Abstract
This chapter shows how the provision and integration of water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) education in schools, through institutional partnerships, participatory approaches and whole-school development (WSD), can bring about significant gains in improving learning environments and learner achievement. The chapter focuses on the US Agency for International Development (USAID)-funded WASH in school programme – Schools Promoting Learning Achievement Through Sanitation and Hygiene (SPLASH) in Zambia. SPLASH is a 4-year project involving over 616 schools and reaching 250,000 learners. The implementation of SPLASH in Zambia demonstrates that adequate and improved WASH facilities improve teacher-pupil contact time as well as enrolment and attendance, especially for adolescent girls as a result of improved menstrual hygiene management. However, this can only be possible through institutional partnerships, participatory approaches and whole-school development.
The authors worked for the SPLASH project. They write in their personal capacity to reflect on the project in the context of improving quality of education through partnerships, participation and whole-school development.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Propaganda is a term for communication that is aimed at achieving people’s uncritical agreement with certain messages.
References
Barrow, E., & Murphree, M. (2001). Community conservation: From concept to practice. In D. Hulme & M. Murphree (Eds.), African wildlife and livelihoods: The promise and performance of community conservation. Oxford: James Currey.
Bresee, S., Lupele, J., & Freeman, M. (2014). Children as agents of change for WASH in rural Zambia. Atlanta, GA: Emory University.
Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (2001). Participation: The new tyranny? London: Zed.
Duran-Narucki, V. (2008). School building conditions, school attendance and academic achievement in New York City Schools: A Meditational Model. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28, 278–286.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Seabury Press.
Jasper, T., Lee, T., & Bartram, J. (2012). Water and sanitation in schools: A systematic review of the health and educational outcomes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 9(8), 2772–2787.
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research planner (3rd ed.). Geelong, Australia: Deakin University Press.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lupele, J. (2002). Ambivalent globalising influences in a local context: The case of an environmental education practitioner’s experience in Zambia. In E. Janse van Rensburg, J. Hattingh, H. Lotz- Sisitka, & R. O’Donoghue (Eds.), Environmental education, ethics and action in Southern Africa: EEASA Monograph. Pretoria, South Africa: Human Resources Research Council.
McKernan, J. (1991). Curriculum action research: A handbook of methods and resources for the reflective practitioner. London: Kogan.
Ministry of Education (MOE). (1996). Educating our future. Lusaka, Zambia: Ministry of Education.
Ministry of Education (MOE). (2010). School-based continuing professional development through lesson study. Lusaka, Zambia: Ministry of Education/Japan International Cooperation Agency.
Ministry of Finance (MOF). (2011). Sixth National Development Plan. Republic of Zambia.
MLGH. (2006). Natural water supply and sanitation programme. Lusaka, Zambia: Ministry of Local Government and Housing.
National Food and Nutrition Commission. (2015). Retrieved from http://www.nwasco.org.zm/index.php/news.
Parker, J., & Adler, S. (2013). Module 2 study guide: Values and participation in EfS – from local to global: Distance learning centre. London: South Bank University.
Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organisation. New York: Doubleday.
Shallcross, T., Loubser, C., Le Roux, C., O Donoghue, R., Lupele, J. (2006). Promoting sustainable development through whole school approaches: An international, intercultural teacher education research and development. Journal of Education for Teaching, 32(3), 301.
SPLASH. (2012). Programme implementation plan. Washington, DC: WASHplus.
SPLASH. (2015). SPLASH school outcome study: The effect of WASH in schools on educational outcomes: Absenteeism and teacher-pupil contact time. Washington, DC: WASHplus.
Taalat, M., et al. (2011). Effects of hand hygiene campaigns on incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza and absenteeism in schoolchildren, Cairo, Egypt. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 4, 619–625.
UNEP. (1992). Agenda 21. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: UNCED.
USAID Water and Development Strategy 2013–2018. Retrieved from http://www.usaid.gov/sites/default/files/documents/1865/USAID_Water_Strategy_3.pdf.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lupele, J., Kakuwa, B., Banda, R. (2017). Improving the Quality of Education Through Partnerships, Participation and Whole-School Development: A Case of the WASH Project in Zambia. In: Lotz-Sisitka, H., Shumba, O., Lupele, J., Wilmot, D. (eds) Schooling for Sustainable Development in Africa. Schooling for Sustainable Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45989-9_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45989-9_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45987-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45989-9
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)