Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Testing three techniques to elicit additive manufacturing knowledge

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Advances on Mechanics, Design Engineering and Manufacturing

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) has enabled the building of parts with new shapes and geometrical features. As this technology modifies the practices, new knowledge is required for designing and manufacturing properly. To help experts create and share this knowledge through formalization, our paper focusses on testing three knowledge elicitation techniques. After defining knowledge concepts we present the State of Art in knowledge elicitation and a methodology. A case study about support creation for AM points out: the assets and limits of the techniques; the different types of knowledge elements per technique; some contradictions between experts. We finally propose collective tools for a better elicitation and formalization of AM knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Markus LM. Toward a Theory of Knowledge Reuse: Types of Knowledge Reuse Situations and Factors in Reuse Success. J Manag Inf Syst, 2001,18:57–93

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gardan N. Knowledge Management for Topological Optimization Integration in Additive Manufacturing. Int J Manuf Eng, vol:2014

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wilson TD. The nonsense of knowledge management. Inf Res 2002, 8:paper 144

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nonaka I, Takeuchi H. The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation.Oxford University Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Polanyi M. The Tacit Dimension. London, Routledge & K. Paul, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mougin J, Boujut J-F, Pourroy F, Poussier G. Modelling knowledge transfer: A knowledge dynamics perspective. Concurrent Engineering, 2015, 23(4), 308-319.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cooke NJ. Varieties of knowledge elicitation techniques. Int J Hum-Comput Stud 1994, 41:801–49

    Google Scholar 

  8. Milton NR. Knowledge Acquisition in Practice: A Step-by-step Guide. Springer Science & Business Media, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stenzel I, Pourroy F. Integration of experimental and computational analysis in the product development and proposals for the sharing of technical knowledge. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf, 2008, 2(1), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. G-SCOP Laboratory, 46 Avenue Félix Viallet, 38031, Grenoble, France

    Christelle GRANDVALLET, Franck POURROY, Guy PRUDHOMME & Frédéric VIGNAT

Authors
  1. Christelle GRANDVALLET
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Franck POURROY
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Guy PRUDHOMME
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Frédéric VIGNAT
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christelle GRANDVALLET .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Université de Technologie de Compiègne , Compiègne, France

    Benoit Eynard

  2. Dip di Ingegneria Chimica, Gest,Info,Mec, Università degli Studi di Palermo Dip di Ingegneria Chimica, Gest,Info,Mec, Palermo, Italy

    Vincenzo Nigrelli

  3. Dip di Ing, Elet, e Elet, Inform (DIEEI), Università degli Studi di Catania Dip di Ing, Elet, e Elet, Inform (DIEEI), Catania, Italy

    Salvatore Massimo Oliveri

  4. Camino De Vera S/N, Universidad Politecnica de Valencia Camino De Vera S/N, Valencia, Spain

    Guillermo Peris-Fajarnes

  5. Dept of Mechanical Energy and Management, University of Calabria Dept of Mechanical Energy and Management, Rende (Cosenza), Italy

    Sergio Rizzuti

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

GRANDVALLET, C., POURROY, F., PRUDHOMME, G., VIGNAT, F. (2017). Testing three techniques to elicit additive manufacturing knowledge. In: Eynard, B., Nigrelli, V., Oliveri, S., Peris-Fajarnes, G., Rizzuti, S. (eds) Advances on Mechanics, Design Engineering and Manufacturing . Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45781-9_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45781-9_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45780-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45781-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation