Abstract
Euro area countries have exhibited modest convergence prior to the financial crisis, but have started to follow diverging paths thereafter. Such divergence has been examined from many angles, and diverse narratives of the crisis have developed. Surprisingly, the gradual transformation of economic structures of euro area countries over the last 15–20 years has instead received less attention. This chapter presents evidence of ongoing changes in the allocation of countries’ resources across sectors. Some of such changes even preceded the launch of the euro.
The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the ECB or the Eurosystem. We are responsible for any errors or omissions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Moreover, households, and to a lesser extent firms, took advantage of cheap and abundant liquidity (Fernández-Villaverde et al. 2013). When the euro area crisis hit, stressed euro area countries experienced “sudden stops” and there was financial fragmentation (Camba-Méndez et al. 2014). A “doom loop” ensued (Schambaugh 2012).
- 2.
Today we know that the euro has been accompanied by more reciprocal trade between euro area countries (and with no “fortress Europe”). Estimates on the higher degree of openness range from a few percentage points to a more significant increase in intra-euro area trade.
- 3.
Consequently, the borders of new currency unions could be drawn larger in expectation that trade integration and income correlation would augment once a currency union is created. For some qualifications see Wyplosz (2006), and Mongelli and Wyplosz (2008). Then, more recently these early findings were completely overturned when Glick and Rose (2015) re-run a new set of gravity models using a dataset including the euro and found no significant effect of currency union on trade.
- 4.
For a survey of early EMU scepticism, see “It Can’t Happen, It’s a Bad Idea, It Won’t Last: U.S. Economists on the EMU and the Euro, 1989–2002” by Jonung and Drea (2010).
- 5.
There is instead some early evidence of income convergence when looking at all EU 27 countries: i.e., when the faster growing new EU members are added, see ECB (2015).
- 6.
In fact, economic growth is the combination of various additional factors such as demographics, capital endowment, human capital, natural resources, comparative advantages, a trained labour force that is able to work, and so on. Several of these factors are beyond the scope of this chapter.
- 7.
Technically, the relation is the following: the sum of GVA-shares at current basic prices, plus taxes on goods and services, less subsidies on goods and services provides a measure of GDP at current market prices.
- 8.
The opposite picture arises when we examine at the sale and rental of properties as captured by the Real Estate Sector share in GVA (see Annex). Spain, as well as Portugal and Ireland had lower shares than the other EA countries. An above average increase in the importance of this sector can be noted in Greece. Extreme developments in Greece and Ireland also drive the increasing coefficients of variation.
- 9.
We regard Construction, Financial and Real estate services, as well as Public administration as not tradable. Classifying an entire sector as either tradable or non-tradable is a very crude measure.
References
Camba-Méndez G, Carbó-Valverde S, Rodriguez-Palenzuela D (2014) Financial reputation, market interventions and debt issuance by banks: a truncated two-part model approach. European Central Bank
Chen R, Milesi-Ferretti MG-M, Tressel MT (2012) External imbalances in the Euro area. International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC
Coe DT, Helpman E (1995) International R&D spillovers. Eur Econ Rev 39(5):859–887
Constâncio V (2013) Establishing the single supervisory mechanism. Speech at the BAFT-IFSA 2013 Europe Bank-to-Bank Forum, 29 Jan 2013 (see ECB website)
Dorrucci E, Ioannou D, Mongelli FP, Terzi A (2015) The four Unions ‘PIE’ on the Monetary Union ‘CHERRY’: a new index of European Institutional Integration. ECB Occasional Paper (160)
Durre A, Maddaloni A, Mongelli F (2014) Financial fragmentation and ECB monetary policy. Comp Econ Stud 56(3):396–423
Emerson M (1992) One market, one money: an evaluation of the potential benefits and costs of forming an economic and monetary union. Oxford University Press, Oxford
European Central Bank (2015) Real convergence in the euro area: evidence, theory and policy impli cations. Economic Bulletin Issue 5/2015
Feldstein M (1999) The euro risk. Time Europe Magazine
Fernandez-Villaverde J, Garicano L, Santos T (2013) Political credit cycles: the case of the euro zone. National Bureau of Economic Research
Fidrmuc J (2004) The endogeneity of the optimum currency area criteria, intra-industry trade, and EMU enlargement. Contemp Econ Policy 22(1):1–12
Fontagné L, Freudenberg M (1999) Endogenous symmetry of shocks in a monetary union. Open Econ Rev 10(3):263–287
Frankel JA, Rose AK (1998) The endogenity of the optimum currency area criteria. Econ J 108(449):1009–1025
Gaspar V, Mongelli FP (2003) Monetary unification and the single market. Economic convergence and divergence in Europe: growth and regional development in an enlarged European Union, 24
Glick R, Rose AK (2015) Currency unions and trade: a post-EMU mea culpa. National Bureau of Economic Research
Jonung L, Drea E (2010) It can’t happen, it’s a bad idea, it won’t last: US economists on the EMU and the Euro, 1989–2002. Econ J Watch 7(1):4–52
Kalemli-Ozcan S, Sørensen BE, Yosha O (2003) Risk sharing and industrial specialization: regional and international evidence. Am Econ Rev 93(3):903–918
Krugman P, Venables AJ (1996) Integration, specialization, and adjustment. Eur Econ Rev 40(3-5):959–967
McCallum J (1995) National borders matter: Canada-US regional trade patterns. Am Econ Rev 85(3):615–623
Mélitz J (2004) Risk-sharing and EMU. J Common Mark Stud 42(4):815–840
Mongelli FP, Wyplosz C (2008) The euro at ten–unfulfilled threats and unexpected challenges. In: Paper presented at the 5th ECB central banking conference. ECB
Schuknecht L, Moutot P, Rother P, Stark J (2011) The stability and growth pact: crisis and reform. ECB Occasional Paper (129)
Shambaugh JC (2012) The Euro’s three crises Brookings papers on economic activity Spring 2012
Sims CA (1999) The precarious fiscal foundations of EMU. De Economist 147(4):415–436
Sinn HW (2012) Europe’s path to disunity. Project Syndicate, http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/why-a-united-states-of-europe-has-become-impossible-by-hans-werner-sinn
Sinn HW, Valentinyi A (2013) European imbalances. VoxEU, http://www.voxeu.org/article/european-imbalances
Wyplosz C (2006) European Monetary Union: the dark sides of a major success. Econ Policy 21(46):208–261
Zeugner S (2013) Tradable vs. non-tradable: an empirical approach to the classification of sectors. http://www.zeugner.eu/studies/research/TradedShares_zeugner.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Annex: Additional Graphs and Tables
Annex: Additional Graphs and Tables
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mongelli, F.P., Papadopoulos, G., Reinhold, E. (2017). Are Euro Area Economic Structures Changing?. In: da Costa Cabral, N., Gonçalves, J., Cunha Rodrigues, N. (eds) The Euro and the Crisis. Financial and Monetary Policy Studies, vol 43. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45710-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45710-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45709-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45710-9
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)