Advertisement

Ecological Dynamics: A Theoretical Framework for Understanding Sport Performance, Physical Education and Physical Activity

  • Ludovic SeifertEmail author
  • Keith Davids
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Complexity book series (SPCOM)

Abstract

This paper focuses on the role of ecological dynamics as a theoretical framework for analysing performance of athletes and sports teams as complex adaptive systems. It combines key concepts from ecological psychology and nonlinear dynamical system theory, seeking to enhance understanding of performance and learning contexts in sport, to aid the acquisition and transfer of adaptive human behaviours. In ecological psychology the continuous regulation of human behaviour is predicated on the role of information that emerges from the individual–environment system to guide activity. The information sources that constrain performance behaviours are affordances, which provide invitations for action offered by each individual’s perception of functional relations with a performance environment. This information-based approach has been enhanced with the integration of tools and concepts from nonlinear dynamics to explain how information is cyclically related to the dynamics of a performance environment. Dynamical systems theory addresses the emergence of coordination tendencies that exist between and within components and levels of complex neurobiological systems. Ecological dynamics identifies key properties of expertise in sport predicated on the performer–environment relationship as the appropriate scale of analysis. This paper introduces the key properties of expert movement systems that include multi- and meta-stability, the functional role of adaptive movement variability, redundancy, degeneracy and the attunement to affordances. Additionally, we discuss the concept of representative design, which in an ecological dynamics framework underpins the organisation of experimental and learning environments so that observations and acquired skills can be linked to emergent functional behaviours in a specific performance context.

Keywords

Coordination dynamics Adaptive variability of movement Affordances Representative design 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This project received the funding of the CPER/GRR Logistic Mobility Numeric XTerm.

References

  1. 1.
    Kugler PN, Kelso JAS, Turvey MT (1980) On the concept of coordinative structures as dissipative structures: I. Theoretical lines of convergence. Adv Psychol 1:3–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Davids K, Hristovski R, Araújo D, Balague Serre N, Button C, Passos P (2014) Complex systems in sport. Routledge (Taylor and Francis Group), LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Davids K, Araújo D, Hristovski R, Passos P, Chow JY (2012) Ecological dynamics and motor learning design in sport. In: Hodges NJ, Williams AM (eds) Skill acquisition in sport: research, theory and practice. Routledge (Taylor and Francis Group), New York, pp 112–130Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Davids K, Button C, Bennett SJ (2008) Dynamics of skill acquisition: a constraints-led approach. Human Kinetics, ChampaignGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Araújo D, Davids K, Hristovski R (2006) The ecological dynamics of decision making in sport. Psychol Sport Exerc 7:653–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gibson J (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin, BostonGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Davids K, Araújo D (2010) The concept of ‘organismic asymmetry’ in sport science. J Sports Sci 13:633–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Withagen R, de Poel HJ, Araújo D, Pepping G-J (2012) Affordances can invite behavior: reconsidering the relationship between affordances and agency. New Ideas Psychol 30:250–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Warren WH (2006) The dynamics of perception and action. Psychol Rev 113:358–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kelso JAS (1995) Dynamic patterns: the self-organization of brain and behavior. MIT, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jantzen KJ, Oullier O, Kelso JAS (2008) Neuroimaging coordination dynamics in the sport sciences. Methods 45:325–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zanone PG, Kostrubiec V (2004) Searching for (dynamic) principles of learning. In: Jirsa VK, Kelso JAS (eds) Coordination dynamics: issues and trends. Springer, Berlin, pp 58–89Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Prigogine I, Stengers I (1979) La nouvelle alliance [the new alliance]. Gallimard, ParisGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Haken H (1983) Synergetics: an introduction: nonequilibrium phase transition and self-organization in physics, chemistry, and biology. Springer, BerlinzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Prigogine I (1994) Les lois du chaos. Flammarion, ParisGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Newell K (1986) Constraints on the development of coordination. In: Wade M, Whiting H (eds) Motor development in children: aspects of coordination. Martinus Nijhoff, Amsterdam, pp 341–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Seifert L, Button C, Davids K (2013) Key properties of expert movement systems in sport: an ecological dynamics perspective. Sports Med 43:167–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kelso JAS (2012) Multistability and metastability: understanding dynamic coordination in the brain. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 367:906–918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Davids K, Bennett SJ, Newell KM (2006) Movement system variability. Human Kinetics, ChampaignGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Newell KM, Corcos DM (1993) Variability and motor control. Human Kinetics, ChampaignGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Edelman GM, Gally JA (2001) Degeneracy and complexity in biological systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci. U S A 98:13763–13768Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mason PH (2010) Degeneracy at multiple levels of complexity. Biol Theory 5:277–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Whitacre JM (2010) Degeneracy: a link between evolvability, robustness and complexity in biological systems. Theor Biol Med Modell 7:6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Price CJ, Friston KJ (2002) Degeneracy and cognitive anatomy. Trends Cognit Sci 6:416–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fajen BR, Riley MR, Turvey MT (2009) Information, affordances, and the control of action in sport. Int J Sport Psychol 40:79–107Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chow JY, Davids K, Hristovski R, Araújo D, Passos P (2011) Nonlinear pedagogy: learning design for self-organizing neurobiological systems. New Ideas Psychol 29:189–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Seifert L, Davids K (2012) Intentions perceptions and actions constrain functional intra- and inter-individual variability in the acquisition of expertise in individual sports. Open Sports Sci J 5:68–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Davids K, Glazier PS, Araújo D, Bartlett RM (2003) Movement systems as dynamical systems: the functional role of variability and its implications for sports medicine. Sports Med 33:245–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Glazier PS, Davids K (2009) On analysing and interpreting variability in motor output. J Sci Med Sport 12:e2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hristovski R, Davids K, Araújo D, Button C (2006) Hox boxers decide to punch a target: emergent behaviour in nonlinear dynamical movement systems. J Sci Med Sport 5:60–73Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pinder RA, Davids K, Renshaw I (2012) Metastability and emergent performance of dynamic interceptive actions. J Sci Med Sport 15(5):437–443Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Seifert L, Komar J, Barbosa T, Toussaint H, Millet G, Davids K (2014) Coordination pattern variability provides functional adaptations to constraints in swimming performance. Sports Med 44:1333–1345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Vilar L, Araújo D, Davids K, Button C (2012) The role of ecological dynamics in analysing performance in team sports. Sports Med 42:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Brunswik E (1956) Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments. University of California, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pinder RA, Davids K, Renshaw I, Araújo D (2011) Representative learning design and functionality of research and practice in sport. J Sport Exerc Psychol 33:146–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Issurin V (2013) Training transfer: scientific background and insights for practical application. Sports Med 43:675–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rosalie S, Müller S (2012) A model for the transfer of perceptual-motor skill learning in human behaviors. Res Q Exerc Sport 83:413–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zanone PG, Kelso JAS (1997) Coordination dynamics of learning and transfer: collective and component levels. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 23:1454–1480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Seifert L, Wattebled L, L’Hermette M, Bideault G, Herault R, Davids K (2013) Skill transfer, affordances and dexterity in different climbing environments. Hum Mov Sci 32:1339–1352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Bruineberg J, Rietveld E (2014) Self-organization, free energy minimization, and optimal grip on a field of affordances. Front Hum Neurosci 8:599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Scarantino A (2003) Affordances explained. Philos Sci 70:949–961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Turvey M, Shaw R (1999) Ecological foundations of cognition I: symmetry and specificity of animal–environment systems. J Conscious Stud 65:95–110Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Passos P, Araújo D, Davids K, Gouveia L, Serpa S, Milho J, Fonseca S (2009) Interpersonal pattern dynamics and adaptive behavior in multiagent neurobiological systems: conceptual model and data. J Mot Behav 41:445–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Passos P, Milho J, Fonseca S, Borges J, Araújo D, Davids K (2011) Interpersonal distance regulates functional grouping tendencies of agents in team sports. J Mot Behav 43:155–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Boschker MSJ, Bakker FC, Michaels CF (2002) Memory for the functional characteristics of climbing walls: perceiving affordances. J Mot Behav 34:25–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Seifert L, Orth D, Hérault R, Davids K (2013) Affordances and grasping patterns variability during rock climbing. In: Davis T, Passos P, Dicks M, Weast-Knapp J (eds) Studies in perception and action XII: seventeenth international conference on perception and action. Psychology Press, Taylor & Francis, Estoril, Portugal, pp 114–118Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Jacobs DM, Michaels CF (2007) Direct learning. Ecol Psychol 19:321–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Tucker R, Collins M (2012) What makes champions? A review of the relative contribution of genes and training to sporting success. Br J Sports Med 46:555–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Hambrick D, Oswald F, Altmann E, Meinz E, Gobet F, Campitelli G (2014) Deliberate practice: is that all it takes to become an expert? Intelligence 45:34–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Chow JY, Davids K, Button C, Shuttleworth R, Renshaw I, Araújo D (2007) The role of nonlinear pedagogy in physical education. Rev Educ Res 77:251–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Chow JY, Davids K, Button C, Shuttleworth R, Renshaw I, Araújo D (2006) Nonlinear pedagogy: a constraints-led framework for understanding emergence of game play and movement skills. Nonlinear Dyn Psychol Life Sci 10:71–103Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CETAPS - EA 3832, Faculty of Sport SciencesUniversity of RouenRouenFrance
  2. 2.Centre for Sports Engineering ResearchSheffield Hallam UniversitySheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations