Skip to main content

Introduction to Gamification: Foundation and Underlying Theories

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Progress in IS ((PROIS))

Abstract

This introductory article provides basic definitions, concepts and theories surrounding gamification that are used throughout the remainder of this book. It distinguishes gamification from other research areas, such as gameful design and serious games. It then goes on to introduce common game mechanics, achievement systems, game dynamics and aesthetics. The second part of the article focusses on underlying theories. It examines the influence of motivation theory, achievement goal theory and flow theory on gamification. The article also describes different player archetypes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barr, P. (2007). Video game values: Play as human-computer interaction. Interacting with Computers, 19(2), 180–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartle, R. (1996). Hearts, clubs, diamonds, spades: players who suit MUDs. Journal of MUD Research, 1(1), 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunchball.com. (2010, 10). Gamification 101: An Introduction to the Use of Game Dynamics to Influence Behavior. Retrieved from http://www.bunchball.com/sites/default/files/downloads/gamification101.pdf

  • Caillois, R. (1961). Man, play and games. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. M. (1982). The adventure of getting to know a computer. Computer, 15(11), 49–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatfield, T. (2010, 7). Tom Chatfield: 7 Ways Games Reward the Brain. Retrieved from TED Talks: http://www.ted.com/talks/tom_chatfield_7_ways_games_reward_the_brain.html

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety: Experiencing flow in work and play. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2008). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., & LeFevre, J. (1989). Optimal experience in work and leisure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(5), 815–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demerouti, E., Bakker, A., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 6(3), 499–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining gamification. In MindTrek ‘11 Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments (pp. 9–15). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galli, L., & Fraternali, P. (2014). Achievement systems explained. In Y. Baek, R. Ko, & T. Marsh (Eds.), Trends and applications of serious gaming and social media (pp. 22–50). Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gnauk, B., Dannecker, L., & Hahmann, B. (2012). Leveraging gamification in demand dispatch systems. In EDBT-ICDT ‘12 Proceedings of the 2012 Joint EDBT/ICDT Workshops (pp. 103–110).

    Google Scholar 

  • Groh, F. (2011). Gamification: State of the art definition and utilization. In N. Asaj, B. Könings, M. Poguntke, F. Schaub, B. Wiedersheim, & M. Weber (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Seminar on Research Trends in Media Informatics (pp. 39–45).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamari, J., & Eranti, V. (2011). Framework for designing and evaluating game achievements. In DiGRA ‘11—Proceedings of the 2011 DiGRA International Conference: Think Design Play (Vol. 6, pp. 122–134).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawlitschek, A., & Köppen, V. (2014a). Analyzing player behavior in digital game-based learning: Advantages and challenges. In The 8th European Conference on Games Based Learning—ECGBL. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawlitschek, A., & Köppen, V. (2014b). Analyzing player behavior in digital game-based learning: Advantages and challenges. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Games Based Learning (Vol. 1, p. 199).

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzig, P., Ameling, M., & Schill, A. (2012a). A generic platform for enerprise gamification. In 10th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture, (pp. 219–223).

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzig, P., Srahringer, S., & Ameling, M. (2012b). Gamification of ERP systems—Exploring gamification effects on user acceptance constructs. In Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik GITO (pp. 793–804).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huizinga, J. (1949). Homo Ludens a study of the play-element in culture. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunicke, R., LeBlanc, M., & Zubek, R. (2004). MDA: A formal approach to game design and game research. In Proceedings of the Challenges in Games AI Workshop, Nineteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. San Jose, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huotari, K., & Hamari, J. (2012). Defining gamification: A service marketing perspective. In International Academic MindTrek Conference (pp. 17–22). New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juul, J. (2005). Half-real: Video games between rules and fictional worlds. MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S., & Ko, F. (2013). Toward gamified classroom: Classification of engineering students based on the Bartle’s player types model. International Journal of Digital Content Technology and its Applications (JDCTA), 7(2), 25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Z., & Liu, Z. (2005). Building an intelligent pedagogical agent with competiton mechanism to improve the effectiveness of an educational game. In Workshop on educational games as intelligent learning environments.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, T. W. (1982). Heursitics for designing enjoyable user interfaces: Lessons from computer games. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems (pp. 63–86). New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matallaoui, A., Herzig, P., & Zarnekow, R. (2015). Model-Driven serious game development: Integration of the gamification modeling language GaML with unity. In 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (pp. 643–651). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGonigal, J. (2011). Reality is broken: Why games make us better and how they can change the world. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevid, J. (2012). Psychology: Concepts and applications (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadworth: Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priebatsch, S. (2010, 8). Seth Priebatsch: The game layer on top of the world. Retrieved from TED Talks: http://www.ted.com/talks/seth_priebatsch_the_game_layer_on_top_of_the_world.html

  • Ryan, R. M., & Edward, D. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salen, K., & Zimmermann, E. (2004). Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. : MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheiner, C., Witt, M., Voigt, K., & Robra-Bissantz, S. (2012). Einsatz von Spielemechaniken in Ideewettbewerben. In Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik (pp. 781–792).

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psycholigist, 55(1), 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thom, J., Millen, D., & DiMicco, J. (2012). Removing Gamification from an Enterprise SNS. In CSCW ‘12 Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 1067–1070).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. M. (1982). Metaphor and the cognitive representation of computing systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 12(2), 107–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitson, C., & Consoli, J. (2009). Flow theory and student engagement. Journal of Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives in Education, 2(1), 40–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, J., Ackerman, M. S., Adamic, & A. L. (2011). Virtual Gifts and Guanxi: Supporting Social Exchange in a Chinese Online Community. In CSCW ‘11 Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work (pp. 45–54).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zichermann, G., & Linder, J. (2013). The gamification revolution: How leaders leverage game mechanics to crush the competition (1st ed.). USA: McGraw-Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rüdiger Zarnekow .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Matallaoui, A., Hanner, N., Zarnekow, R. (2017). Introduction to Gamification: Foundation and Underlying Theories. In: Stieglitz, S., Lattemann, C., Robra-Bissantz, S., Zarnekow, R., Brockmann, T. (eds) Gamification. Progress in IS. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45557-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics