Advertisement

Introduction to Deformity Analysis and Planning

  • İlker Eren
Chapter

Abstract

Deformity can be simply described as deviation from normal anatomy. This can be in the form of angulation, translation, rotation or length. The purpose of analysis is to report the magnitude and direction of a deformity or combination of deformities in a patient. To achieve this goal, we should have the standard values of the normal anatomy and a standard radiologic survey to work on. This chapter covers the description and basic components of a deformity and principles to obtain appropriate radiologic imaging for analysis. Details of each deformity component and methods for their correction will be discussed in the following chapters.

References

  1. 1.
    Chao E et al. Biomechanics of malalignment. The Orthopedic Clinics of North America. 1994;25(3):379–86.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cooke T, Siu D, Fisher B. The use of standardized radiographs to identify the deformities associated with osteoarthritis. Recent developments in orthopedic Surgery. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1987.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cooke T, Li J, Scudamore RA. Radiographic assessment of bony contributions to knee deformity. The Orthopedic Clinics of North America. 1994;25(3):387–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Krackow K. Approaches to planning lower extremity alignment for total knee arthroplasty and osteotomy about the knee. Adv Orthop Surg. 1983;7:69–88.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Moreland JR, Bassett L, Hanker G. Radiographic analysis of the axial alignment of the lower extremity. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 1987;69(5):745–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Paley D et al. Deformity planning for frontal and sagittal plane corrective osteotomies. Orthop Clin North Am. 1994;25(3):425–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hollister AM et al. The axes of rotation of the knee. Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 1993;290:259–68.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Horsfield D, Jones S. Assessment of inequality in length of the lower limb. Radiography. 1985;52(605):223–7.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Green WT, Wyatt GM, Anderson M. Orthoroentgenography as a method of measuring the bones of the lower extremities. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1946;28:60–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Saleh M, Milne A. Weight-bearing parallel-beam scanography for the measurement of leg length and joint alignment. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994;76(1):156–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guenoun B et al. Reliability of a new method for lower-extremity measurements based on stereoradiographic three-dimensional reconstruction. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research. 2012;98(5):506–13.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kalifa G et al. Evaluation of a new low-dose digital x-ray device: first dosimetric and clinical results in children. Pediatric radiology. 1998;28(7):557–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dubousset J et al. EOS stereo-radiography system: whole-body simultaneous anteroposterior and lateral radiographs with very low radiation dose. Revue de chirurgie orthopédique et réparatrice de l'appareil moteur. 2007;93(6 Suppl):141.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Altongy JF, Harcke HT, Bowen JR. Measurement of leg length inequalities by Micro-Dose digital radiographs. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics. 1987;7(3):311–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedics and TraumatologyKoç University, School of Medicine, Koç University HospitalIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations