Abstract
This chapter examines how a new methodological approach, peer observation of research, was used as part of a comparative, ethnographic study of social resilience in Alaska and Siberia. The approach evolved through the collaboration of two indigenous researchers working in two different regions of the Arctic. Breaking from what has become a standard auto-ethnographic or self-reflexive enterprise in anthropology, our study aimed to document the collaborative ethnographic interaction from multiple perspectives and positions. We present two fieldwork episodes demonstrating the process and potential utility of a peer observation method for social researchers working in collaboration with indigenous communities and people in the Arctic. Peer observation of research reveals: (1) the ways in which our methods and models of collaborative research are relational and negotiated within an indigenous community and cultural context and (2) the degree to which our own indigenous kinship and association influences our ethnographic outcomes in a fieldwork setting leading to productive points of orientation and disorientation.
A Malemut shaman from Kotzebue sound near Selawik lake told me that a great chief lives in the moon who is visited now and then by shamans who always go to him two at a time, as one man is ashamed to go alone… (Nelson 1900: 515)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Yup’ik (pl. Yupiit) are the indigenous inhabitants of southwest and southcentral Alaska and parts of eastern Siberia . Yup’ik is part of the Inuit language family and the Yup’ik speaking peoples are traditional hunters and gatherers who would move on a seasonal round with a primary focus on salmon, sea mammals and tundra flora and fauna.
- 2.
The term ‘indigenous’ has been widely used in reference to all sorts of people, including dominant European nations interchangeably and has no straightforward and clear-cut definition. Here, we use the term ‘indigenous’ in reference to the endogenous populations of a particular geographic region, such as the Arctic, who have experienced colonial and de-colonial occupation and oppression by a dominant population.
- 3.
The Eveny are an Asiatic numerically-small people that number around 17,000 and speak a Tungus-Manchu language. Most Eveny live in northern Siberia and engage in a double economy that combines reindeer herding and hunting.
- 4.
We thank our knowledgable Eveny elder, Vasilii Spiridonovich Keimetinov-Bargachan for informing us on the concept of nyamnin.
References
Akpik, F., & Bodenhorn, B. (2000). Pilgallasiniq Ivalupianik—Learning to braid ‘real’ thread. Barrow: Illisagvik College.
Bateson, G. (1958). Naven: A survey of the problems suggested by a composite picture of the culture of a New Guinea tribe drawn from three points of view. San Francisco: Stanford University Press.
Bodenhorn, B. (2012). Meeting minds; encountering worlds: Sciences and other expertises on the North Slope of Alaska. In M. Konrad (Ed.), Collaborators collaborating: Counterparts in anthropological knowledge and international research relations (pp. 225–244). Oxford: Berghahn Books.
Briggs, J. (1970). Never in anger: Portrait of an Eskimo family. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Brody, H. (2001). The other side of Eden: Hunters, farmers and the shaping of the world. New York: North Point Press.
Brown, S. (2015). White Eskimo: Knud Rasmussen’s fearless journey into the heart of the Arctic. Boston: De Capo Press.
Cole, D. (1986). Franz Boas in Baffin-Land: The great anthropologist began his career with arctic explorations and hardships. The Beaver: Exploring Canada’s History, 66, 4–15.
Collings, P. (2014). Becoming Inummarik: Men’s lives in an Inuit community. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y. S., & Smith, L. T. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Duranti, A. (2010). Husserl, intersubjectivity and anthropology. Anthropological Theory, 10(1), 1–20.
Fast, P. (2002). Northern Athabaskan survival: Women, community and the future. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Fienup-Riordan, A. (2007). Yuungnaqpiallerput. The way we genuinely live: masterworks of Yup’ik science and survival. Seattle/London: University of Washington Press.
Fluehr-Lobban, C. (Ed.). (2003). Ethics and profession of Anthropology: Dialogue for ethically conscious practice. New York: Alta Mira Press.
Fullerton, H. (1999). Observation of teaching. In H. Fry, S. Ketteridge, & S. Marshall (Eds.), A handbook for teaching and learning in higher education. London: Kogan Page.
Galman, S. C. (2007). Shane, The lone ethnographer: A beginner’s guide to Ethnography. New York: AltaMira Press.
Hammersley-Fletcher, L., & Orsmond, P. (2005). Reflecting on reflective practices within peer observation. Studies in Higher Education, 30(2), 213–24.
Humphrey, C., with Onon, U. (1996). Shamans and elders: Experience, knowledge and power among the Daur Mongols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Konrad, M. (Ed.). (2012). Collaborators collaborating: counterparts in anthropological knowledge and international research relations. Oxford: Berghan Books.
Kovach, M. (2009). Indigenous methodologies: Characteristics, conversations, and contexts. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Krupnik, I. (2012). The 50-year arctic career of Ernest S. Burch, Jr.: A personal ethnohistory, 1960–2010. Arctic Anthropology, 49(2), 10–28.
Kuznar, L. (1996). Reclaiming a scientific anthropology (Cambridge cultural social studies). New York: AltaMira Press.
Lassiter, L. E. (2005). The Chicago guide to collaborative ethnography. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.
LeCompte, M., & Schensul, J. (2010). Designing and conducting ethnographic research (Ethnographer’s toolkit 2nd ed.). New York: AltaMira Press.
Lowe, C. (2012). Recognizing scholarly subjects in the politics of nature: Problematizing collaboration in Southeast Asian area studies. In M. Konrad (Ed.), Collaborators collaborating: Counterparts in anthropological knowledge and international research relations (pp. 245–268). Oxford: Berghahn Books.
Marcus, G., & Mascarenhas, F. (2005). Ocasião: The marquis and the anthropologist: a collaboration. Walnut Creek: Altamira Press.
Medicine, B., & Jacobs, S. E. (2001). Learning to be an anthropologist and remaining “Native”: Selected writings. Ubana: University of Illinois Press.
Mohatt, G. V., Rasmus, S. M., Thomas, L. R., Hazel, K., Allen, J., & Hensel, C. (2004). “Tied together like a woven hat:” Protective pathways to sobriety for Alaska Natives. Harm Reduction Journal, 1(10). http://harmreductionjournal.com/content/1/1/10.
Muller-Wille, L., & Barr, W. (1998). Franz Boas among the Inuit of Baffin Island, 1883–1884: Journals and letters. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, Scholarly Publishing Division.
Mutua, K., & Swaderner, B. B. (Eds.). (2004). Decolonizing research in cross-cultural contexts: Critical personal narratives. Albany: SUNY Press.
Nagy, M. (2008). Sex, lies and northern explorations: Recent books on Peary, MacMillan, Stefansson, Wilkins and Flaherty. Etudes Inuit Studies, 32(2), 169–185.
Nelson, E. W. (1900). The Eskimos about Bering Strait. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Pálsson, G. (2001). Writing on ice: The ethnographic notebooks of Vilhjalmur Stefansson. Hanover: Dartmouth College Press.
Rasmus, S. M. (2014). Indigenizing CBPR: Evaluation of a community-based participatory research process implementation of the Elluam Tungiinun (Towards Wellness) program in Alaska. American Journal of Community Psychology, 54(1–2), 170–179.
Rasmus, S. M., Allen, J., & Ford, T. (2014a). “Where I have to learn the ways how to live”: Youth resilience in a Yup’ik village in Alaska. Transcultural Psychiatry, 51(5), 713–734.
Rasmus, S. M., Charles, B., & Mohatt, G. V. (2014b). Creating Qungasvik (a Yup’ik toolbox): Case examples from a community-developed and culturally-driven intervention. American Journal of Community Psychology, 54(1–2), 140–152.
Seale, C., Gobo, G., Gubrium, J. F., & Silverman, D. (Eds.). (2004). Qualitative research practice. London: Sage.
Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. New York: Zed Books Ltd.
Smith, L. T. (2005). On tricky ground: Researching the Native in the age of uncertainty. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 85–108). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.
Stefansson, V. (1971). My life with the Eskimo. New York: Collier Books.
Strathern, M. (2012). Currencies of collaboration. In M. Konrad (Ed.), Collaborators collaborating: Counterparts in anthropological knowledge and international research relations (pp. 109–119). Oxford: Berghahn Books.
Sumsion, J. (2014). Opening up possibilities through team research: An investigation of infants’ lives in early childhood education settings. Qualitative Research, 14, 149–165.
Tresch, J. (2001). On going Native: Thomas Kuhn and anthropological method. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 31, 302–322.
Ulturgasheva, O. (2012). Narrating the future in Siberia: Childhood, adolescence and autobiography among Eveny. Oxford: Berghahn Books.
Ulturgasheva, O. (2013). Schastlivoye budusheye antiutopiyi postsotsializma [Happy futures in Post-Socialist anti-utopia]. In N. Ssorin-Chaikov (Ed.), Topografiya schastya: Ethnograficheskye karty moderna (pp. 219–33). Moscow: Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie.
Ulturgasheva, O. (2014). Attaining Khinem: Challenges, coping strategies and resilience among Eveny adolescents. Transcultural Psychiatry, 51, 632–650.
Ulturgasheva, O. (2016). Spirit of the Future: Movement, kinetic distribution and personhood among Siberian Eveny. Social Analysis, 60(1), 56–73.
Ulturgasheva, O., Grotti, V. & Brightman, M. (2010). Personhood and ‘frontier’ in contemporary Amazonia and Siberia. In Laboratorium. Russian review of social research. Thematic issue: “Russia/CIS/Latin America: Comparative Studies in Post-Authoritarian Transformation”, 2(3), 348–365.
Ulturgasheva, O., Wexler, L., Kral, M., Allen, J., Mohatt, G. V., & Nystad, K. (2011). Navigating international, interdisciplinary, collaborative inquiry: Phase 1 process in the Circumpolar Indigenous Pathways to Adulthood Project. Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarship, 4(1), 50–59.
Ulturgasheva, O., Rasmus, S., Wexler, L., Nystad, K., & Kral, M. (2014). Arctic Indigenous youth resilience and vulnerability: Comparative analysis of adolescent experiences and resilience strategies across five arctic indigenous communities. Transcultural Psychiatry, 51, 735–756.
Ulturgasheva, O., Rasmus, S., & Morrow, P. (2015). Collapsing the distance: Indigenous youth engagement in a circumpolar study of study of youth resilience. Arctic Anthropology, 52(1), 50–60.
Williamson, K. J. (2011). Inherit my heaven: Kalaallit gender relations. Inussuk Arctic Journal 1. Nuuk: Department of Culture, Education, Research and Church, Government of Greenland.
Wilson, S. (2008). Research is ceremony. Winnipeg: Fernwood Publishing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rasmus, S., Ulturgasheva, O. (2017). From Lone Wolves to Relational Reindeer: Revealing Anthropological Myths and Methods in the Arctic. In: Fondahl, G., Wilson, G. (eds) Northern Sustainabilities: Understanding and Addressing Change in the Circumpolar World. Springer Polar Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46150-2_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46150-2_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-46148-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-46150-2
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)