Computer-Assisted Fixators for Deformity Surgery

  • Mustafa CeliktasEmail author
  • Mahir Gulsen
  • Cenk Ozkan


Extremity discrepancies, short stature, pseudoarthrosis, infections such as chronic osteomyelitis, acute trauma with bone loss, and deformities either in the bones or joints are routine problems dealt with in daily practice. In the majority of these problems, an Ilizarov external fixator (EF) is used, often as the first choice or for revision of previously unsuccessful surgery (as reported by Ilizarov (Clin Orthop Relat Res 280: 7–10, 1992)). The Ilizarov EF is highly modular, which increases the chance of success, but also entails a long learning curve. Especially in multiplanar deformities, because of the hinge positioning difficulties, lengthening and translations are made with different apparatus thus the system requires frequent revision (as reported by Mutlu (J Eng Math 54:119, 2006)). This situation creates anxiety in the patient and is time-consuming for the physician. Therefore, the use of circular Ilizarov external fixator is gradually being replaced by computer-assisted fixators.


  1. 1.
    Eren I, Eralp L, Kocaoglu M. Comparative clinical study on deformity correction accuracy of different external fixators. Int Orthop. 2013;37(11):2247–52. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2116-x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gessmann J, Jettkant B, Könıgshausen M, TA S, Seybold D. Improved wire stiffness with modified connection bolts in Ilizarov external frames:a biomechanical study. Acta Bioeng Biomech. 2012;14(4):15–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gough VE, Whitehall SG. Universal tire test machine. Proceedings of the FISITA ninth international technical congress. 1962. p. 117–37.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Henderson ER, Feldman DS, Lusk C, van Bosse HJ, Sala D, Kummer FJ. Conformational instability of the taylor spatial frame: a case report and biomechanical study. J Pediatr Orthop. 2008;28(4):471–7. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e318173ecb1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ilizarov G, VI L. The replacement of long tubular bone defects by lengthening distraction osteotomy of one of the fragments. 1969. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;280:7–10.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mutlu H, Akçalı Hİ, Gülsen M. A mathematical model for the use of a Gough-Stewart platform mechanism as a fixator. J Eng Math. 2006;54:119. doi: 10.1007/s10665-005-9007-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Paley D. Principles of deformity correction. Heidelberg: Springer; 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Paley D. History and science behind the six-axis correction external fixation devices in orthopaedic surgery. Oper Tech Orthop. 2011;21:125–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sarpel Y, Gulsen M, Togrul E, Capa M, Herdem M. Comparison of mechanical performance among different frame configurations of the Ilizarov external fixator: experimental study. J Trauma. 2005;58(3):546–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Skomoroshko PV, Vilensky VA, Hammouda AI, Fletcher MDA, Solomin LN. Determination of the maximal corrective ability and optimal placement of the Ortho-SUV frame for femoral deformity with respect to the soft tissue envelope, a biomechanical modelling study. Adv Orthop. 2014;2014:268567. doi: 10.1155/2014/268567.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Skomoroshko PV, Vilensky VA, AI H, MD F, LN S. Mechanical rigidity of the Ortho-SUV frame compared to the Ilizarov frame in the correction of femoral deformity. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2015;10:5–11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stewart D. A platform with six degrees of freedom. Proc Instn Mech Eng. 1965;180:371–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Taylor JC. Correction of general deformity with the Taylor spatial frame fixator 1996.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ortopedia HospitalAdanaTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Orthopedic Surgery and TraumatologyÇukurova UniversityAdanaTurkey

Personalised recommendations