Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of Policy Decision-Making on Riparian Corridors in a Semi-arid Desert: A Modeling Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Complex Societal, Environmental and Engineered Systems

Part of the book series: Nonlinear Systems and Complexity ((NSCH,volume 18))

  • 546 Accesses

Abstract

The resilience of ecologically significant landscapes is often hindered by traditional approaches to natural resource management, which treat ecologic, hydrologic, and social systems as distinct entities. Although acknowledging interdependencies is a great first step in managing complex systems, challenges exist in predicting effects of intervention due to key features such as non-linearity and uncertainty. In order to project the impact of urban populations on riparian corridors in a semi-arid desert, we integrated several modeling approaches to simulate how policy decision-making will effect riparian vegetation along the Upper San Pedro River. Policy decision-making was characterized with a Bayesian Belief Network, allowing uncertainty in the decision-making process to be incorporated. Policy decisions ultimately effected population growth and water use. Urban water demand, calculated by multiplying urban population size with per capita water consumption, was used in conjunction with response functions, developed from MODFLOW, to simulate changes in depth-to-groundwater by well pumping in a spatially-explicit agent-based model. Depth-to-groundwater was then used as an indicator of unique vegetation guilds within the riparian corridor. The model was used to test the effects of policy decision-making on the spatial distribution of riparian vegetation along the Upper San Pedro River. By using the model as a tool, decision-makers may have the ability to make better-informed decisions to ensure the resilience of the Upper San Pedro Watershed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arias, H. (2000). International groundwaters: The Upper San Pedro Basin case. Natural Resources Journal, 40, 199–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arizona Water Company. (2007). Sierra Vista water plan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R. (1976). Structure of decision: The cognitive maps of political elites. Chichester: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (2003). Navigating social-ecological systems. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierwagen, B., Thomas, J., Pyke, C., Theobald, D., Choate, A., Cohen, J., et al. (2009). Land-use scenarios: National-scale housing-density scenarios consistent with climate change storylines. Environmental Protection.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromely, J., Jackson, N., Giacomello, A.-M., & Bradford, R. J. (2002). Participatory development of Bayesian networks as an aid to integrated water resource planning. Proceedings of the International Conference on Policies and Tools for Sustainable Water Management in the European Union. Venice, November 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, I. S., Kepner, W. G., Sidman, G. S., Goodrich, D. C., & Guertin, D. P. (2013) Assessing hydrologic impacts of future land cover change scenarios in the San Pedro River (US/Mexico). US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, J. (2001). Planning improvements in natural resources management. Guidelines for using Bayesian networks to manage development projects. Wallingford, UK: Institute of Hydrology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dellinger, E., Varady, R., & Browning-Aiken, A. (2006). Water policy research on the Upper San Pedro Basin: An annotated bibliography of contributions by the Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy, 1997–2006. Tucson, AZ: Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy, University of Arizona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C., Ackermann, F., & Cropper, S. (1992). The analysis of cause maps. Journal of Management Studies, 29, 309–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsawah, S., Guillaume, J. H. A., Filatova, T., Rook, J., & Jakeman, A. J. (2014). A methodology for eliciting, representing, and analyzing stakeholder knowledge for decision making on complex socio-ecological systems: From cognitive maps to agent-based models. Journal of Environmental Management, 151, 500–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ESRI. (2011). ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulton, E. A., Smith, A. D. M., Smith, D. C., & van Putten, I. E. (2010). Human behavior: The key source of uncertainty in fisheries management. Fish and Fisheries, 12, 2–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GeNIe. (2013). Decision Systems Laboratory, University of Pittsburgh. Retrieved from http://genie.sis.pitt.edu/.

  • Giordano, R., Preziosi, E., & Romano, E. (2010). An integration between cognitive map and Bayesian belief network for conflicts analysis in drought management. Proceedings of the International Congress on Environmental Modeling and Software. Ottawa, July 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goode, T. C., & Maddock, T., III. (2000). Simulation of groundwater conditions in the Upper San Pedro Basin for the evaluation of alternative futures. Tucson, AZ: Department of Hydrology and Water Resources (HWR-00-030), University of Arizona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grantham, C. (1997). Assessment of the ecological impacts of ground water overdraft on wetlands and riparian areas in the United States. NASA (19980000183).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, L. H., Allen, C. R., & Holling, C. S. (Eds.). (2010). Foundations of ecological resilience. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G. S., Cosgrov, D. M., & Spinazola, J. (1998). Use of MODFLOW for development of response function. Proceedings, MODFLOW 98 Conference. Golden, CO: Colorado School of Mines.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmerer, B., Mishra, S., & Shenoy, P. (2002). Bayesian causal maps as decision aids in venture capital decision making: Methods and applications. Proceedings of the Academy of Management Conference. August 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keshvari, S., van den Berg, R., & Ma, W. (2012). Probablistic computation in human perception under variability in encoding precision. PLoS One, 7, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lite, S. J., & Stromberg, J. C. (2005). Surface water and ground-water thresholds for maintaining Populus–Salix forests, San Pedro River, Arizona. Biological Conservation, 125(2), 153–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcot, B., Steventon, J., Sutherland, G., & McCann, R. (2006). Guidelines for developing and updating Bayesian belief networks applied to ecological modeling and conservation. Canadian Journal of Forest Resources, 36, 3063–3074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milly, P. C. D., Betancourt, J., Falkenmark, M., Hirsch, R. M., Kundzewicz, Z. W., Lettenmaier, D. P., et al. (2008). Stationarity is dead. Whither water management? Science, 319, 573–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olmstead, S. M., Hanemann, W. M., & Stavins, R. N. (2007). Water demand under alternative price structures. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 54(2), 181–198.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl, C. (2007). Transitions towards adaptive management of water facing climate and global change. Journal Water Resources Management, 21(1), 49–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl, C., Jeffrey, P., Isendahl, N., & Brugnach, M. (2011). Maturing the new water management paradigm: Progressing from aspiration to practice. Water Resource Management, 25, 837–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl, C., Kabat, P., & Moltgen, J. (2008). Adaptive and integrated water management. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pool, D. R., & Dickinson, J. E. (2007). Ground-water flow model of the Sierra Vista subwatershed and Sonoran portions of the upper San Pedro basin, southeastern Arizona, United States, and northern Sonora, Mexico (No. 2006-5228). Geological Survey (US).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rijke, J., Brown, R., Zevenbergen, C., Ashley, R., Farrelly, M., Morison, P., et al. (2012). Fit-for-purpose governance: A framework to make adaptive governance operational. Environmental Science and Policy, 22, 73–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer, M., & Westley, F. R. (2007). The evolutionary basis of rigidity: Locks in cells, minds, and society. Ecology and Society, 12(2), 36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlüter, M., McAllister, R., Arlinghaus, R., Bunnefeld, N., Eisenack, K., Hölker, F., et al. (2012). New horizons for managing the environment: A review of coupled social-ecological systems modeling. Natural Resource Modeling, 25, 219–272.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, C. A., Meza, F. J., Varady, R. G., Holm, T., Jamie, M. E., Garfin, G. M., et al. (2013). Water security and adaptive management in the arid Americas. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103, 280–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedki, K., & de Beaufort, L. (2012). Cognitive maps and Bayesian networks for knowledge representation and reasoning. 24th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence. Greece.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, P. R., Comrie, A. C., Packin, G. D., Angersbach, K., & Hughes, M. K. (2002). The climate of the US Southwest. Climate Research, 21, 219–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sierra Vista Department of Public Works. (2014). Area water use. Environmental Services Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiegelhalter, D., Dawid, A., Lauritzen, S., & Cowell, R. (1993). Bayesian analysis in expert systems. Statistical Science, 8, 219–247.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Steinitz, C., Rojo, H., Basset, S., Flazman, M., Goode, T., Maddock, T., III, et al. (2003). Alternative futures for changing landscapes: The Upper San Pedro River Basin in Arizona and Sonora. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, E. (1948). Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological Review, 55, 189e208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuan, Y. F. (1962). Structure, climate, and basin land forms in Arizona and New Mexico. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 52(1), 51–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2010, April 1). State and county Quickfacts: Arizona. Retrieved December 10, 2013, from http://quickfacts.census.gov.

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2009). Land-use scenarios: National-scale housing-density scenarios consistent with climate change storylines (Final Report). Washington, DC: Global Change Research Program, National Center for Environmental Assessment. EPA/600/R-08/076F. Retrieved from National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA, and http://www.epa/gov/ncea.

  • Varady, R. G., Scott, C. A., Wilder, M., Morehouse, B., Pineda Pablos, N., & Garfin, G. M. (2013). Transboundary adaptive management to reduce climate change vulnerability in the western U.S.–Mexico border region. Environmental Science and Policy, 26, 102–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B., Carpenter, S., Anderies, J., Abel, N., Cumming, G. S., Janssen, M., et al. (2002). Resilience management in social-ecological systems. A working hypothesis for a participatory approach. Conservation Ecology, 6, 14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilensky, U. (1999). NetLogo. Evanston, IL: Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University. Retrieved from http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the staff, students, and PIs of The University of Arizona and University of Copenhagen working on the “Strengthening the Resilience of Arid Regions Riparian Corridors” project. We particularly thank Christopher Horstman for help in developing the hydrological submodel. This research was sponsored by grant 1010495 of the National Science Foundation and the Water Sustainability Program Student Fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Natural Resources and the Environment, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA

    Aloah Pope & Randy Gimblett

Authors
  1. Aloah Pope
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Randy Gimblett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aloah Pope .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Ibn Zohr University, Agadir, Morocco

    Mohamed Nemiche

  2. ENSIAS College of Engineering, Mohamed V University of Rabat, Rabat, Morocco

    Mohammad Essaaidi

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pope, A., Gimblett, R. (2017). Effects of Policy Decision-Making on Riparian Corridors in a Semi-arid Desert: A Modeling Approach. In: Nemiche, M., Essaaidi, M. (eds) Advances in Complex Societal, Environmental and Engineered Systems. Nonlinear Systems and Complexity, vol 18. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46164-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46164-9_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-46163-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-46164-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation