Abstract
This chapter notes that while theoretically, increasing the money supply (“accommodating monetary policy”) should prevent crowd out effects, this study did not find that changing the M1 money supply alleviated crowd out. The chapter offers the hypothesis (untested) it may be because the Federal Reserve’s principal method of increasing the M1 money supply mechanically funnels the money principally to investors selling securities so as to be able to buy other securities (which generally does not affect the GDP), not to the general population, who would be more likely to use it to buy real goods and services, stimulating the GDP.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsAuthor information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Heim, J.J. (2017). Alternatives to Financing Stimulus Programs with Domestic Borrowing. In: Crowding Out Fiscal Stimulus. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45967-7_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45967-7_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45966-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45967-7
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)