015, January 5, 2015 - January 8, 2015, Kauai, HI, United States.

    Google Scholar 

  • New Republic. (2014, July 7). How big data can improve people practices and policies. Retrieved from http://newrepublic.com/article/118570/how-big-data-can-improve-people-practices-and-policies

  • Nilashi, M., Ahmadi, H., Ahani, A., Ravangard, R., & Ibrahim, O. B. (2016). Determining the importance of hospital information system adoption factors using fuzzy analytic network process (anp). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 111, 244–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.07.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Leonard, K. (2012). Mind the global skills gap. Chief Learning Officer, 11(8), 50–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine, N. (2015). Game changers for learning. Training Journal, 52(3), 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Razmi, J., Sangari, M. S., & Ghodsi, R. (2009). Developing a practical framework for ERP readiness assessment using fuzzy analytic network process. Advances in Engineering Software, 40(11), 1168–1178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivera, R. J. (2007). How to demonstrate value: Key measures every learning professional should know. In WLP scorecard: Why learning matters (pp. 17–24). Alexandria, VA: ASTD Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell, W. (2000). ASTD models for human performance improvement: Roles, competencies, and outputs (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: The American Society for Training and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siadatya, M., Gašević, D., & Hatala, M. (2016a). Associations between technological scaffolding and micro-level processes of self-regulated learning: A workplace study. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 1007–1019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siadatya, M., Gašević, D., & Hatala, M. (2016b). Measuring the impact of technological scaffolding interventions on micro-level processes of self-regulated workplace learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 469–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • SHRM Foundation. (2016, May). Use of workforce analytics for competitive advantage. Retrieved from https://www.shrm.org/foundation/ourwork/initiatives/preparing-for-future-hr-trends/Documents/Workforce%20Analytics%20Report.pdf

  • Succi, C., & Cantoni, L. (2008). A map of eLearning acceptance (MeLA) and a corporate eLearning readiness index (CeLeRI). International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning (iJAC), 1(1), 39–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tayal, S. P. (2013). Engineering design process. International Journal of Computer Science and Communication Engineering, 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tornatzky, L. G., Fleischer, M., & Chakrabarti, A. K. (1990). Processes of technological innovation. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toterhi, T. (2014). Make sure big data adds up. Training Magazine, 51(4), 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Tiem, D., Moseley, J. L., & Dessinger, J. C. (2012). Fundamentals of performance improvement: Optimizing results through people, process, and organizations. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villachica, S. W., & Stepich, D. A. (2010). Surviving troubled times: Five best practices for training professionals. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 23(2), 93–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yawson, R. M. (2012). Systems theory and thinking as a foundational theory in human resource development—A myth or reality? Human Resource Development Review, 12(1), 53–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yusof, M. M., Kuljis, J., Papazafeiropoulou, A., & Stergioulas, L. K. (2008). An evaluation framework for health information systems: Human, organization and technology-fit factors (hot-fit). International Journal of Medical Informatics, 77(6), 386–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.08.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, K. (2015, October). Intelligent analytics. Training Journal, 2015, 56–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, N., Zhao, X., Zhang, Z., Meng, Q., & Tan, H. (2017). What factors drive open innovation in China's public sector? A case study of official document exchange via microblogging (odem) in Haining. Government Information Quarterly, 34(1), 126–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa A. Giacumo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Potential Big Data Readiness Factors

Appendix: Potential Big Data Readiness Factors

1.1 Sources

1. Tornatzky et al. (1990)

2. Giacumo and Villachica (2016)

3. Alkhater et al. (2015)

4. Nam et al. (2015)

5. Mneney and Van Belle (2016)

6. Nilashi et al. (2016)

7. Alam et al. (2016)

8. Alkhalil et al. (2017)

9. Zhang et al. (2017)

Factors

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

TOE innovation

         

Technology context (internal and external technologies relevant to the firm)

         

Quality of service/availability

X

 

X

      

Quality of service/reliability

  

X

      

Security

  

X

  

X

   

Privacy

  

X

      

Trust

  

X

      

Relative advantage

  

X

X

X

X

X

X

 

Compatibility

  

X

  

X

X

X

 

Complexity

  

X

 

X

X

X

X

 

Trialability

  

X

    

X

 

Risks

       

X

 

Size (data volume)

       

X

 

IT infrastructure (networking, software and database resources, speedy internet, backup plan)

    

X

 

X

 

X

IT access

 

X

      

X

Knowledge about big data

    

X

    

Current internal methods and equipment

X

        

Pool of available external technologies

X

        

Features of the technology

X

        

Organization context

         

Top management support

  

X

 

X

X

X

X

X

Firm size

X

 

X

  

X

   

Technology readiness

  

X

      

Readiness

       

X

 

Internal social network

       

X

 

Informal linkages between employees

X

        

Transactions carried out through internal employee linkages (decision-making and internal communication)

X

        

External social network

X

      

X

 

Centralization of management structure

X

     

X

  

Formalization of management structure

X

     

X

  

Formalization of task division and coordination

X

        

Complexity of management structure

X

        

Top management leadership behaviors

X

        

Formal boundary-spanning structures

X

        

Perceived cost

      

X

  

Organization structure

        

X

Release procedures of official documents

        

X

Department objectives

        

X

IS infrastructure

     

X

   

Financial resources

   

X

X

X

   

Quality of human resources

X

   

X

    

Amount of internally available slack resources

X

        

Governance

    

X

    

External environmental context

         

Government regulation

X

 

X

  

X

   

Competitive pressure

X

 

X

X

X

X

X

  

Physical location

  

X

      

External support

  

X

      

Industry

X

 

X

 

X

    

Technology vendor support

    

X

X

X

  

Government regulations and support

X

   

X

 

X

  

Attitude of local social environment

        

X

Attitude of local social environment toward government transparency

        

X

Intensity of competition

     

X

   

Access to resources supplied by others

X

        

Industry characteristics and market structure (firm size, customer-supplier relations, market uncertainty/volatility, dimensions of competition, industry life cycle)

X

        

Technology support infrastructure (labor costs, skill of labor force, access to suppliers)

X

        

Human context

         

Culture

  

X

 

X

    

Job satisfaction (salary, promotion, organizational loyalty, organizational affiliation)

         

Senior executive innovativeness (enthusiastic to experiment, not timid to try out new info systems, sooner create something new, often risk doing things differently)

     

X

X

  

IT staff capabilities (possess skills, computer literate, at least one computer expert in HRD Department)

   

X

 

X

X

 

X

Employee’s IS knowledge

     

X

   

CIO innovativeness

     

X

   

Clinical IT experts

     

X

   

Consult data for all decisions (executives, managers, supervisors)

 

X

       

Financials list people as assets—In addition to expenses

 

X

       

Business analysts have shifted attention from managing to developing performance

 

X

       

Data analysts are highly skilled and interested in big data

 

X

       

HR and L&D are valued strategic partners

 

X

       

HR and L&D are fluent in metrics and scorecards

 

X

       

Task-technology fit

         

Big data use cases

    

X

    

Adoption

         

Initialization

   

X

     

Adoption

   

X

     

Assimilation

   

X

     

Partners

         

Executives

 

X

       

Financials

 

X

       

Managers

 

X

       

Supervisors

 

X

       

Business analysts

 

X

       

HR/L&D

 

X

       

Users

 

X

       

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Giacumo, L.A., Villachica, S.W., Breman, J. (2018). Workplace Learning, Big Data, and Organizational Readiness: Where to Start?. In: Ifenthaler, D. (eds) Digital Workplace Learning. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46215-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46215-8_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-46214-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-46215-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics