Skip to main content

Are Euro Area Economic Structures Changing?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Euro and the Crisis

Part of the book series: Financial and Monetary Policy Studies ((FMPS,volume 43))

  • 1387 Accesses

Abstract

Euro area countries have exhibited modest convergence prior to the financial crisis, but have started to follow diverging paths thereafter. Such divergence has been examined from many angles, and diverse narratives of the crisis have developed. Surprisingly, the gradual transformation of economic structures of euro area countries over the last 15–20 years has instead received less attention. This chapter presents evidence of ongoing changes in the allocation of countries’ resources across sectors. Some of such changes even preceded the launch of the euro.

The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the ECB or the Eurosystem. We are responsible for any errors or omissions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Moreover, households, and to a lesser extent firms, took advantage of cheap and abundant liquidity (Fernández-Villaverde et al. 2013). When the euro area crisis hit, stressed euro area countries experienced “sudden stops” and there was financial fragmentation (Camba-Méndez et al. 2014). A “doom loop” ensued (Schambaugh 2012).

  2. 2.

    Today we know that the euro has been accompanied by more reciprocal trade between euro area countries (and with no “fortress Europe”). Estimates on the higher degree of openness range from a few percentage points to a more significant increase in intra-euro area trade.

  3. 3.

    Consequently, the borders of new currency unions could be drawn larger in expectation that trade integration and income correlation would augment once a currency union is created. For some qualifications see Wyplosz (2006), and Mongelli and Wyplosz (2008). Then, more recently these early findings were completely overturned when Glick and Rose (2015) re-run a new set of gravity models using a dataset including the euro and found no significant effect of currency union on trade.

  4. 4.

    For a survey of early EMU scepticism, see “It Can’t Happen, It’s a Bad Idea, It Won’t Last: U.S. Economists on the EMU and the Euro, 1989–2002” by Jonung and Drea (2010).

  5. 5.

    There is instead some early evidence of income convergence when looking at all EU 27 countries: i.e., when the faster growing new EU members are added, see ECB (2015).

  6. 6.

    In fact, economic growth is the combination of various additional factors such as demographics, capital endowment, human capital, natural resources, comparative advantages, a trained labour force that is able to work, and so on. Several of these factors are beyond the scope of this chapter.

  7. 7.

    Technically, the relation is the following: the sum of GVA-shares at current basic prices, plus taxes on goods and services, less subsidies on goods and services provides a measure of GDP at current market prices.

  8. 8.

    The opposite picture arises when we examine at the sale and rental of properties as captured by the Real Estate Sector share in GVA (see Annex). Spain, as well as Portugal and Ireland had lower shares than the other EA countries. An above average increase in the importance of this sector can be noted in Greece. Extreme developments in Greece and Ireland also drive the increasing coefficients of variation.

  9. 9.

    We regard Construction, Financial and Real estate services, as well as Public administration as not tradable. Classifying an entire sector as either tradable or non-tradable is a very crude measure.

References

  • Camba-Méndez G, Carbó-Valverde S, Rodriguez-Palenzuela D (2014) Financial reputation, market interventions and debt issuance by banks: a truncated two-part model approach. European Central Bank

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen R, Milesi-Ferretti MG-M, Tressel MT (2012) External imbalances in the Euro area. International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Coe DT, Helpman E (1995) International R&D spillovers. Eur Econ Rev 39(5):859–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constâncio V (2013) Establishing the single supervisory mechanism. Speech at the BAFT-IFSA 2013 Europe Bank-to-Bank Forum, 29 Jan 2013 (see ECB website)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorrucci E, Ioannou D, Mongelli FP, Terzi A (2015) The four Unions ‘PIE’ on the Monetary Union ‘CHERRY’: a new index of European Institutional Integration. ECB Occasional Paper (160)

    Google Scholar 

  • Durre A, Maddaloni A, Mongelli F (2014) Financial fragmentation and ECB monetary policy. Comp Econ Stud 56(3):396–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson M (1992) One market, one money: an evaluation of the potential benefits and costs of forming an economic and monetary union. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • European Central Bank (2015) Real convergence in the euro area: evidence, theory and policy impli cations. Economic Bulletin Issue 5/2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein M (1999) The euro risk. Time Europe Magazine

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Villaverde J, Garicano L, Santos T (2013) Political credit cycles: the case of the euro zone. National Bureau of Economic Research

    Google Scholar 

  • Fidrmuc J (2004) The endogeneity of the optimum currency area criteria, intra-industry trade, and EMU enlargement. Contemp Econ Policy 22(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fontagné L, Freudenberg M (1999) Endogenous symmetry of shocks in a monetary union. Open Econ Rev 10(3):263–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel JA, Rose AK (1998) The endogenity of the optimum currency area criteria. Econ J 108(449):1009–1025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaspar V, Mongelli FP (2003) Monetary unification and the single market. Economic convergence and divergence in Europe: growth and regional development in an enlarged European Union, 24

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick R, Rose AK (2015) Currency unions and trade: a post-EMU mea culpa. National Bureau of Economic Research

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonung L, Drea E (2010) It can’t happen, it’s a bad idea, it won’t last: US economists on the EMU and the Euro, 1989–2002. Econ J Watch 7(1):4–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalemli-Ozcan S, Sørensen BE, Yosha O (2003) Risk sharing and industrial specialization: regional and international evidence. Am Econ Rev 93(3):903–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman P, Venables AJ (1996) Integration, specialization, and adjustment. Eur Econ Rev 40(3-5):959–967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCallum J (1995) National borders matter: Canada-US regional trade patterns. Am Econ Rev 85(3):615–623

    Google Scholar 

  • Mélitz J (2004) Risk-sharing and EMU. J Common Mark Stud 42(4):815–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mongelli FP, Wyplosz C (2008) The euro at ten–unfulfilled threats and unexpected challenges. In: Paper presented at the 5th ECB central banking conference. ECB

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuknecht L, Moutot P, Rother P, Stark J (2011) The stability and growth pact: crisis and reform. ECB Occasional Paper (129)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shambaugh JC (2012) The Euro’s three crises Brookings papers on economic activity Spring 2012

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims CA (1999) The precarious fiscal foundations of EMU. De Economist 147(4):415–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinn HW (2012) Europe’s path to disunity. Project Syndicate, http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/why-a-united-states-of-europe-has-become-impossible-by-hans-werner-sinn

  • Sinn HW, Valentinyi A (2013) European imbalances. VoxEU, http://www.voxeu.org/article/european-imbalances

  • Wyplosz C (2006) European Monetary Union: the dark sides of a major success. Econ Policy 21(46):208–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeugner S (2013) Tradable vs. non-tradable: an empirical approach to the classification of sectors. http://www.zeugner.eu/studies/research/TradedShares_zeugner.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Paolo Mongelli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Annex: Additional Graphs and Tables

Annex: Additional Graphs and Tables

Fig. 12
figure a

GVA Share of Agricultural Sector (in percent), 1995–2014

Fig. 13
figure b

GVA Share of Real Estate Sector (in percent), 1995–2014

Fig. 14
figure c

GVA Share of Wholesale and Retail Trade Sector (in percent), 1995–2014

Fig. 15
figure d

GVA Share of ICT Sector (in percent), 1995–2014

Fig. 16
figure e

GVA Share of Professional Sector (in percent), 1995–2014

Fig. 17
figure f

GVA Share of Arts, Entertainment and Recreational Activities (in percent), 1995–2014

Fig. 18
figure g

Sub-Sectors of manufacturing (in percent of total sub-sector GVA). Source: Eurostat and authors’ calculation

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mongelli, F.P., Papadopoulos, G., Reinhold, E. (2017). Are Euro Area Economic Structures Changing?. In: da Costa Cabral, N., Gonçalves, J., Cunha Rodrigues, N. (eds) The Euro and the Crisis. Financial and Monetary Policy Studies, vol 43. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45710-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics