Skip to main content

The BF-TOPSIS Approach for Solving Non-classical MCDM Problems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9861))

Abstract

In this paper we show how the Belief-Function based Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (BF-TOPSIS) approach can be used for solving non-classical multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problems. We give simple examples to illustrate our presentation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Analytic hierarchy process.

  2. 2.

    Elimination and choice translating reality.

  3. 3.

    Technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution.

  4. 4.

    In the MCDM context, a source of information consists in the list of scores values of alternatives related to a given criterion.

  5. 5.

    The power set \(2^\mathcal {A}\) is the set of all subsets of \(\mathcal {A}\), empty set \(\emptyset \) and \(\mathcal {A}\) included.

  6. 6.

    As proposed in Smets Transferable Belief Model for instance.

  7. 7.

    Depending on the context of the MCDM problem, the score can be interpreted either as a cost/expense or as a reward/benefit. In the sequel, by convention and without loss of generality, we will interpret the score as a reward having monotonically increasing preference. Thus, the best alternative with respect to a given criterion will be the one providing the highest reward/benefit.

  8. 8.

    Indeed, \(Bel_{ij}(X_i)\) and \(Bel_{ij}(\bar{X}_i)\) (where \(\bar{X}_i\) is the complement of \(X_i\) in the FoD \(\mathcal {A}\)) belong to [0, 1] and they are consistent because the equality \(Pl_{ij}(X_i)=1-Bel_{ij}(\bar{X}_i)\) holds. The proof is similar to the one given in [11].

  9. 9.

    If \(X^j_{\max }=0\) then \(Bel_{ij}(X_i)=0\), and if \(X^j_{\min }=0\) then \(Pl_{ij}(X_i)=1\), so that \(Bel_{ij}(\bar{X}_i)=0\).

  10. 10.

    When a score value is missing for some proposition \(X_i\) (i.e. if \(S_j(X_i)= \varnothing \)), then we take the vacuous BBA \(m_{ij}(X_i\cup \bar{X}_i)=1\).

  11. 11.

    For instance by normalizing the \(C(X_i,X^\text {best})\) values (the most right column of Table 2) and interpret it as a BBA, and then apply a decision method described in [15].

References

  1. Saaty, T.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York (1980)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Dezert, J., Tacnet, J.-M., Batton-Hubert, M., Smarandache, F.: Multi-criteria decision making based on DSmT/AHP. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Belief Functions, Brest, France (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dezert, J., Tacnet, J.-M.: Evidential reasoning for multi-criteria analysis based on DSmT-AHP. In: Proceedings of the ISAHP 2011, Italy (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tacnet, J.-M., Dezert, J., Batton-Hubert, M.: AHP and uncertainty theories for decision making using the ER-MCDA methodology. In: Proceedings of the ISAHP 2011, Italy (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ennaceur, A., Elouedi, Z., Lefevre, E.: Multi-criteria decision making method with belief preference relations. Int. J. Uncertainty Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst. (IJUFKS) 22(4), 573–590 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Ennaceur, A., Elouedi, Z., Lefevre, E.: Belief AHP method: AHP method with the belief function framework. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Making (IJITDM) 15(3), 553–573 (2016)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang, X., Triantaphyllou, E.: Ranking irregularities when evaluating alternatives by using some ELECTRE methods. Omega 36(1), 45–63 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K.: Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol. 186. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1981)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Lai, Y.J., Liu, T.Y., Hwang, C.L.: TOPSIS for MODM. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 76(3), 486–500 (1994)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Dezert, J., Tacnet, J.-M.: Soft ELECTRE TRI outranking method based on belief functions. In: Proceedings of the 15th Fusion Conference, Singapore (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dezert, J., Han, D., Yin, H.: A new belief function based approach for multi-criteria decision-making support. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Fusion Conference, Heidelberg, Germany (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Carladous, S., Tacnet, J.-M., Dezert, J., Han, D., Batton-Hubert, M.: Evaluation of efficiency of torrential protective structures with new BF-TOPSIS methods. In: Proceedings of the 19th Fusion Conference, Heidelberg, Germany (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shafer, G.: A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1976)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Han, D., Dezert, J., Yang, Y.: New distance measures of evidence based on belief intervals. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Belief International Conference, Oxford (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dezert, J., Han, D., Tacnet, J.-M., Carladous, S., Yang, Y.: Decision-making with belief interval distance. In: Proceedings of the 4th Belief International Conference, Prague, Czech Republic (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Irpino, A., Verde, R.: Dynamic clustering of interval data using a wasserstein-based distance. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 29, 1648–1658 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean Dezert .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dezert, J., Han, D., Tacnet, JM., Carladous, S., Yin, H. (2016). The BF-TOPSIS Approach for Solving Non-classical MCDM Problems. In: Vejnarová, J., Kratochvíl, V. (eds) Belief Functions: Theory and Applications. BELIEF 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9861. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45559-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45559-4_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45558-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45559-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics