Abstract
In this paper, we propose a methodology to define a predictive model of complex systems’ quality. This methodology is based on a definition of system’s quality through factors and allows taking into account the specificities of the company. The model obtained with this methodology helps quality practitioners to have an objective view of system’s quality and predict the future quality of the system all along its lifecycle. This approach is illustrated through its application to design a model for compliance prediction, in an aeronautic and defense group, MBDA.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Fellows, R. and Liu, A.M.M. Managing organizational interfaces in engineering construction projects : addressing fragmentation and boundary issues across multiple interfaces. Construction Management and Economics, 2012, 30(8), pp. 653 – 671.
Hoegl, M. and Weinkauf, K. Managing Task Interdependencies in Multi-Team Projects : A Longitudinal Study. Journal of Management Studies, 2005, 42(6), pp. 1287 – 1308.
Oakland, J. S. TQM and operational excellence: text with cases, 2014 (Routledge)
Powell, T.C. Total quality management as competitive advantage: A review and empirical study. Strategic Management Journal, 1995, 16, pp. 15–37.
Söderlund, J. Pluralism in Project Management Navigating the Crossroads of Specialization and Fragmentation. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2011, 13, pp. 153–176.
Prajogo, D. and Sohal, A.S. TQM and innovation: a literature review and research framework. Technovation, 2001, 21(9), pp.539–558.
Cua, K.O., et al. Relationships between implementation of TQM, JIT, and TPM and manufacturing performance. Journal of Operations Management, 2001, 19, pp.675–694.
Tari, J.J. & Vicente, S. Quality tools and techniques: Are they necessary for quality management. International journal of Production Economics, 2004, 92(3), pp.267–280.
Kitchenham, B. Towards a constructive quality model Part I: Software quality modeling, measurement and prediction. Software Engineering Journal, 1987, 2(4).
Lead, C.M. et al. Systems Engineering Measurement Primer A Basic Introduction to Measurement Concepts and Use for Systems Engineering, 2010 (INCOSE).
Orlowski, C. et al. A Framework for Implementing Systems Engineering Leading Indicators for Technical Reviews and Audits. Computer Science, 2015, 61, pp.293–300.
Sauser, B.J. et al. A system maturity index for the systems engineering life cycle. Int. J. Industrial and Systems, 2008, 3(6), pp.673–691.
Zairi, M. Measuring performance for business results, 2012 (Springer).
Azizian, N. et al. A framework for evaluating technology readiness, system quality, and program performance of US DoD acquisitions. Systems Engineering, 2011,14(4), pp.410–426.
McCall, J.A., Richards, P.K. and Walters, G.F. Factors in Software Quality Concept and Definitions of Software Quality, 1977 (Rome air development center).
Ayyub, B.M. Elicitation of expert opinions for uncertainty and risk, 2001 (CRC Press).
Herrmann, J.W. Engineering Decision Making and Risk Management, 2015 (J.W. & Sons).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gitto, JP., Bosch-Mauchand, M., Ponchet Durupt, A., Cherfi, Z., Guivarch, I. (2017). Prevision of Complex System’s Compliance during System Lifecycle. In: Eynard, B., Nigrelli, V., Oliveri, S., Peris-Fajarnes, G., Rizzuti, S. (eds) Advances on Mechanics, Design Engineering and Manufacturing . Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45781-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45781-9_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45780-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45781-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)