Skip to main content

Introduction to Evidence-Based Decision-Making in the Multidisciplinary Management of the Natural Dentition

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Evidence-Based Decision Making in Dentistry

Abstract

The ultimate goal of conservative dental treatment is to preserve the natural dentition. In complicated cases where a complex multidisciplinary treatment approach may be required, serious dilemmas may rise, and possible further complications and tooth prognosis might be unpredictable. Application of evidence-based approaches in the multidisciplinary management of the natural dentition could result in reduction of mistakes in the clinical decision-making.

This book is aimed to provide dental practitioners with evidence-based knowledge and practical tools that may be incorporated in their daily practice. The principles of evidence-based decision-making in endodontology, periodontology and oral rehabilitation, as well as common clinical dilemmas such as the decision on whether to preserve a natural tooth or extract and replace it with an implant, and future trends in dentistry and how they may affect the clinical decision-making are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Tsesis I, Nemkowsky CE, Tamse E, Rosen E. Preserving the natural tooth versus extraction and implant placement: making a rational clinical decision. Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993). 2010;27(1):37–46, 75.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Iqbal MK, Kim S. A review of factors influencing treatment planning decisions of single-tooth implants versus preserving natural teeth with nonsurgical endodontic therapy. J Endod. 2008;34(5):519–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hofer TP, Kerr EA, Hayward RA. What is an error? Eff Clin Pract. 2000;3(6):261–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Angelos P. Complications, errors, and surgical ethics. World J Surg. 2009;33(4):609–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Corbella S, Del Fabbro M, Tamse A, Rosen E, Tsesis I, Taschieri S. Cone beam computed tomography for the diagnosis of vertical root fractures: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2014;118(5):593–602.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tsesis I. Complications in endodontic surgery: prevention, identification and management. Heidelberg: Springer; 2014.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Tsesis I, Faivishevsky V, Kfir A, Rosen E. Outcome of surgical endodontic treatment performed by a modern technique: a meta-analysis of literature. J Endod. 2009;35(11):1505–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tsesis I, Rosen E, Taschieri S, Telishevsky Strauss Y, Ceresoli V, Del Fabbro M. Outcomes of surgical endodontic treatment performed by a modern technique: an updated meta-analysis of the literature. J Endod. 2013;39(3):332–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. White SN, Miklus VG, Potter KS, Cho J, Ngan AY. Endodontics and implants, a catalog of therapeutic contrasts. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2006;6(1):101–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Woodmansey KF, Ayik M, Buschang PH, White CA, He J. Differences in masticatory function in patients with endodontically treated teeth and single-implant-supported prostheses: a pilot study. J Endod. 2009;35(1):10–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hannahan JP, Eleazer PD. Comparison of success of implants versus endodontically treated teeth. J Endod. 2008;34(11):1302–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Doyle SL, Hodges JS, Pesun IJ, Law AS, Bowles WR. Retrospective cross sectional comparison of initial nonsurgical endodontic treatment and single-tooth implants. J Endod. 2006;32(9):822–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Isaacs D, Fitzgerald D. Seven alternatives to evidence based medicine. BMJ. 1999;319(7225):1618.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Gutmann JL. Evidence-based/guest editorial. J Endod. 2009;35:1093.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mileman PA, van den Hout WB. Evidence-based diagnosis and clinical decision making. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2009;38(1):1–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rosenberg W, Donald A. Evidence based medicine: an approach to clinical problem-solving. BMJ. 1995;310(6987):1122–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Bossuyt PM, Leeflang MM. Chapter 6: developing criteria for including studies. In: Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy Version 0.4; 2008. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  18. Reitsma JB, Rutjes AWS, Whiting P, Vlassov VV, Leeflang MMG, Deeks JJ. Chapter 9: assessing methodological quality. In: Deeks JJ, Bossuyt PM, Gatsonis C, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of diagnostic Test Accuracy Version 1.0.0: the Cochrane Collaboration; 2009. Available from: http://srdta.cochrane.org/.

  19. Suebnukarn S, Ngamboonsirisingh S, Rattanabanlang A. A systematic evaluation of the quality of meta-analyses in endodontics. J Endod. 2010;36(4):602–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zwahlen M, Renehan A, Egger M. Meta-analysis in medical research: potentials and limitations. Urol Oncol. 2008;26(3):320–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sutherland SE, Matthews DC. Conducting systematic reviews and creating clinical practice guidelines in dentistry: lessons learned. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004;135(6):747–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Burns PB, Rohrich RJ, Chung KC. The levels of evidence and their role in evidence-based medicine. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128(1):305–10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. The periodic health examination. Canadian task force on the periodic health examination. Can Med Assoc J. 1979;121(9):1193–254.

    Google Scholar 

  24. The Oxford 2011 Levels of Evidence. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. http://www.cebm.net/ocebm-levels-of-evidence/.

  25. Rosen E, Taschieri S, Del Fabbro M, Beitlitum I, Tsesis I. The diagnostic efficacy of cone-beam computed tomography in endodontics: a systematic review and analysis by a hierarchical model of efficacy. J Endod. 2015;41(7):1008–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. European-Commission, editor. Radiation protection No 172 Cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial radiology - Evidence-based guidelines. A report prepared by the SEDENTEXCT project (www.sedentexct.eu). Luxembourg; 2012.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eyal Rosen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rosen, E., Nemcovsky, C.E., Tsesis, I. (2017). Introduction to Evidence-Based Decision-Making in the Multidisciplinary Management of the Natural Dentition. In: Rosen, E., Nemcovsky, C., Tsesis, I. (eds) Evidence-Based Decision Making in Dentistry. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45733-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45733-8_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45731-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45733-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics