Skip to main content

Conclusion: Does ‘Rising’ in Power Equate to ‘Shifting’ of Power?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Shifting Power in Asia-Pacific?

Part of the book series: Global Power Shift ((GLOBAL))

  • 1678 Accesses

Abstract

Has there been a power shift in Asia-Pacific as the brief US-Chinese navy encounter suggested? This study has addressed this puzzle by conducting the most extensive assessment of the alleged power shift in Asia-Pacific so far. It provided an extensive overview of some of the major Western texts on Sino-US competition, which overall suggested that we are in the midst of a power shift. As shown in Chap. 1, immediately after the end of the Cold War, the demise of the Soviet Union altered the international system profoundly. Western scholars grew concerned about China as a new potential challenger to US primacy. This was particularly due to the growing Chinese economic and military profile. While not all of the authors addressed referred to China as a threat to US or Western interests, the number of authors concerned about Chinese advances both economic and the militaristic steadily grew. Particularly authors writing in a realist tradition warned about the effects of the diverging relative developments in both countries. According to them, this almost certainly lays the basis for further Chinese challenges to Washington’s leadership, both in the Asia-Pacific and beyond. Section 1.2 demonstrated that authors who write in the liberal and constructivist traditions of IR also generally accept the strategic competition between Washington and Beijing. They likewise acknowledge that some kind of power shift between both nations is happening (however, in contrast to realist authors they do not believe that this dynamic leads necessarily to increasing militarisation, hostility and violence between China and the US in the long run).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Gu, Xuewu (2012): ‘Strukturelle Macht: Eine dritte Machtquelle?’, Östereichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 259–276, p. 152 (Sackgasse, own translation).

  2. 2.

    These states are: the United States, China, Russia, India, Australia, Pakistan, Japan, Republic of Korea, Thailand and Indonesia.

  3. 3.

    The Leader-Laggard standardisation methodologically supports this kind of analysis.

  4. 4.

    Zakaria, Fareed (1999): From Wealth to Power. The Unusual Origins of America’s World Role. Princeton: Princeton University Press, p. 191.

  5. 5.

    Security indicators: security and stationing agreements, participation in military exercises and trainings, arms trade, external defence funding; economic indicators: foreign trade, FDI (flows and stock), foreign aid; political indicators: public opinion, congruence of voting behaviour with the US in the UN General Assembly, share of Chinese population.

  6. 6.

    A novel approach on the issue can be found in Pustovitovskij, Andrej (2016): Strukturelle Kraft in den Internationalen Beziehungen. Heidelberg: Springer.

  7. 7.

    See for instance Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce (1981): The War Trap. New Haven: Yale University Press as well as Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce/Lalman, David (1989): ‘Dyadic Power, Expectations, and War’, in: Stoll, Richard J./Ward, Michael D. (eds.): Power in World Politics. Boulder: Lynne Rienner, pp. 177–191.

  8. 8.

    Zheng, Bingwen (2011): ‘The ‘Middle Income Trap’ and China’s Path to Development: International Experiences and Lessons’, China Economist, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 16–27.

  9. 9.

    Ferguson, Niall/Kotlikoff, Laurence J. (2003): ‘Going Critical. American Power and the Consequences of Fiscal Overstretch’, The National Interest, Fall 2003, No. 73, pp. 22–32; Layne, Christopher (2009): ‘The Waning of US Hegemony – Myth or Reality? A Review Essay’, International Security, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 147–172, p. 168; Haass, Richard N. (2014): Foreign Policy Begins at Home. The Case for Putting America’s House in Order. New York: Basic Books, pp. 123–164.

  10. 10.

    Bergsten, C. Fred (2005): ‘Two’s Company’, Foreign Affairs, September/October 2009, https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/americas/2009-09-01/twos-company (22.09.2015).

  11. 11.

    Jones, David M./Smith, M.L.R. (2015): ‘Return to Reason: Reviving Political Realism in Western Foreign Policy’, International Affairs, Vol. 91, No. 5, pp. 933–952.

References

  • Bergsten, C. F. (2005). Two’s Company. Foreign Affairs, September/October 2009. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/americas/2009-09-01/twos-company. Accessed 22 Sep 2015.

  • Bueno de Mesquita, B. (1981). The war trap. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bueno de Mesquita, B., & Lalman, D. (1989). Dyadic power, expectations, and war. In R. J. Stoll & M. D. Ward (Eds.), Power in world politics (pp. 177–191). Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, N., & Kotlikoff, L. J. (2003). Going critical. American power and the consequences of fiscal overstretch. The National Interest, Fall, No. 73, 22–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gu, X. (2012). Strukturelle Macht: Eine dritte Machtquelle? Östereichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 41(3), 259–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haass, R. N. (2014). Foreign policy begins at home. The case for putting America’s house in order. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. M., & Smith, M. L. R. (2015). Return to reason: Reviving political realism in western foreign policy. International Affairs, 91(5), 933–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Layne, C. (2009). The waning of US hegemony—Myth or reality? A review essay. International Security, 34(1), 147–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pustovitovskij, A. (2016). Strukturelle Kraft in den Internationalen Beziehungen. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zakaria, F. (1999). From wealth to power. The unusual origins of America’s world role. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, B. (2011). The ‘middle income trap’ and China’s path to development: International experiences and lessons. China Economist, 6(3), 16–27.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fels, E. (2017). Conclusion: Does ‘Rising’ in Power Equate to ‘Shifting’ of Power?. In: Shifting Power in Asia-Pacific?. Global Power Shift. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45689-8_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics