Skip to main content

Comparative Study for the Metrological Characterization of Additive Manufacturing artefacts

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

Abstract

Additive Manufacturing (AM), also known as 3D printing, has been introduced since mid 90’ but it begins to have a broader use along last ten years. The first uses of AM process were for rapid prototyping or for 3D sample illustration due to the weak performances of mechanical characteristics of the materials available. However, even if this technology can provide answers for mechanical requirements, it will be largely used only if geometrical and dimensional characteristics of generated parts are also at the required level. In this context, it is necessary to investigate and identify any common dimensional and/or geometrical specifications of the parts generated by AM process. Highlighting singularity of AM systems should be based on the fabrication and measurement of standardized artefacts. Even if those test parts allow assessing some important characteristics of AM systems, there are still some challenges to characterize the capacity of generating freeform surfaces and features. In the literature, none of existing test parts are proposing those kind of features even if the generation of free-form surfaces is a significant benefit of AM systems. In this context, the aim of this paper is to provide a metrological comparative study on the capacity of an AM system to generate freeform parts based on an artefact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. M.N Islam, B Broswell, A.Pramanik, “An Investigation of Dimensional Accuracy of Parts Produced by Three-Dimensional Printing”, Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering 2013 Vol I, WCE 2013, July 3 - 5, 2013, London, U.K

    Google Scholar 

  2. P.F Jacobs, “Rapid prototyping and Manufacturing: Fundamentals of stereolithography”, Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Dearborn MI (1992)..

    Google Scholar 

  3. NIST “Measurement Science Roadmap for Metal-Based Additive Manufacturing”, Additive Manufacturing Final Report, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Moylan, J. Slotwinski, A. Cooke, K. Jurrens, M. A. Donmez, “Proposal for a Standardized Test Artefact for Additive Manufacturing Machines and Processes,” Proceeding of the Solid Free Form Fabrication Symposium, August 6-8 2012, Austin, Texas, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Li Yang, Md Ashabul Anam “An investigation of standard test part design for additive manufacturing”, Proceeding of the Solid Free Form Fabrication Symposium, Agust 2014, Austin, Texas, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M.N Islam, S. Sacks, “An experimental investigation into the dimensional error of powder-binder three-dimensional printing”, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, February 2016, Volume 82, Issue 5, pp 1371-1380

    Google Scholar 

  7. M B. McCarthy, S B. Brown; A. Evenden; A D. Robinson,” NPL freeform artefact for verification of non-contact measuring systems”,Proc. SPIE 7864, Three-Dimensional Imaging, Interaction, and Measurement, 78640K (27 January 2011); doi: 10.1117/12.876705

    Google Scholar 

  8. http://www.npl.co.uk/news/new-freeform-standards-to-support-scanning-cmms

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gibson I, Rosen D, Stucker B (2015) Additive manufacturing technologies, chapter 8. Binder jetting, 2nd ed. ISBN 978-1-4939-2112- 
6, New York: Springer Science and Business Media

    Google Scholar 

  10. 3D systems, Z printer 450, Technical specifications: http://www.zcorp.com/fr/Products/3D-Printers/ZPrinter-450/spage.aspx

    Google Scholar 

  11. https://www.rhino3d.com/fr/

    Google Scholar 

  12. Michalakis KX, Stratos A, Hirayama H, Pissiotis AL, Touloumi F (2009) Delayed setting and hygroscopic linear expansion of three gypsum products used for cast articulation. J Prosthet Dent 102(5): 313–318

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charyar MEHDI-SOUZANI .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

MEHDI-SOUZANI, C., PIRATELLI-FILHO, A., ANWER, N. (2017). Comparative Study for the Metrological Characterization of Additive Manufacturing artefacts. In: Eynard, B., Nigrelli, V., Oliveri, S., Peris-Fajarnes, G., Rizzuti, S. (eds) Advances on Mechanics, Design Engineering and Manufacturing . Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45781-9_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45781-9_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45780-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45781-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics