Advertisement

Physico-chemical Analysis of Ceramic Material Systems: From Macro- to Nanostate

  • Vladimir Ya. ShevchenkoEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Hot Topics in Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry book series (HTTC, volume 11)

Abstract

The historical aspects of ceramic production, as well as the modern approaches to the technical side of ceramic production, especially solgel technology as the path to modern nanotechnologies, are discussed. It is pointed out that the most essential significance of the nanostate for the applied sciences lies in the possibility of merging the inorganic, organic, and biological worlds, thus creating a prodigious number of new materials.

Keywords

Nobel Prize Winner Coherent Interface Hydraulic Lime Classical Crystallography Petrie Polygon 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Shevchenko VYa (1993) Introduction to technical ceramics. Nauka, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vandiver P, Kingery W (1986) Egyptian faience: the first high-tech ceramic. In: High-technology ceramics: past, present, and future. American Ceramic Society, pp 19–34Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Freestone IM (1986) Title refractories in the ancient and preindustrial world. In: High-technology ceramics: past, present, and future. American Ceramic Society, pp 35–65Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lechtman HN, Hobbs LW (1986) Roman concrete and the roman architectural revolution. In: High-technology ceramics: past, present, and future. American Ceramic Society, pp 81–128Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gao-Zhen L, Ling-Xiang G (1986) Development of Chinese celadon and its influences. In: High-technology ceramics: past, present, and future. American Ceramic Society, pp 129–152Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kingery W (1986) The Development of the European Porcelain. In: High-technology ceramics: past, present, and future. American Ceramic Society, pp 153–180Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lomonosov M (1951) Working log 1751. In: Research in physics and chemistry. USSR Academy of Sciences, p 372Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ebelmen JJ (1846) Annals 57:331Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Graham T (1864) J Chem Soc 17:318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mendeleev DI (1860) Khim Zh 4:65Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brinker CJ, Sherer GW (1990) The physics and chemistry of sol-gel processing. Academic Press, Inc., Am Imprint of Elsevier, 908 pGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mackenzie JD (2003) Sol-gel research achievements since 1981 and prospects for future. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 26:23–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Marchi M, Megri RM, Bilmes SA (2003) Photophysical methods for the study of sol-gel transition and structure of titania gels. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 26:131–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shevchenko VY, Madison AE, Shudegov VE (2003) Fragmentariness and metamorphoses of nanostructures. Fiz Khim Stekla 29(6): 809–816 (Glass Phys Chem (Engl transl), (2003) 29(6):583–588]Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shevchenko VY, Madison AE, Shudegov VE (2003) The structural diversity of the nanoworld. Fiz Khim Stekla 29(6):801–808 (Glass Phys Chem (Engl transl), 2003 29(6):577–582)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bernal JD, Carlisle CH (1968) Range of generalized crystallography. Kristallografiya 13(5):927–951Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ishimasa T, Kaneko Y, Kaneko H (2004) New group of stable icosahedral quasicrystals: structural properties and formation conditions. J Non-Cryst Solids 1–7:334–335Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bragg W, Claringbull GF (1965) Crystal structures of minerals. Bell, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Colomer J-F, Henrard L, van Tendeloo G, Lucas A, Lambin P (2004) Study of the packing of double-walled carbon nanotubes onto bundles by transmission electron microscopy and electron diffraction. J Mater Sci 14(4):603–606Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sadoc JF, Rivier N (1999) Boerdijk-Coxeter Helix and biological helices. Eur Phys J 12:309–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Socolar JES, Steinhardt PJ (1986) Quasicrystals: II. Unit-cell configurations. Phys Rev B: Condens Matter 34(2):617–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Locher JL (ed) (2000) Escher: the complete graphic work. Thames and Hudson Ltd., London, 349 pGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Anderson S, Wadsley AD (1966) Nature (London) 211:581–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fére YG, Mellot-Draznieks C, Loiseau T (2003) Real, virtual, and not yet discovered porous structures using scale chemistry and/or simulation: a tribute to Sten Anderson. Solid State Sci 5(1):79–94Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bendersky LA, Gayle FW (2001) Electron diffraction using transmission electron microscopy. J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol 106(6):997–1012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Withers RL (2003) An analytical solution for the zero frequency hyperbolic RUM modes of distortion of SiO2—Tridymite. Solid State Sci 5(1):115–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shevchenko VY, Khasanov OL, Madison AE, Lee JY (2002) Investigation of the structure of zirconia nanoparticles by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy. Fiz Khim Stekla 28(5):459–464 (Glass Phys Chem (Engl transl), 2002 28(5):322–325)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Alok Singh, Tsai AP (2003) On the cubic W phase and its relationship to the Icosahedral Phase in Mg–Zn–Y Alloys. Scr Mater 49(2):143–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Samoylovich MI, Shevchenko VY, Talis AL (2004) Structural diversity of the nanoworld and the algebraic geometry constructions. In: Nanotechnologies and photonic crystals. Tekhnomash, Kaluga, pp 174–194Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Silicate Chemistry of Russian Academy of SciencesSaint-PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations