Abstract
There is a growing need for professionals who are able to analyze large data sets to inform business decisions. Evidence for this need is presented through examples of big data and analytics used to inform and assess informal and formal workplace learning initiatives, embeding big data within a performance improvement (PI) framework, and delivering an emerging organizational readiness model. If big data and analytics could address these needs, then the organizational readiness for this potential solution can be determined. Thus, the authors conclude by describing an emerging model of big data readiness in organizations and its implications for determining readiness. Recommendations for other future research are also provided.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alam, G. R., Masum, A. K., Beh, L.-S., & Hong, C. S. (2016). Critical factors influencing decision to adopt human resource information system (HRIS) in hospitals. PLoS One, 11(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160366
Alkhalil, A., Sahandi, R., & John, D. (2017). An exploration of the determinants for decision to migrate existing resources to cloud computing using an integrated toe-doi model. Journal of Cloud Computing, 6(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13677-016-0072-x
Alkhater, N., Wills, G., & Walters, R. (2015). Factors affecting an organisation's decision to adopt cloud services in Saudi Arabia. Paper presented at the 3rd international conference on future Internet of things and cloud, FiCloud 2015, August 24, 2015–August 26, 2015, Rome, Italy.
Aron, D., Waller, G., & Weldon, L. (2015). Flipping to digital leadership: The 2015 CIO Agenda (Executive Summary).
Berk, J., & Magee, S. (2005). Technological considerations in learning analytics. Chief Learning Officer, 4(7), 42–45.
Chevalier, R. (2003). Updating the behavior engineering model. Performance Improvement, 42(5), 8–14.
Chyung, S. Y. (2008). Foundations of instructional and performance technology. Amherst, MA: HRD Press.
Coyle, T. J. (2016). L&D delivery system needs. Training, 53(6), 24.
De Laat, M. F., & Schreurs, B. (2011). Network awareness tool: Social software for visualizing, analysing and managing social networks. Heerlen: Ruud de Moor Centrum, Open Universiteit Nederland.
Dolezalek, H. (2003). Measure for measure. Training, 40(11), 72.
Dutton, G. (2014). What’s the big deal about big data? Training Magazine, 51(2), 16–19.
Everson, K. (2015). Leave learning to employees. Chief Learning Officer, 14(11), 30–33.
Foshay, W. R., Villachica, S. W., & Stepich, D. A. (2014). Cousins but not twins: Instructional design and human performance technology in the workplace. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 39–49). New York, NY: Springer.
Gandomi, A., & Haider, M. (2015). Beyond the hype: Big data concepts, methods, and analytics. International Journal of Information Management, 35(2), 137–144..
Giacumo, L. A., & Breman, J. (2016). Emerging evidence of the use of big data and learning analytics in workplace learning: A systematic literature review. Quarterly Review Distance Education, 17, 21–38.
Giacumo, L. A., Breman, J., & Villachica, S. W. (2016, October). Big data and analytics for big wins: Environmental cues, readiness indicators, and select analytics applications for improving workplace performance. Poster presented at the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Las Vegas, NV.
Giacumo, L. A., & Villachica, S. W. (2016, September). Big data meets performance improvement: Separating promise from hype. Paper presented at the Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) conference of the International Society for Performance Improvement, Bonn, Germany.
Gilbert, T. F. (1978). Human competence: Engineering worthy performance. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 213–236. https://doi.org/10.2307/249689
Hagel, J. (2012). Executives turn data into internal insight. Journal of Accountancy, 213(5), 26–27.
Hall, B. (2013). Will big data equal big learning? Chief Learning Officer, 12(3), 16.
Hanafizadeh, P., & Ravasan, A. Z. (2011). A McKinsey 7S model-based framework for ERP readiness assessment. International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems, 7(4), 23–63. https://doi.org/10.4018/jeis.2011100103
Haney, B. D. (2002). Assessing organizational readiness for E‐learning: 70 questions to ask. Performance Improvement, 41(4), 10–15.
Harless, J. H. (1987). An analysis of front-end analysis. Performance + Instruction, 26(2), 7–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.4160260204
Hartley, D. (2004). A love-hate thing. T+D, 58(6), 20.
Higgins, J. (2014). Bringing HR and finance together with analytics. Workforce Solutions Review, 5(2), 11–13.
Holsapple, C. W., & Lee‐Post, A. (2006). Defining, assessing, and promoting e‐learning success: An information systems perspective. Decision sciences journal of innovative education, 4(1), 67–85.
Jones, K. (2016). Vigillo expands data mining, analysis beyond CSA. Fleet Owner Exclusive Insight, 1, 1–2.
Jones-Schenk, J. (2017). Data: Big and small. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 48(7), 60–61. https://doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20170119-04.
Kearsley, G. (1983). Instructional videodisc. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 34(6), 417–423.
Manyika, J., Chui, M., Brown, B., Bughin, J., Dobbs, R., Roxburgh, C., & Hung Byers, A. (2011). Big data: The next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity. Retrieved from http://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/digital-mckinsey/our-insights/big-data-the-next-frontier-for-innovation
Marker, A. (2007). Synchronized analysis model: Linking Gilbert's behavior engineering model with environmental analysis models. Performance Improvement, 46(1), 26–32.
Mneney, J., & Van Belle, J.-P. (2016, January). Big data capabilities and readiness of South African retail organisations. Paper presented at the 2016 6th international conference – cloud system and big data engineering (Confluence), Noida, India.
Moore, C. (2005). Measuring effectiveness with learning analytics. Chief Learning Officer, 4(5), 34–39.
Nam, D.-W., Kang, D., & Kim, S. H. (2015). Process of big data analysis adoption: Defining big data as a new is innovation and examining factors affecting the process. Paper presented at the 48th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, HICSS 2015, January 5, 2015 - January 8, 2015, Kauai, HI, United States.
New Republic. (2014, July 7). How big data can improve people practices and policies. Retrieved from http://newrepublic.com/article/118570/how-big-data-can-improve-people-practices-and-policies
Nilashi, M., Ahmadi, H., Ahani, A., Ravangard, R., & Ibrahim, O. B. (2016). Determining the importance of hospital information system adoption factors using fuzzy analytic network process (anp). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 111, 244–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.07.008
O'Leonard, K. (2012). Mind the global skills gap. Chief Learning Officer, 11(8), 50–52.
Paine, N. (2015). Game changers for learning. Training Journal, 52(3), 17.
Razmi, J., Sangari, M. S., & Ghodsi, R. (2009). Developing a practical framework for ERP readiness assessment using fuzzy analytic network process. Advances in Engineering Software, 40(11), 1168–1178.
Rivera, R. J. (2007). How to demonstrate value: Key measures every learning professional should know. In WLP scorecard: Why learning matters (pp. 17–24). Alexandria, VA: ASTD Press.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
Rothwell, W. (2000). ASTD models for human performance improvement: Roles, competencies, and outputs (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: The American Society for Training and Development.
Siadatya, M., Gašević, D., & Hatala, M. (2016a). Associations between technological scaffolding and micro-level processes of self-regulated learning: A workplace study. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 1007–1019.
Siadatya, M., Gašević, D., & Hatala, M. (2016b). Measuring the impact of technological scaffolding interventions on micro-level processes of self-regulated workplace learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 469–482.
SHRM Foundation. (2016, May). Use of workforce analytics for competitive advantage. Retrieved from https://www.shrm.org/foundation/ourwork/initiatives/preparing-for-future-hr-trends/Documents/Workforce%20Analytics%20Report.pdf
Succi, C., & Cantoni, L. (2008). A map of eLearning acceptance (MeLA) and a corporate eLearning readiness index (CeLeRI). International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning (iJAC), 1(1), 39–47.
Tayal, S. P. (2013). Engineering design process. International Journal of Computer Science and Communication Engineering, 1–5.
Tornatzky, L. G., Fleischer, M., & Chakrabarti, A. K. (1990). Processes of technological innovation. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Toterhi, T. (2014). Make sure big data adds up. Training Magazine, 51(4), 14.
Van Tiem, D., Moseley, J. L., & Dessinger, J. C. (2012). Fundamentals of performance improvement: Optimizing results through people, process, and organizations. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
Villachica, S. W., & Stepich, D. A. (2010). Surviving troubled times: Five best practices for training professionals. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 23(2), 93–115.
Yawson, R. M. (2012). Systems theory and thinking as a foundational theory in human resource development—A myth or reality? Human Resource Development Review, 12(1), 53–85.
Yusof, M. M., Kuljis, J., Papazafeiropoulou, A., & Stergioulas, L. K. (2008). An evaluation framework for health information systems: Human, organization and technology-fit factors (hot-fit). International Journal of Medical Informatics, 77(6), 386–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.08.011
Young, K. (2015, October). Intelligent analytics. Training Journal, 2015, 56–59.
Zhang, N., Zhao, X., Zhang, Z., Meng, Q., & Tan, H. (2017). What factors drive open innovation in China's public sector? A case study of official document exchange via microblogging (odem) in Haining. Government Information Quarterly, 34(1), 126–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.11.002
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix: Potential Big Data Readiness Factors
Appendix: Potential Big Data Readiness Factors
1.1 Sources
Factors | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TOE innovation | |||||||||
Technology context (internal and external technologies relevant to the firm) | |||||||||
Quality of service/availability | X | X | |||||||
Quality of service/reliability | X | ||||||||
Security | X | X | |||||||
Privacy | X | ||||||||
Trust | X | ||||||||
Relative advantage | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||
Compatibility | X | X | X | X | |||||
Complexity | X | X | X | X | X | ||||
Trialability | X | X | |||||||
Risks | X | ||||||||
Size (data volume) | X | ||||||||
IT infrastructure (networking, software and database resources, speedy internet, backup plan) | X | X | X | ||||||
IT access | X | X | |||||||
Knowledge about big data | X | ||||||||
Current internal methods and equipment | X | ||||||||
Pool of available external technologies | X | ||||||||
Features of the technology | X | ||||||||
Organization context | |||||||||
Top management support | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||
Firm size | X | X | X | ||||||
Technology readiness | X | ||||||||
Readiness | X | ||||||||
Internal social network | X | ||||||||
Informal linkages between employees | X | ||||||||
Transactions carried out through internal employee linkages (decision-making and internal communication) | X | ||||||||
External social network | X | X | |||||||
Centralization of management structure | X | X | |||||||
Formalization of management structure | X | X | |||||||
Formalization of task division and coordination | X | ||||||||
Complexity of management structure | X | ||||||||
Top management leadership behaviors | X | ||||||||
Formal boundary-spanning structures | X | ||||||||
Perceived cost | X | ||||||||
Organization structure | X | ||||||||
Release procedures of official documents | X | ||||||||
Department objectives | X | ||||||||
IS infrastructure | X | ||||||||
Financial resources | X | X | X | ||||||
Quality of human resources | X | X | |||||||
Amount of internally available slack resources | X | ||||||||
Governance | X | ||||||||
External environmental context | |||||||||
Government regulation | X | X | X | ||||||
Competitive pressure | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||
Physical location | X | ||||||||
External support | X | ||||||||
Industry | X | X | X | ||||||
Technology vendor support | X | X | X | ||||||
Government regulations and support | X | X | X | ||||||
Attitude of local social environment | X | ||||||||
Attitude of local social environment toward government transparency | X | ||||||||
Intensity of competition | X | ||||||||
Access to resources supplied by others | X | ||||||||
Industry characteristics and market structure (firm size, customer-supplier relations, market uncertainty/volatility, dimensions of competition, industry life cycle) | X | ||||||||
Technology support infrastructure (labor costs, skill of labor force, access to suppliers) | X | ||||||||
Human context | |||||||||
Culture | X | X | |||||||
Job satisfaction (salary, promotion, organizational loyalty, organizational affiliation) | |||||||||
Senior executive innovativeness (enthusiastic to experiment, not timid to try out new info systems, sooner create something new, often risk doing things differently) | X | X | |||||||
IT staff capabilities (possess skills, computer literate, at least one computer expert in HRD Department) | X | X | X | X | |||||
Employee’s IS knowledge | X | ||||||||
CIO innovativeness | X | ||||||||
Clinical IT experts | X | ||||||||
Consult data for all decisions (executives, managers, supervisors) | X | ||||||||
Financials list people as assets—In addition to expenses | X | ||||||||
Business analysts have shifted attention from managing to developing performance | X | ||||||||
Data analysts are highly skilled and interested in big data | X | ||||||||
HR and L&D are valued strategic partners | X | ||||||||
HR and L&D are fluent in metrics and scorecards | X | ||||||||
Task-technology fit | |||||||||
Big data use cases | X | ||||||||
Adoption | |||||||||
Initialization | X | ||||||||
Adoption | X | ||||||||
Assimilation | X | ||||||||
Partners | |||||||||
Executives | X | ||||||||
Financials | X | ||||||||
Managers | X | ||||||||
Supervisors | X | ||||||||
Business analysts | X | ||||||||
HR/L&D | X | ||||||||
Users | X |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Giacumo, L.A., Villachica, S.W., Breman, J. (2018). Workplace Learning, Big Data, and Organizational Readiness: Where to Start?. In: Ifenthaler, D. (eds) Digital Workplace Learning. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46215-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46215-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-46214-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-46215-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)