Advertisement

Equivalence of the Arrhenius and Non-Arrhenian Temperature Functions in the Temperature Range of Measurement and Its Application in Isoconversional Kinetics

  • Peter ŠimonEmail author
  • Tibor Dubaj
  • Zuzana Cibulková
Chapter
Part of the Hot Topics in Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry book series (HTTC, volume 11)

Abstract

It is shown that the kinetic data can be equivalently described in the temperature range of measurement by the Arrhenius, Harcourt–Esson and Berthelot–Hood temperature functions. The reason is that, in a narrow temperature range, 1/T, ln T and T are linearly related to each other. Therefore, the kinetic parameters obtained from one function can be recalculated to the parameters from another one. This equivalence holds for the incremental and differential isoconversional methods only; due to their mathematical incorrectness, the equivalence does not take place for the integral isoconversional methods. It is reasoned that the temperature functions are equivalent not only in the case of the isoconversional methods, but also for the model-fitting methods. An incremental isoconversional method without any approximations or transformations of the experimental data and with a statistically well-grounded and physically justified objective function based on the maximum likelihood approach is mentioned.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Research and Development Operational Programme project “University Science Park of STU Bratislava”, ITMS 26240220084, co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund. The financial support from the Slovak Scientific Grant Agency, grant No. VEGA 1/0592/15, is acknowledged.

References

  1. 1.
    Šimon P (2005) Considerations on the single-step kinetics approximation. J Therm Anal Calorim 82:651–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Šimon P (2007) The single-step approximation: attributes, strong and weak sides. J Therm Anal Calorim 88:709–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vyazovkin S, Burnham AK, Criado JM, Pérez-Maqueda LA, Popescu C, Sbirrazzuoli N (2011) ICTAC kinetics committee recommendations for performing kinetic computations on thermal analysis data. Thermochim Acta 520:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Šimon P (2004) Isoconversional methods—fundamentals, meaning and application. J Therm Anal Calorim 76:123–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Šimon P, Thomas P, Dubaj T, Cibulková Z, Peller A, Veverka M (2014) The mathematical incorrectness of the integral isoconversional methods in case of variable activation energy and the consequences. J Therm Anal Calorim 115:853–859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dubaj T, Cibulková Z, Šimon P (2015) An incremental isoconversional method for kinetic analysis based on the orthogonal distance regression. J Comput Chem 36:392–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Simon P, Dubaj T, Cibulkova Z (2015) Equivalence of the Arrhenius and non-Arrhenian temperature functions in the temperature range of measurement. J Therm Anal Calorim 120:231–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Laidler KJ (1984) The development of the Arrhenius equation. J Chem Educ 61:494–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dollimore D, Lerdkanchanaporn S, Alexander KS (1996) The use of the Harcourt and Esson relationship in interpreting the kinetics of rising temperature solid state decompositions and its application to pharmaceutical formulations. Thermochim Acta 290:73–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rodante F, Vecchio S, Catalani G, Guidotti M (2000) Thermal analysis and non-isothermal kinetic studies of some pesticides Part II: Chlorinate derivatives. J Therm Anal Calorim 60:605–622Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shih Y-F (2007) A study of the fiber obtained from the water bamboo husks. Biores Technol 98:819–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Maitra S, Bandyopadhyay N, Pal J (2008) Application of non-Arrhenius method for analyzing the decomposition kinetics of SrCO3 and BaCO3. J Am Ceram Soc 91:337–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chen H, Liu N (2008) Approximation expressions for the temperature integral. Progr Chem 20:1015–1020Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chen H, Liu N (2010) Application of non-Arrhenius equations in interpreting calcium carbonate decomposition kinetics: revisited. J Am Ceram Soc 93:548–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhao H, Yan H, Zhang C, Liu X, Xue Y, Qiao Y, Tian Y, Qin S (2011) Pyrolytic characteristics and kinetics of phragmites Australis Evid-Based Complement Altern Med Article, ID 408973. doi: 10.1155/2011/408973
  16. 16.
    Li Y-B, Zhao J-Z, Pu W-F, Peng H, Zhong D, Hu Z-W (2014) A method based on the Harcourt and Esson equation to estimate the catalytic effect of metallic additives on light crude oil. J Alloys Compounds 585:7–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dollimore D, Tong P, Alexander KS (1996) The kinetic interpretation of the decomposition of calcium carbonate by use of relationships other than the Arrhenius equation. Thermochim Acta 282–283:13–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gotor FJ, Criado JM (2002) The abuse of the Harcourt and Esson relationship in interpreting the kinetics of rising temperature solid state reactions. Thermochim Acta 383:53–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Šimon P, Hynek D, Malíková M, Cibulková Z (2008) Extrapolation of accelerated thermooxidative tests to lower temperatures applying non-Arrhenius temperature functions. J Therm Anal Calorim 93:817–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Šimon P (2009) Material stability predictions applying a new non-Arrhenian temperature function. J Therm Anal Calorim 97:391–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Chemical and Food TechnologyInstitute of Physical Chemistry and Chemical Physics, Slovak University of TechnologyBratislavaSlovakia

Personalised recommendations