Frontal Systems as Mechanisms of Fish Aggregation

  • Alberto BaudenaEmail author
  • Francesco d’Ovidio
  • Guido Boffetta
  • Silvia De Monte
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Complexity book series (SPCOM)


In contrast to terrestrial environments, the open ocean has a dynamics whose timescales overlap with the demography of the organisms it hosts. In particular, the so-called meso- and submesoscale processes (1–100 km, days to weeks) have been shown to play a key role in structuring the distribution of phytoplankton, which forms the large majority of the base of the trophic chain (d’Ovidio et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(43):18366–18370). However, how the (sub)mesoscale turbulence affects higher trophic levels, which have typically swimming capabilities, is largely not known. Here we explore the capability of frontal system to aggregate swimming organisms (fish) by analyzing an idealized model of the stretching region which is often found in between mesoscale vortices. The rationale behind this approach is that an optimal niche for fish, defined in terms of physical properties or prey availability, may shrink with time under the coupled effect of stretching and diffusion. If the shrinking speed is less than the fish swimming capability, fish schools originally dispersed over a wide region may move inside a smaller area, and therefore increase their local density. The model is parameterized for one of the most abundant mesopelagic fish, the myctophid (Irigoien et al., Nat Commun 5:1–10), particularly important in the Southern Ocean, using physical conditions representative of their environment.


Southern Ocean Swimming Speed Unstable Manifold Frontal System Trophic Chain 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Cotté C, d’Ovidio F, Dragon A-C, Guinet C, Lévy M (2015) Flexible preference of southern elephant seals for distinct mesoscale features within the antarctic circumpolar current. Prog Oceanogr 131:46–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    d’Ovidio F, De Monte S, Alvain S, Dandonneau Y, Lévy M (2010) Fluid dynamical niches of phytoplankton types. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(43):18366–18370ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Godø OR, Samuelsen A, Macaulay GJ, Patel R, Hjøllo SS, Horne J, Kaartvedt S, Johannessen JA (2012) Mesoscale eddies are oases for higher trophic marine life. PLoS ONE 7(1):e30161, 01Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Irigoien X, Klevjer TA, Røstad A, Martinez U, Boyra G, Acuña JL, Bode A, Echevarria F, Gonzalez-Gordillo JI, Hernandez-Leon S et al (2014) Large mesopelagic fishes biomass and trophic efficiency in the open ocean. Nat Commun 5:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Smetacek V (2012) Making sense of ocean biota: how evolution and biodiversity of land organisms differ from that of the plankton. J Biosci 37(4):589–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alberto Baudena
    • 1
    Email author
  • Francesco d’Ovidio
    • 1
  • Guido Boffetta
    • 1
  • Silvia De Monte
    • 1
  1. 1.Locean - Université Pierre et Marie CURIEParisFrance

Personalised recommendations