Skip to main content

Prevision of Complex System’s Compliance during System Lifecycle

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances on Mechanics, Design Engineering and Manufacturing

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a methodology to define a predictive model of complex systems’ quality. This methodology is based on a definition of system’s quality through factors and allows taking into account the specificities of the company. The model obtained with this methodology helps quality practitioners to have an objective view of system’s quality and predict the future quality of the system all along its lifecycle. This approach is illustrated through its application to design a model for compliance prediction, in an aeronautic and defense group, MBDA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Fellows, R. and Liu, A.M.M. Managing organizational interfaces in engineering construction projects : addressing fragmentation and boundary issues across multiple interfaces. Construction Management and Economics, 2012, 30(8), pp. 653 – 671.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hoegl, M. and Weinkauf, K. Managing Task Interdependencies in Multi-Team Projects : A Longitudinal Study. Journal of Management Studies, 2005, 42(6), pp. 1287 – 1308.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Oakland, J. S. TQM and operational excellence: text with cases, 2014 (Routledge)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Powell, T.C. Total quality management as competitive advantage: A review and empirical study. Strategic Management Journal, 1995, 16, pp. 15–37.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Söderlund, J. Pluralism in Project Management Navigating the Crossroads of Specialization and Fragmentation. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2011, 13, pp. 153–176.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Prajogo, D. and Sohal, A.S. TQM and innovation: a literature review and research framework. Technovation, 2001, 21(9), pp.539–558.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cua, K.O., et al. Relationships between implementation of TQM, JIT, and TPM and manufacturing performance. Journal of Operations Management, 2001, 19, pp.675–694.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tari, J.J. & Vicente, S. Quality tools and techniques: Are they necessary for quality management. International journal of Production Economics, 2004, 92(3), pp.267–280.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kitchenham, B. Towards a constructive quality model Part I: Software quality modeling, measurement and prediction. Software Engineering Journal, 1987, 2(4).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lead, C.M. et al. Systems Engineering Measurement Primer A Basic Introduction to Measurement Concepts and Use for Systems Engineering, 2010 (INCOSE).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Orlowski, C. et al. A Framework for Implementing Systems Engineering Leading Indicators for Technical Reviews and Audits. Computer Science, 2015, 61, pp.293–300.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sauser, B.J. et al. A system maturity index for the systems engineering life cycle. Int. J. Industrial and Systems, 2008, 3(6), pp.673–691.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zairi, M. Measuring performance for business results, 2012 (Springer).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Azizian, N. et al. A framework for evaluating technology readiness, system quality, and program performance of US DoD acquisitions. Systems Engineering, 2011,14(4), pp.410–426.

    Google Scholar 

  15. McCall, J.A., Richards, P.K. and Walters, G.F. Factors in Software Quality Concept and Definitions of Software Quality, 1977 (Rome air development center).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ayyub, B.M. Elicitation of expert opinions for uncertainty and risk, 2001 (CRC Press).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Herrmann, J.W. Engineering Decision Making and Risk Management, 2015 (J.W. & Sons).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J-P. Gitto .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gitto, JP., Bosch-Mauchand, M., Ponchet Durupt, A., Cherfi, Z., Guivarch, I. (2017). Prevision of Complex System’s Compliance during System Lifecycle. In: Eynard, B., Nigrelli, V., Oliveri, S., Peris-Fajarnes, G., Rizzuti, S. (eds) Advances on Mechanics, Design Engineering and Manufacturing . Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45781-9_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45781-9_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45780-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45781-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics